StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Load Testing
  4. Load And Performance Testing
  5. Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Stacks68
Followers158
Votes13
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Stacks435
Followers285
Votes10

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter: What are the differences?

Apache JMeter and BlazeMeter are both popular tools for load-testing web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Scalability: BlazeMeter offers a more scalable solution compared to Apache JMeter. It leverages the cloud infrastructure to distribute the load across multiple machines, making it suitable for testing large-scale applications. On the other hand, JMeter typically runs on a single machine and may have limitations in handling high loads.

  2. Ease of use: JMeter is known for its comprehensive features and flexibility, but it can be more complex to set up and configure. BlazeMeter, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop capabilities, making it easier for non-technical users to create and execute performance tests quickly.

  3. Reporting and analytics: BlazeMeter offers advanced reporting and analytics features, providing in-depth insights into test results. It offers real-time dashboards, trend analysis, and integration with third-party tools like Grafana and New Relic. JMeter, while it provides basic reporting capabilities, may require additional plugins or custom script development for advanced analytics.

  4. Collaboration and teamwork: BlazeMeter is designed to support collaboration and teamwork. It allows multiple team members to work on the same project simultaneously, share test plans, and collaborate on test scripts. JMeter, on the other hand, may require manual merging of changes made by different team members, making it less conducive to collaborative work.

  5. Integration and API testing: JMeter is highly extensible and provides extensive support for API testing. It allows users to add custom scripts and integrate with various protocols and technologies. BlazeMeter, while it supports API testing, may have some limitations and may not offer the same level of flexibility as JMeter.

  6. Cost and licensing: Apache JMeter is an open-source tool and is available for free. It can be downloaded and used without any licensing costs. BlazeMeter, on the other hand, offers both free and paid plans. The paid plans provide additional features, scalability, and support.

In summary, BlazeMeter provides a more scalable and user-friendly solution with advanced reporting and collaboration capabilities, while JMeter offers extensive flexibility, extensibility, and cost advantages as an open-source tool.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on BlazeMeter, Apache JMeter

Ratan
Ratan

QA Manager at Verisys

Feb 12, 2020

Needs advice

I have a team that is not heavy on programming skills. I am looking for a load testing tool that is easy to use. Preferably, the tool should be a record and playback tool without much programming. Also, the tool should be able to test APIs apart from web-based applications. What tool should I opt for?

36.3k views36.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions.

100% JMeter Compatible- Take full advantage of JMeter’s scripting capabilities or let our auto-scripting feature take care of the details.;Scalable and Realistic- Easily scale from 100 to 300,000+ concurrent users using realistic visitor behaviour and browser simulation.;Start Testing in 2 Minutes- Use up to 100 dedicated servers per test. No setup or installation required. Self-service and on-demand.;Intuitive Reporting- See test results in real time or easily compare multiple tests. All with a simple to use interface and intuitive graphs.;Pay only for what you need- Flexible pricing that accommodates hourly, monthly or annual usage. No setup or maintenance fees.<br>
-
Statistics
Stacks
68
Stacks
435
Followers
158
Followers
285
Votes
13
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.
  • 3
    Easy to prepare JMeter workers
Cons
  • 1
    Costly
  • 1
    UI centric
Pros
  • 5
    Requires no programming knowledge
  • 3
    Supports distributed
  • 2
    Open-source
Cons
  • 1
    Too complicated
  • 1
    It's GUI-first
Integrations
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bamboo
Bamboo
CloudBees
CloudBees
Heroku
Heroku
New Relic
New Relic
AppDynamics
AppDynamics
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Travis CI
Travis CI
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to BlazeMeter, Apache JMeter?

k6

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Gatling

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Loader.io

Loader.io

Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

RedLine13

RedLine13

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.

AWS Device Farm

AWS Device Farm

Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors.

Flood IO

Flood IO

Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.

Blitz

Blitz

Build bulletproof, scalable solutions with Blitz - a simple and fun service for load testing web apps and APIs in the cloud. Blitz offers powerful yet simple capabilities including continuous monitoring, performance testing and remediation. Blitz enables you to instantly burst up to 50,000 concurrent users against your app in seconds from multiple points of presence around the world.

LoadNinja

LoadNinja

It is  a  cloud-based platform for engineers and performance professionals who load test web applications. It makes load testing simple and fast. Test your website and web apps on real browsers, in the cloud, without the need for dynamic correlation.

Artillery

Artillery

It is a modern, open-source, powerful & easy-to-use performance testing toolkit. Use it to ship scalable applications that stay performant & resilient under high load. It prioritizes developer productivity and happiness and follows the “batteries-included” philosophy.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope