Bit vs Bitbucket

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Bit

Stacks42

Followers142

Votes0

GitHub Stars18.3K

Forks942

Bit vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Bit and Bitbucket, highlighting their key differences.

Integration with Other Tools: Bit allows seamless integration with popular development tools and frameworks such as React, Vue, and Angular. It offers a powerful command-line interface for easy collaboration among developers. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers comprehensive integration with Atlassian's suite of products, including Jira for issue tracking and Confluence for team collaboration.
Code Repository Management: Bit provides a distributed and decentralized Git-based code repository management system. It focuses on component-driven development, allowing developers to share and reuse components across projects. In contrast, Bitbucket is a centralized Git repository hosting service that enables developers to store, manage, and collaborate on their code repositories.
Pricing: Bit offers a free tier with limited features and usage, making it suitable for personal projects and small teams. It also provides flexible pricing plans for larger teams and enterprises. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with the free tier supporting up to 5 users. However, for larger teams and more advanced features, paid plans are available.
Code Review and Collaboration Features: Bit offers a rich set of code review and collaboration features. It allows developers to review, comment, and suggest changes on individual components, promoting effective collaboration. Bitbucket also offers similar code review features, allowing developers to review and collaborate on code changes through pull requests.
Continuous Integration and Deployment (CI/CD): Bit integrates with popular CI/CD platforms like Travis CI, CircleCI, and Jenkins, providing advanced automation and deployment capabilities. It allows developers to automate the build, test, and deployment processes for their components. On the other hand, Bitbucket provides built-in CI/CD capabilities with pipelines, allowing developers to configure and automate their development workflows.
Security and Permissions: Bit focuses on providing granular security and permissions controls, allowing administrators to manage access to specific components and repositories. It includes features like role-based access control, two-factor authentication, and auditing. Bitbucket also offers robust security features with fine-grained access controls, branch restrictions, and user management capabilities.

In summary, Bit and Bitbucket differ in terms of integration with other tools, code repository management approach, pricing plans, code review and collaboration features, CI/CD capabilities, and security and permissions controls.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Bit

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Bit
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	It is open source tool that helps you easily publish and manage reusable components. It help teams scale shared components to hundreds and even thousands of components, while eliminating the overhead around this process.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Share components and collaborate ;Reusable components; Help teams scale shared components
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 18.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 942
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 42
Followers 33.4K	Followers 142
Votes 2.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	GraphQL Git Vue.js Node.js React npm AngularJS Yarn

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Bit?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

Bit vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Bit and Bitbucket, highlighting their key differences.

Integration with Other Tools: Bit allows seamless integration with popular development tools and frameworks such as React, Vue, and Angular. It offers a powerful command-line interface for easy collaboration among developers. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers comprehensive integration with Atlassian's suite of products, including Jira for issue tracking and Confluence for team collaboration.
Code Repository Management: Bit provides a distributed and decentralized Git-based code repository management system. It focuses on component-driven development, allowing developers to share and reuse components across projects. In contrast, Bitbucket is a centralized Git repository hosting service that enables developers to store, manage, and collaborate on their code repositories.
Pricing: Bit offers a free tier with limited features and usage, making it suitable for personal projects and small teams. It also provides flexible pricing plans for larger teams and enterprises. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with the free tier supporting up to 5 users. However, for larger teams and more advanced features, paid plans are available.
Code Review and Collaboration Features: Bit offers a rich set of code review and collaboration features. It allows developers to review, comment, and suggest changes on individual components, promoting effective collaboration. Bitbucket also offers similar code review features, allowing developers to review and collaborate on code changes through pull requests.
Continuous Integration and Deployment (CI/CD): Bit integrates with popular CI/CD platforms like Travis CI, CircleCI, and Jenkins, providing advanced automation and deployment capabilities. It allows developers to automate the build, test, and deployment processes for their components. On the other hand, Bitbucket provides built-in CI/CD capabilities with pipelines, allowing developers to configure and automate their development workflows.
Security and Permissions: Bit focuses on providing granular security and permissions controls, allowing administrators to manage access to specific components and repositories. It includes features like role-based access control, two-factor authentication, and auditing. Bitbucket also offers robust security features with fine-grained access controls, branch restrictions, and user management capabilities.

Bit vs Bitbucket

Overview

Bit vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?