What is Brightcove and what are its top alternatives?
Brightcove is a leading online video platform that offers a wide range of features such as video hosting, monetization, analytics, and live streaming. Users can easily manage and publish video content across various devices and platforms. However, some limitations of Brightcove include high pricing for smaller businesses and limited customization options for advanced users.
Vimeo: Vimeo is a popular video platform known for its high-quality video hosting and customization options. It offers features such as video analytics, monetization tools, and easy integration with other platforms. Pros include user-friendly interface and affordable pricing plans, while cons include limited live streaming capabilities compared to Brightcove.
Wistia: Wistia is a video hosting platform that focuses on providing tools for marketers and businesses to create and analyze video content. Key features include customizable video players, lead generation tools, and detailed analytics. Pros include excellent customer support and intuitive interface, while cons include higher pricing for large amounts of video content.
Kaltura: Kaltura is an open-source video platform that offers video hosting, monetization, and live streaming solutions. It provides customizable features and high scalability for enterprise users. Pros include flexibility to customize the platform to specific needs and cost-effectiveness for large organizations, while cons include a steeper learning curve compared to Brightcove.
Ooyala: Ooyala is a video platform that offers robust video hosting, analytics, and monetization solutions for media companies and enterprises. Key features include advanced video analytics, ad insertion capabilities, and content recommendations. Pros include powerful video analytics tools and seamless integration with other platforms, while cons include limited customization options for smaller businesses.
JW Player: JW Player is a video platform that provides tools for video hosting, streaming, and player customization. It offers features such as video ad serving, interactive video experiences, and real-time analytics. Pros include easy integration with third-party services and high-quality video playback, while cons include higher pricing for advanced features compared to Brightcove.
SproutVideo: SproutVideo is a video hosting platform that focuses on providing secure video hosting, customizable branding, and detailed video analytics. Key features include password protection, viewer engagement tracking, and lead capture forms. Pros include high-level security features and easy-to-use interface, while cons include limited live streaming capabilities.
Vidyard: Vidyard is a video marketing platform that offers tools for video hosting, analytics, and personalized video messaging. It provides features such as video SEO optimization, video player customization, and lead generation tools. Pros include seamless integration with marketing automation platforms and advanced video analytics, while cons include higher pricing for advanced features compared to Brightcove.
Panopto: Panopto is a video platform that focuses on providing video hosting and management solutions for educational institutions and businesses. It offers features such as video search, live streaming, and interactive video quizzing. Pros include ease of use for educational purposes and comprehensive video content management tools, while cons include limited customization options for advanced users.
Uscreen: Uscreen is a video platform that enables users to create and monetize their own video streaming websites. Key features include video hosting, subscription management, and built-in marketing tools. Pros include all-in-one platform for launching video streaming services and customizable branding options, while cons include limited scalability for large organizations.
Zype: Zype is a video platform that offers video hosting, monetization, and distribution solutions for content creators and media companies. It provides features such as multi-platform video distribution, video monetization options, and audience analytics. Pros include easy integration with OTT platforms and comprehensive monetization tools, while cons include higher pricing for premium features.
Top Alternatives to Brightcove
- JW Player
It is the most powerful & flexible video platform powered by the fastest, most-used HTML5 online video player. Unlock the power of advertising. ...
- Wistia
It is designed exclusively to serve companies using video on their websites for marketing, support, and sales. ...
- Vidyard
Vidyard is a powerful video analytics and hosting platform designed for content marketers. Get the most out of your video assets with in-depth data on viewer behaviour that can be automatically pushed into your marketing automation system and/or CRM. ...
- Akamai
If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...
- Google Drive
Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...
- CloudFlare
Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...
- Dropbox
Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...
- Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...
Brightcove alternatives & related posts
related JW Player posts
Wistia
related Wistia posts
related Vidyard posts
Akamai
related Akamai posts
- Easy to use505
- Gmail integration326
- Enough free space312
- Collaboration268
- Stable service249
- Desktop and mobile apps128
- Offline sync97
- Apps79
- 15 gb storage74
- Add-ons50
- Integrates well9
- Easy to use6
- Simple back-up tool3
- Amazing2
- Beautiful2
- Fast upload speeds2
- The more the merrier2
- So easy2
- Wonderful2
- Linux terminal transfer tools2
- It has grown to a stable in the cloud office2
- UI1
- Windows desktop1
- G Suite integration1
- Organization via web ui sucks7
- Not a real database2
related Google Drive posts
Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.
I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?
Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?
- Easy setup, great cdn424
- Free ssl277
- Easy setup199
- Security190
- Ssl180
- Great cdn98
- Optimizer77
- Simple71
- Great UI44
- Great js cdn28
- Apps12
- HTTP/2 Support12
- DNS Analytics12
- AutoMinify12
- Rocket Loader9
- Ipv69
- Easy9
- IPv6 "One Click"8
- Fantastic CDN service8
- DNSSEC7
- Nice DNS7
- SSHFP7
- Free GeoIP7
- Amazing performance7
- API7
- Cheapest SSL7
- SPDY6
- Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else6
- Ubuntu5
- Asynchronous resource loading5
- Global Load Balancing4
- Performance4
- Easy Use4
- CDN3
- Registrar2
- Support for SSHFP records2
- Web31
- Прохси1
- HTTPS3/Quic1
- No support for SSHFP records2
- Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits2
related CloudFlare posts
Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.
When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.
One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.
Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding
of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.
When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells
, issues
, and other issues
I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.
I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.
- Easy to work with434
- Free256
- Popular216
- Shared file hosting176
- 'just works'167
- No brainer100
- Integration with external services79
- Simple76
- Good api49
- Least cost (free) for the basic needs case38
- It just works11
- Convenient8
- Accessible from all of my devices7
- Command Line client5
- Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere4
- Can even be used by your grandma4
- Reliable3
- Sync API3
- Mac app3
- Cross platform app3
- Ability to pay monthly without losing your files2
- Delta synchronization2
- Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably2
- Backups, local and cloud2
- Extended version history2
- Beautiful UI2
- YC Company1
- What a beautiful app1
- Easy/no setup1
- So easy1
- The more the merrier1
- Easy to work with1
- For when client needs file without opening firewall1
- Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl1
- Easy to use1
- Official Linux app1
- The more the merrier0
- Personal vs company account is confusing3
- Replication kills CPU and battery1
related Dropbox posts
I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?
Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?
Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers
Amazon CloudFront
- Fast245
- Cdn166
- Compatible with other aws services157
- Simple125
- Global108
- Cheap41
- Cost-effective36
- Reliable27
- One stop solution19
- Elastic9
- Object store1
- HTTP/2 Support1
- UI could use some work3
- Invalidations take so long1
related Amazon CloudFront posts
StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.
Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!
#StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit
Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.
I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.
For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.
Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.
Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.
Future improvements / technology decisions included:
Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic
As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.
One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.