Alternatives to Brightcove logo

Alternatives to Brightcove

JW Player, Wistia, Vidyard, Akamai, and Google Drive are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Brightcove.
14
0

What is Brightcove and what are its top alternatives?

Brightcove is a leading online video platform that offers a wide range of features such as video hosting, monetization, analytics, and live streaming. Users can easily manage and publish video content across various devices and platforms. However, some limitations of Brightcove include high pricing for smaller businesses and limited customization options for advanced users.

  1. Vimeo: Vimeo is a popular video platform known for its high-quality video hosting and customization options. It offers features such as video analytics, monetization tools, and easy integration with other platforms. Pros include user-friendly interface and affordable pricing plans, while cons include limited live streaming capabilities compared to Brightcove.

  2. Wistia: Wistia is a video hosting platform that focuses on providing tools for marketers and businesses to create and analyze video content. Key features include customizable video players, lead generation tools, and detailed analytics. Pros include excellent customer support and intuitive interface, while cons include higher pricing for large amounts of video content.

  3. Kaltura: Kaltura is an open-source video platform that offers video hosting, monetization, and live streaming solutions. It provides customizable features and high scalability for enterprise users. Pros include flexibility to customize the platform to specific needs and cost-effectiveness for large organizations, while cons include a steeper learning curve compared to Brightcove.

  4. Ooyala: Ooyala is a video platform that offers robust video hosting, analytics, and monetization solutions for media companies and enterprises. Key features include advanced video analytics, ad insertion capabilities, and content recommendations. Pros include powerful video analytics tools and seamless integration with other platforms, while cons include limited customization options for smaller businesses.

  5. JW Player: JW Player is a video platform that provides tools for video hosting, streaming, and player customization. It offers features such as video ad serving, interactive video experiences, and real-time analytics. Pros include easy integration with third-party services and high-quality video playback, while cons include higher pricing for advanced features compared to Brightcove.

  6. SproutVideo: SproutVideo is a video hosting platform that focuses on providing secure video hosting, customizable branding, and detailed video analytics. Key features include password protection, viewer engagement tracking, and lead capture forms. Pros include high-level security features and easy-to-use interface, while cons include limited live streaming capabilities.

  7. Vidyard: Vidyard is a video marketing platform that offers tools for video hosting, analytics, and personalized video messaging. It provides features such as video SEO optimization, video player customization, and lead generation tools. Pros include seamless integration with marketing automation platforms and advanced video analytics, while cons include higher pricing for advanced features compared to Brightcove.

  8. Panopto: Panopto is a video platform that focuses on providing video hosting and management solutions for educational institutions and businesses. It offers features such as video search, live streaming, and interactive video quizzing. Pros include ease of use for educational purposes and comprehensive video content management tools, while cons include limited customization options for advanced users.

  9. Uscreen: Uscreen is a video platform that enables users to create and monetize their own video streaming websites. Key features include video hosting, subscription management, and built-in marketing tools. Pros include all-in-one platform for launching video streaming services and customizable branding options, while cons include limited scalability for large organizations.

  10. Zype: Zype is a video platform that offers video hosting, monetization, and distribution solutions for content creators and media companies. It provides features such as multi-platform video distribution, video monetization options, and audience analytics. Pros include easy integration with OTT platforms and comprehensive monetization tools, while cons include higher pricing for premium features.

Top Alternatives to Brightcove

  • JW Player
    JW Player

    It is the most powerful & flexible video platform powered by the fastest, most-used HTML5 online video player. Unlock the power of advertising. ...

  • Wistia
    Wistia

    It is designed exclusively to serve companies using video on their websites for marketing, support, and sales. ...

  • Vidyard
    Vidyard

    Vidyard is a powerful video analytics and hosting platform designed for content marketers. Get the most out of your video assets with in-depth data on viewer behaviour that can be automatically pushed into your marketing automation system and/or CRM. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

Brightcove alternatives & related posts

JW Player logo

JW Player

27
54
0
The solution for seamless video playback across browsers
27
54
+ 1
0
PROS OF JW PLAYER
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JW PLAYER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related JW Player posts

      Wistia logo

      Wistia

      84
      48
      0
      Video marketing software that makes it easy to find, engage, and grow your audience
      84
      48
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF WISTIA
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF WISTIA
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Wistia posts

          Vidyard logo

          Vidyard

          16
          16
          0
          Turn your video content into powerful marketing tools
          16
          16
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF VIDYARD
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF VIDYARD
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Vidyard posts

              Akamai logo

              Akamai

              1.9K
              439
              0
              The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
              1.9K
              439
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF AKAMAI
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF AKAMAI
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Akamai posts

                  Google Drive logo

                  Google Drive

                  81.9K
                  68.1K
                  2.1K
                  A safe place for all your files
                  81.9K
                  68.1K
                  + 1
                  2.1K
                  PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
                  • 505
                    Easy to use
                  • 326
                    Gmail integration
                  • 312
                    Enough free space
                  • 268
                    Collaboration
                  • 249
                    Stable service
                  • 128
                    Desktop and mobile apps
                  • 97
                    Offline sync
                  • 79
                    Apps
                  • 74
                    15 gb storage
                  • 50
                    Add-ons
                  • 9
                    Integrates well
                  • 6
                    Easy to use
                  • 3
                    Simple back-up tool
                  • 2
                    Amazing
                  • 2
                    Beautiful
                  • 2
                    Fast upload speeds
                  • 2
                    The more the merrier
                  • 2
                    So easy
                  • 2
                    Wonderful
                  • 2
                    Linux terminal transfer tools
                  • 2
                    It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
                  • 1
                    UI
                  • 1
                    Windows desktop
                  • 1
                    G Suite integration
                  CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
                  • 7
                    Organization via web ui sucks
                  • 2
                    Not a real database

                  related Google Drive posts

                  Tom Klein

                  Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

                  See more
                  Shared insights
                  on
                  Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

