StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure Pipelines vs Zuul CI

Azure Pipelines vs Zuul CI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Stacks2.3K
Followers457
Votes14
Zuul CI
Zuul CI
Stacks5
Followers21
Votes3

Azure Pipelines vs Zuul CI: What are the differences?

  1. Hosting Service: Azure Pipelines is a service offered by Microsoft Azure, while Zuul CI is an open-source continuous integration tool developed by the OpenStack community. Users can choose to use Azure Pipelines as part of Microsoft's cloud services, while Zuul CI can be self-hosted or hosted on a third-party platform.

  2. Configuration Language: Azure Pipelines uses YAML configuration for defining build pipelines and release workflows, making it user-friendly for developers with experience in working with YAML files. On the other hand, Zuul CI uses Ansible playbooks for its configuration, catering more towards users familiar with Ansible.

  3. Scalability: Azure Pipelines can easily scale up or down based on the user's needs, with options for parallel jobs and distributed workflows, ideal for projects of all sizes. Zuul CI, known for its scalability, is optimized for managing extremely large and complex projects with numerous code repositories and dependencies.

  4. Integration with Version Control Systems: Azure Pipelines has seamless integrations with popular version control systems such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing for easy setup and configuration of pipelines directly linked to code repositories. Zuul CI primarily supports Git as its version control system, which might require additional setup steps for integration with other VCS platforms.

  5. Community Support: Azure Pipelines has a large community of users and extensive documentation provided by Microsoft, guaranteeing continuous support and updates for the platform. Zuul CI, being an open-source tool, relies heavily on community contributions for improvements and troubleshooting, ensuring a collaborative environment for users to address issues and suggest enhancements.

  6. Extensibility: Azure Pipelines allows users to extend its functionality through custom integrations and plugins available in the Azure DevOps Marketplace, offering a wide range of tools to enhance the pipeline workflows. Zuul CI provides flexibility through its plugin system, enabling users to develop custom plugins and extensions tailored to their specific project requirements, fostering a more customizable CI/CD environment.

In Summary, Azure Pipelines and Zuul CI differ in hosting service, configuration language, scalability, integration with version control systems, community support, and extensibility, providing users with diverse options based on their project needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Azure Pipelines, Zuul CI

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Zuul CI
Zuul CI

Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.

It is an open source CI/CD platform specializing in gating changes across multiple systems and applications before landing a single patch.

Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Project Gating;CI/CD with Ansible;Cross-Project Dependencies
Statistics
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
5
Followers
457
Followers
21
Votes
14
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Built by Microsoft
  • 3
    Unlimited CI/CD minutes
  • 2
    Yaml support
  • 2
    Docker support
Pros
  • 1
    No vendor-lock In. Zero Cost
  • 1
    Hard to configure
  • 1
    Open-source Mostly used with Openstack
Integrations
.NET Core
.NET Core
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Linux
Linux
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
RxJava
RxJava
Zookeeper
Zookeeper

What are some alternatives to Azure Pipelines, Zuul CI?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana