Code Climate vs SonarQube

Overview

Code Climate

Stacks740

Followers497

Votes285

SonarQube

Stacks1.9K

Followers2.0K

Votes53

GitHub Stars10.0K

Forks2.1K

Code Climate vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Code Climate and SonarQube are both popular code review and analysis tools used by developers and teams to improve the quality of their code. Let's explore the key difference between them.

Scalability: Code Climate is designed for small to medium-sized codebases, making it easier to set up and maintain. On the other hand, SonarQube is more suitable for larger codebases, providing better scalability and handling a higher volume of code.
Language Support: Code Climate has broader language support, including popular programming languages such as JavaScript, Ruby, Python, and Java. SonarQube, on the other hand, supports a more extensive range of programming languages, making it suitable for a diverse set of codebases.
Integration Options: Code Climate offers integration with popular version control systems like Git and GitHub, allowing for seamless code review within the development workflow. SonarQube also offers similar integrations but provides additional integrations with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, allowing for continuous code analysis and quality monitoring.
Rule Customization: SonarQube provides more flexibility in customizing and defining rules for code analysis. This allows teams to tailor the analysis to their specific requirements and coding standards. Code Climate, on the other hand, provides predefined rulesets and limited options for customization.
Community and Ecosystem: SonarQube has a larger and more active community, offering extensive support, plugins, and extensions. The ecosystem around SonarQube provides a wide range of additional features, making it a popular choice for many development teams. Code Climate, while still having an active community, may have a smaller ecosystem and fewer available plugins.
Pricing Model: Code Climate follows a subscription-based pricing model, offering different plans based on the team's size and requirements. SonarQube, on the other hand, is an open-source tool with a community edition that is free to use, but it also offers commercial editions with additional features and support.

In summary, Code Climate is better suited for small to medium-sized codebases with its ease of setup and maintenance, while SonarQube is preferred for larger codebases with its scalability and extensive language support. SonarQube provides more flexibility in customization and has a larger community and ecosystem, while Code Climate has better integration options and a subscription-based pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Code Climate	SonarQube
After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.	SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.;Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.;Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.;Team Sharing- Instant access for your whole team to maximize code visibility across projects.;Hotspots- A hit list for refactoring. Target your messiest areas one-by-one.;Duplication Detection- Fuzzy matching algorithm finds DRY-violations that human reviewers might miss.;Email Notification- Instant email notifications to let you know when new security and code issues arise;Security Dashboard- Organized listing of your app's vulnerabilities, including when they were first introduced and how to address them.;Alerts for New Rails Disclosures- Going beyond Gemfile analysis to let you know whether you're at high risk based on how your specific code uses a vulnerable library.;Start Fixing with One Click- Full integration with Pivotal Tracker, GitHub Issues, and Lighthouse lets you open tickets instantly.;GitHub Integration- Post-receive hooks for instant updates and GitHub drilldown links throughout.;Test Coverage Integration- Surfacing coverage information at the repo, class, and source listing level.;Private, Safe, and Secure- All data is private by default. SSL encryption everywhere.	Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 10.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.1K
Stacks 740	Stacks 1.9K
Followers 497	Followers 2.0K
Votes 285	Votes 53
Pros & Cons
Pros 71 Auto sync with Github 49 Simple grade system that motivates to keep code clean 45 Better coding 30 Free for open source 21 Hotspots for quick refactoring candidates Cons 2 Learning curve, static analysis comparable to eslint 1 Complains about small stylistic decisions	Pros 26 Tracks code complexity and smell trends 16 IDE Integration 9 Complete code Review 2 Difficult to deploy Cons 7 Sales process is long and unfriendly 7 Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful 1 Does not integrate with Snyk
Integrations
GitHub HipChat Campfire Semaphore	Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins TeamCity Appveyor Travis CI Apache Ant Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Code Climate, SonarQube?

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

bitHound

With faster deployment cycles, a hundred competing priorities and tight deadlines to juggle– your team has a lot on their plate. Uncover and focus on the critical issues impacting your team, avoid software pitfalls and ship with confidence.

Related Comparisons

Code Climate vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Code Climate and SonarQube are both popular code review and analysis tools used by developers and teams to improve the quality of their code. Let's explore the key difference between them.

Scalability: Code Climate is designed for small to medium-sized codebases, making it easier to set up and maintain. On the other hand, SonarQube is more suitable for larger codebases, providing better scalability and handling a higher volume of code.
Language Support: Code Climate has broader language support, including popular programming languages such as JavaScript, Ruby, Python, and Java. SonarQube, on the other hand, supports a more extensive range of programming languages, making it suitable for a diverse set of codebases.
Integration Options: Code Climate offers integration with popular version control systems like Git and GitHub, allowing for seamless code review within the development workflow. SonarQube also offers similar integrations but provides additional integrations with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, allowing for continuous code analysis and quality monitoring.
Rule Customization: SonarQube provides more flexibility in customizing and defining rules for code analysis. This allows teams to tailor the analysis to their specific requirements and coding standards. Code Climate, on the other hand, provides predefined rulesets and limited options for customization.
Community and Ecosystem: SonarQube has a larger and more active community, offering extensive support, plugins, and extensions. The ecosystem around SonarQube provides a wide range of additional features, making it a popular choice for many development teams. Code Climate, while still having an active community, may have a smaller ecosystem and fewer available plugins.
Pricing Model: Code Climate follows a subscription-based pricing model, offering different plans based on the team's size and requirements. SonarQube, on the other hand, is an open-source tool with a community edition that is free to use, but it also offers commercial editions with additional features and support.

Code Climate vs SonarQube

Overview