                  I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

                  Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

                  See more
                  CloudFlare logo

                  CloudFlare

                  76.6K
                  22.5K
                  1.8K
                  The Web Performance & Security Company.
                  76.6K
                  22.5K
                  + 1
                  1.8K
                  PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
                  • 424
                    Easy setup, great cdn
                  • 277
                    Free ssl
                  • 199
                    Easy setup
                  • 190
                    Security
                  • 180
                    Ssl
                  • 98
                    Great cdn
                  • 77
                    Optimizer
                  • 71
                    Simple
                  • 44
                    Great UI
                  • 28
                    Great js cdn
                  • 12
                    Apps
                  • 12
                    HTTP/2 Support
                  • 12
                    DNS Analytics
                  • 12
                    AutoMinify
                  • 9
                    Rocket Loader
                  • 9
                    Ipv6
                  • 9
                    Easy
                  • 8
                    IPv6 "One Click"
                  • 8
                    Fantastic CDN service
                  • 7
                    DNSSEC
                  • 7
                    Nice DNS
                  • 7
                    SSHFP
                  • 7
                    Free GeoIP
                  • 7
                    Amazing performance
                  • 7
                    API
                  • 7
                    Cheapest SSL
                  • 6
                    SPDY
                  • 6
                    Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
                  • 5
                    Ubuntu
                  • 5
                    Asynchronous resource loading
                  • 4
                    Global Load Balancing
                  • 4
                    Performance
                  • 4
                    Easy Use
                  • 3
                    CDN
                  • 2
                    Registrar
                  • 2
                    Support for SSHFP records
                  • 1
                    Web3
                  • 1
                    Прохси
                  • 1
                    HTTPS3/Quic
                  CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
                  • 2
                    No support for SSHFP records
                  • 2
                    Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

                  related CloudFlare posts

                  Tom Klein

                  Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

                  See more
                  Johnny Bell

                  When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

                  One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

                  Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

                  When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

                  I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

                  See more
                  Dropbox logo

                  Dropbox

                  23.3K
                  18.2K
                  1.7K
                  Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
                  23.3K
                  18.2K
                  + 1
                  1.7K
                  PROS OF DROPBOX
                  • 434
                    Easy to work with
                  • 256
                    Free
                  • 216
                    Popular
                  • 176
                    Shared file hosting
                  • 167
                    'just works'
                  • 100
                    No brainer
                  • 79
                    Integration with external services
                  • 76
                    Simple
                  • 49
                    Good api
                  • 38
                    Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
                  • 11
                    It just works
                  • 8
                    Convenient
                  • 7
                    Accessible from all of my devices
                  • 5
                    Command Line client
                  • 4
                    Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
                  • 4
                    Can even be used by your grandma
                  • 3
                    Reliable
                  • 3
                    Sync API
                  • 3
                    Mac app
                  • 3
                    Cross platform app
                  • 2
                    Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
                  • 2
                    Delta synchronization
                  • 2
                    Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
                  • 2
                    Backups, local and cloud
                  • 2
                    Extended version history
                  • 2
                    Beautiful UI
                  • 1
                    YC Company
                  • 1
                    What a beautiful app
                  • 1
                    Easy/no setup
                  • 1
                    So easy
                  • 1
                    The more the merrier
                  • 1
                    Easy to work with
                  • 1
                    For when client needs file without opening firewall
                  • 1
                    Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
                  • 1
                    Easy to use
                  • 1
                    Official Linux app
                  • 0
                    The more the merrier
                  CONS OF DROPBOX
                  • 3
                    Personal vs company account is confusing
                  • 1
                    Replication kills CPU and battery

                  related Dropbox posts

                  Shared insights
                  on
                  Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

                  I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

                  Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

                  See more
                  Shared insights
                  on
                  BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

                  Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

                  See more
                  Amazon CloudFront logo

                  Amazon CloudFront

                  21.3K
                  10.7K
                  935
                  Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
                  21.3K
                  10.7K
                  + 1
                  935
                  PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
                  • 245
                    Fast
                  • 166
                    Cdn
                  • 157
                    Compatible with other aws services
                  • 125
                    Simple
                  • 108
                    Global
                  • 41
                    Cheap
                  • 36
                    Cost-effective
                  • 27
                    Reliable
                  • 19
                    One stop solution
                  • 9
                    Elastic
                  • 1
                    Object store
                  • 1
                    HTTP/2 Support
                  CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
                  • 3
                    UI could use some work
                  • 1
                    Invalidations take so long

                  related Amazon CloudFront posts

                  Russel Werner
                  Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.8M views

                  StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

                  Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

                  #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

                  See more
                  Julien DeFrance
                  Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

                  Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

                  I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

                  For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

                  Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

                  Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

                  Future improvements / technology decisions included:

                  Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

                  As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

                  One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

                  See more