StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs Ghostlab

BrowserStack vs Ghostlab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533
Ghostlab
Ghostlab
Stacks10
Followers20
Votes0

BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

  1. BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Testing Capabilities BrowserStack allows for cross-browser testing on a wide range of devices and operating systems, providing a comprehensive testing environment. In contrast, Ghostlab focuses on synchronized testing across multiple devices, making it more suitable for testing responsive design elements.

  2. BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Collaborative Features BrowserStack offers features for team collaboration, such as sharing live test environments and test reports, enabling a seamless collaborative testing workflow. Ghostlab lacks extensive collaborative features, focusing more on individual testing needs.

  3. BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Integration with Development Tools BrowserStack integrates well with popular development tools like Jenkins, Jira, and Slack, streamlining the testing process and facilitating automated testing workflows. Ghostlab, on the other hand, is more focused on providing a standalone testing environment rather than extensive integrations.

  4. BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Scalability BrowserStack is designed for scalability, allowing testing on a large number of real devices simultaneously, making it suitable for handling high-volume testing requirements. Ghostlab is better suited for smaller-scale testing scenarios due to its focus on synchronized testing on a limited number of devices.

  5. BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Pricing BrowserStack offers a variety of pricing plans to accommodate different needs, including free trials and pay-as-you-go options, making it flexible for both individuals and enterprises. Ghostlab has a single pricing model, which may be less accommodating for those with varying testing requirements and budgets.

  6. BrowserStack vs Ghostlab: Support and Documentation BrowserStack provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and responsive customer support to assist users with onboarding and troubleshooting, ensuring a smooth testing experience. Ghostlab may have limited support resources, potentially leading to challenges in resolving issues efficiently.

In Summary, BrowserStack and Ghostlab differ in testing capabilities, collaborative features, integration with development tools, scalability, pricing, and support resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on BrowserStack, Ghostlab

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Ghostlab
Ghostlab

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

It is a Mac based app that allows you to test out your responsive design across a variety of devices and browsers

Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
Synchronized browsing; Screenshots; Inspect CSS on any device; Debug JavaScript anywhere; Auto-refresh and style injection; Compile Sass, Pug & more; Automagic form filling
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
10
Followers
2.0K
Followers
20
Votes
533
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Cucumber
Cucumber
Grunt
Grunt
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Ghostlab?

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana