What is Turbolinks and what are its top alternatives?
Top Alternatives to Turbolinks
React
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...
Active Admin
Active Admin is a Ruby on Rails framework for creating elegant backends for website administration. ...
Bootsnap
Bootsnap is a library that plugs into a number of Ruby and (optionally) ActiveSupport and YAML methods to optimize and cache expensive computations. ...
StimulusReflex
It is an exciting new way to build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails. It eliminates the complexity imposed by full-stack frontend frameworks. And, it's fast. It works seamlessly with the Rails tooling you already know and love. ...
RubyGems
It is a package manager for the Ruby programming language that provides a standard format for distributing Ruby programs and libraries, a tool designed to easily manage the installation of gems, and a server for distributing them. ...
Turbolinks alternatives & related posts
- Components754
- Virtual dom651
- Performance560
- Simplicity485
- Composable436
- Data flow174
- Declarative159
- Isn't an mvc framework123
- Reactive updates113
- Explicit app state110
- JSX31
- Learn once, write everywhere23
- Uni-directional data flow18
- Easy to Use16
- Works great with Flux Architecture14
- Great perfomance10
- Built by Facebook8
- Javascript6
- TypeScript support5
- Speed5
- Scalable4
- Awesome4
- Easy to start4
- Feels like the 90s4
- Fancy third party tools3
- Hooks3
- Server side views3
- Functional3
- Simple2
- Great migration pathway for older systems2
- Server Side Rendering2
- Cross-platform2
- SSR2
- Fast evolving2
- Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive2
- Rich ecosystem2
- Has functional components2
- Has arrow functions2
- Strong Community2
- Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others2
- Very gentle learning curve2
- Excellent Documentation2
- Super easy2
- Props2
- Scales super well2
- Just the View of MVC2
- Www1
- Start simple1
- Sdfsdfsdf1
- Allows creating single page applications1
- Fragments1
- Split your UI into components with one true state1
- Sharable1
- Every decision architecture wise makes sense1
- Permissively-licensed1
- Beautiful and Neat Component Management1
- Obama1
- Requires discipline to keep architecture organized33
- No predefined way to structure your app21
- Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages20
- Not enterprise friendly6
- JSX6
- One-way binding only1
- State consistency with backend neglected1
related React posts
I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.
I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.
It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.
- Customizable7
- Easy Integration3
- Powerful Admin Portal2
related Active Admin posts
related Bootsnap posts
- Reactive stateless frontends2
- Based on CableReady for dom diffing2
- Deklarative - no Javascript2
- Most simple extension of the MVC model2
- Rails backend needed1
related StimulusReflex posts