Bamboo vs Github Actions

Overview

Bamboo

Stacks504

Followers549

Votes17

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

Bamboo vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Bamboo and Github Actions

Bamboo and GitHub Actions are both continuous integration and deployment tools that help automate software development processes. However, there are some key differences between the two:

Scalability: Bamboo offers better scalability with its distributed build feature, allowing users to distribute build jobs across multiple agents and machines. On the other hand, GitHub Actions may lack the robustness and scalability required for large-scale projects.
Integration with Git: GitHub Actions seamlessly integrates with Git, as it is a native feature of the GitHub platform. This integration enables developers to leverage the full potential of Git's branching and version control capabilities. Bamboo, while supporting Git, may not have the same level of integration and ease of use.
Community and Marketplace: GitHub Actions has a thriving community and marketplace, offering a wide variety of pre-built actions and workflows that developers can leverage. This makes it easier to find and implement automated solutions for common development tasks. Bamboo, on the other hand, may have a smaller community and fewer readily available resources.
Pricing Model: Bamboo follows a traditional pricing model based on the number of build agents and the size of the license. In contrast, GitHub Actions offers a more flexible pricing model, allowing a certain number of free build minutes per month and additional minutes for a cost. This makes it more cost-effective for smaller teams and projects.
Release Management: Bamboo provides advanced release management features, allowing users to plan, orchestrate, and deploy releases across multiple environments. GitHub Actions, being primarily focused on workflows and automation, may not offer the same level of dedicated release management capabilities.
Ecosystem: Bamboo has been a mature and established tool in the DevOps ecosystem for a longer time, with a wide range of integrations with other Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence. GitHub Actions, being relatively newer, is still evolving and expanding its ecosystem of integrations with third-party tools.

In summary, Bamboo offers better scalability, advanced release management, and a more established ecosystem, while GitHub Actions excels in Git integration, community support, pricing flexibility, and availability of pre-built actions. The choice between the two will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bamboo, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo	GitHub Actions
Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
-	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 504	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 549	Followers 3.1K
Votes 17	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Integrates with other Atlassian tools 4 Great notification scheme 2 Great UI 1 Has Deployment Projects Cons 6 Expensive 1 Low community support 1 Bad integration with docker 1 Bad UI	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Read actions in Marketplace Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No Deployment Projects
Integrations
Confluence Jira Bitbucket HipChat	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

Bamboo vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Bamboo and Github Actions

Bamboo and GitHub Actions are both continuous integration and deployment tools that help automate software development processes. However, there are some key differences between the two:

Scalability: Bamboo offers better scalability with its distributed build feature, allowing users to distribute build jobs across multiple agents and machines. On the other hand, GitHub Actions may lack the robustness and scalability required for large-scale projects.
Integration with Git: GitHub Actions seamlessly integrates with Git, as it is a native feature of the GitHub platform. This integration enables developers to leverage the full potential of Git's branching and version control capabilities. Bamboo, while supporting Git, may not have the same level of integration and ease of use.
Community and Marketplace: GitHub Actions has a thriving community and marketplace, offering a wide variety of pre-built actions and workflows that developers can leverage. This makes it easier to find and implement automated solutions for common development tasks. Bamboo, on the other hand, may have a smaller community and fewer readily available resources.
Pricing Model: Bamboo follows a traditional pricing model based on the number of build agents and the size of the license. In contrast, GitHub Actions offers a more flexible pricing model, allowing a certain number of free build minutes per month and additional minutes for a cost. This makes it more cost-effective for smaller teams and projects.
Release Management: Bamboo provides advanced release management features, allowing users to plan, orchestrate, and deploy releases across multiple environments. GitHub Actions, being primarily focused on workflows and automation, may not offer the same level of dedicated release management capabilities.
Ecosystem: Bamboo has been a mature and established tool in the DevOps ecosystem for a longer time, with a wide range of integrations with other Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence. GitHub Actions, being relatively newer, is still evolving and expanding its ecosystem of integrations with third-party tools.

Bamboo vs Github Actions

Overview

Bamboo vs Github Actions: What are the differences?