What is Turbolinks and what are its top alternatives?
Top Alternatives to Turbolinks
ReactLots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...
BootsnapBootsnap is a library that plugs into a number of Ruby and (optionally) ActiveSupport and YAML methods to optimize and cache expensive computations. ...
Active AdminActive Admin is a Ruby on Rails framework for creating elegant backends for website administration. ...
StimulusReflexIt is an exciting new way to build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails. It eliminates the complexity imposed by full-stack frontend frameworks. And, it's fast. It works seamlessly with the Rails tooling you already know and love. ...
RubyGemsIt is a package manager for the Ruby programming language that provides a standard format for distributing Ruby programs and libraries, a tool designed to easily manage the installation of gems, and a server for distributing them. ...
Turbolinks alternatives & related posts
- Components801
- Virtual dom663
- Performance572
- Simplicity500
- Composable442
- Data flow183
- Declarative165
- Isn't an mvc framework126
- Reactive updates116
- Explicit app state113
- JSX44
- Learn once, write everywhere27
- Uni-directional data flow20
- Easy to Use20
- Works great with Flux Architecture16
- Great perfomance11
- Built by Facebook9
- Javascript9
- TypeScript support7
- Speed6
- Hooks5
- Excellent Documentation5
- Props5
- Functional5
- Easy as Lego5
- Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others5
- Cross-platform5
- Server Side Rendering5
- Feels like the 90s5
- Easy to start5
- Awesome5
- Scalable5
- Strong Community4
- Server side views4
- Fancy third party tools4
- Scales super well4
- Start simple4
- Super easy4
- Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive3
- Fast evolving3
- SSR3
- Great migration pathway for older systems3
- Rich ecosystem3
- Simple3
- Has functional components3
- Allows creating single page applications3
- Has arrow functions3
- Very gentle learning curve3
- Sdfsdfsdf3
- Beautiful and Neat Component Management3
- Just the View of MVC3
- Split your UI into components with one true state2
- Fragments2
- Sharable2
- Every decision architecture wise makes sense2
- Permissively-licensed2
- Image upload1
- HTML-like1
- Recharts1
- Requires discipline to keep architecture organized38
- No predefined way to structure your app27
- Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages26
- JSX10
- Not enterprise friendly8
- One-way binding only6
- State consistency with backend neglected3
- Bad Documentation3
- Paradigms change too fast2
- Error boundary is needed2
related React posts
.NET Core
Angular CLI
React
MongoDB
Flutter
React Native
Postman
Markdown
Visual Studio CodeI am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.
I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.
A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.
In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.
If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.
related Bootsnap posts
- Customizable7
- Easy Integration3
- Powerful Admin Portal2
related Active Admin posts
- Reactive stateless frontends2
- Based on CableReady for dom diffing2
- Deklarative - no Javascript2
- Most simple extension of the MVC model2
- Rails backend needed1
related StimulusReflex posts