StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs Heroku CI

AWS CodeBuild vs Heroku CI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43
Heroku CI
Heroku CI
Stacks90
Followers132
Votes5

AWS CodeBuild vs Heroku CI: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Environment: In AWS CodeBuild, developers have flexibility in setting up their own deployment environment, allowing them to customize and control the entire process. On the other hand, Heroku CI provides a predefined deployment environment, which can be convenient for quick deployment but limits customization options.

  2. Integration with other AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeCommit, and AWS S3, providing a comprehensive DevOps ecosystem. Heroku CI, being a part of the Heroku platform, has strong integration with Heroku's services but may lack the breadth of integration options with other external services.

  3. Pricing Structure: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on build minutes and compute resources used, providing cost efficiency for varying project requirements. Heroku CI, as part of the Heroku platform, may have a more bundled pricing structure, potentially leading to higher costs for smaller projects or infrequent builds.

  4. Scalability: AWS CodeBuild offers the ability to scale build capacity easily by adjusting resources to meet varying project demands, ensuring optimal performance and efficiency. In comparison, Heroku CI may have limitations in scalability, as it is tied to the resources available within the Heroku platform.

  5. Build Environment Configuration: In AWS CodeBuild, developers can specify and customize the build environment through build specification files or Docker images, offering flexibility and control over the build process. However, Heroku CI provides a more streamlined approach to build environment configuration, which may simplify the setup process but limit advanced customization options.

  6. Support for Different Programming Languages: AWS CodeBuild supports a wide range of programming languages and tools, giving developers flexibility in their choice of technology stack. Heroku CI, being a part of the Heroku ecosystem, is well-suited for applications developed using the supported languages and frameworks within the Heroku platform.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and Heroku CI differ in deployment environment customization, integration with other services, pricing structure, scalability, build environment configuration, and support for different programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Heroku CI
Heroku CI

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

On every push to GitHub, Heroku CI runs your tests in a disposable Heroku app, so there’s never a wait time for a free CI worker. Tests run fast, on Performance dynos.

Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
-
Statistics
Stacks
443
Stacks
90
Followers
485
Followers
132
Votes
43
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Pros
  • 3
    No waiting in the queue
  • 1
    Best in class pipeline integration
  • 1
    Consolidated Heroku billing
Integrations
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Heroku
Heroku
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeBuild, Heroku CI?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana