Azure Pipelines vs BuildMaster

Overview

BuildMaster

Stacks6

Followers7

Votes0

Azure Pipelines

Stacks2.3K

Followers457

Votes14

Azure Pipelines vs BuildMaster: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of DevOps, Azure Pipelines and BuildMaster are commonly used tools for CI/CD processes. Understanding the key differences between them is essential for choosing the right tool for a specific project.

Hosting Environment: Azure Pipelines is a cloud-based CI/CD service provided by Microsoft in Azure DevOps, allowing users to build, test, and deploy code in the cloud. On the other hand, BuildMaster is an on-premises CI/CD tool that supports both cloud and on-premises servers, providing flexibility in deployment options.
Integration: Azure Pipelines seamlessly integrates with popular version control systems like Git, TFVC, and SVN, enabling developers to trigger builds automatically upon code commits. BuildMaster also supports integration with various source control systems but requires additional configuration for seamless automation.
Extensibility: Azure Pipelines offers a wide range of pre-built tasks that can be easily added to the pipeline, allowing users to customize and extend functionality effortlessly. In contrast, BuildMaster focuses on custom scripting, providing a powerful scripting engine for users to create their own deployment workflows with more control and flexibility.
Pricing: Azure Pipelines offers a free tier with limited build minutes per month and options for additional paid plans based on usage. BuildMaster follows a licensing model based on the number of active pipelines and agents, which can be more cost-effective for larger organizations with higher demands on CI/CD processes.
Deployment Targets: Azure Pipelines supports deployment to various targets including Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, and on-premises servers, providing a wide range of deployment options. BuildMaster also offers deployment to multiple environments but excels in managing complex deployment scenarios with version tagging, rollback capabilities, and more granular control over the deployment process.
Community Support: Azure Pipelines benefits from a large community of users and extensive documentation resources, making it easier for users to troubleshoot issues and find solutions. BuildMaster, while having a dedicated user base, may have fewer community resources available for support, requiring users to rely more on in-house expertise or paid support options.

In Summary, choosing between Azure Pipelines and BuildMaster depends on factors such as hosting preferences, integration requirements, extensibility needs, budget constraints, deployment targets, and available community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on BuildMaster, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

BuildMaster	Azure Pipelines
It is a fully-functional Continuous Integration tool for a variety of platforms allowing your organization to start using CI/CD today, even with legacy applications. It runs automated testing for your applications and notify key team members if those tests fail.	Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.
Static Analysis & Reporting; Automated UI Tests;	Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
Stacks 6	Stacks 2.3K
Followers 7	Followers 457
Votes 0	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 4 Easy to get started 3 Built by Microsoft 3 Unlimited CI/CD minutes 2 Docker support 2 Yaml support
Integrations
Node.js .NET Java	.NET Core Slack Python Ruby Kubernetes .NET Node.js Linux Microsoft Azure RxJava

What are some alternatives to BuildMaster, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Azure Pipelines vs BuildMaster: What are the differences?

Hosting Environment: Azure Pipelines is a cloud-based CI/CD service provided by Microsoft in Azure DevOps, allowing users to build, test, and deploy code in the cloud. On the other hand, BuildMaster is an on-premises CI/CD tool that supports both cloud and on-premises servers, providing flexibility in deployment options.
Integration: Azure Pipelines seamlessly integrates with popular version control systems like Git, TFVC, and SVN, enabling developers to trigger builds automatically upon code commits. BuildMaster also supports integration with various source control systems but requires additional configuration for seamless automation.
Extensibility: Azure Pipelines offers a wide range of pre-built tasks that can be easily added to the pipeline, allowing users to customize and extend functionality effortlessly. In contrast, BuildMaster focuses on custom scripting, providing a powerful scripting engine for users to create their own deployment workflows with more control and flexibility.
Pricing: Azure Pipelines offers a free tier with limited build minutes per month and options for additional paid plans based on usage. BuildMaster follows a licensing model based on the number of active pipelines and agents, which can be more cost-effective for larger organizations with higher demands on CI/CD processes.
Deployment Targets: Azure Pipelines supports deployment to various targets including Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, and on-premises servers, providing a wide range of deployment options. BuildMaster also offers deployment to multiple environments but excels in managing complex deployment scenarios with version tagging, rollback capabilities, and more granular control over the deployment process.
Community Support: Azure Pipelines benefits from a large community of users and extensive documentation resources, making it easier for users to troubleshoot issues and find solutions. BuildMaster, while having a dedicated user base, may have fewer community resources available for support, requiring users to rely more on in-house expertise or paid support options.

Azure Pipelines vs BuildMaster

Overview