Alternatives to Epsagon logo

Alternatives to Epsagon

Dashbird, Datadog, New Relic, Sentry, and TrackJS are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Epsagon.
24
31
+ 1
6

What is Epsagon and what are its top alternatives?

Epsagon enables teams to instantly visualize, understand and optimize their microservice architectures. With our unique lightweight auto-instrumentation, gaps in data and manual work associated with other APM solutions are eliminated, provi
Epsagon is a tool in the Exception Monitoring category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Epsagon

  • Dashbird

    Dashbird

    Dashbird gives full visibility into serverless architectures. Failure detection, monitoring and debugging capabilities for AWS Lambda and event sources. Get up and running in 5 minutes without any performance overhead or code changes. ...

  • Datadog

    Datadog

    Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog! ...

  • New Relic

    New Relic

    The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too. ...

  • Sentry

    Sentry

    Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health. ...

  • TrackJS

    TrackJS

    Production error monitoring and reporting for web applications. TrackJS provides deep insights into real user errors. See the user, network, and application events that tell the story of an error so you can actually fix them. ...

  • Rollbar

    Rollbar

    Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra ...

  • Bugsnag

    Bugsnag

    Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast. ...

  • Airbrake

    Airbrake

    Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast. ...

Epsagon alternatives & related posts

Dashbird logo

Dashbird

23
29
6
Monitoring and troubleshooting for serverless applications
23
29
+ 1
6
PROS OF DASHBIRD
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Great overview in seconds
  • 1
    Actionable insights
  • 1
    Good centralized view for the tech leads
CONS OF DASHBIRD
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Dashbird posts

    Datadog logo

    Datadog

    6.1K
    5.3K
    792
    Unify logs, metrics, and traces from across your distributed infrastructure.
    6.1K
    5.3K
    + 1
    792
    PROS OF DATADOG
    • 133
      Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)
    • 104
      Easy setup
    • 84
      Powerful ui
    • 81
      Powerful integrations
    • 68
      Great value
    • 52
      Great visualization
    • 44
      Events + metrics = clarity
    • 40
      Custom metrics
    • 39
      Notifications
    • 37
      Flexibility
    • 17
      Free & paid plans
    • 14
      Great customer support
    • 13
      Makes my life easier
    • 8
      Adapts automatically as i scale up
    • 8
      Easy setup and plugins
    • 6
      Super easy and powerful
    • 5
      In-context collaboration
    • 5
      AWS support
    • 4
      Rich in features
    • 3
      Docker support
    • 3
      Cost
    • 3
      Best than others
    • 2
      Source control and bug tracking
    • 2
      Easy to Analyze
    • 2
      Expensive
    • 2
      Cute logo
    • 2
      Good for Startups
    • 2
      Free setup
    • 2
      Monitor almost everything
    • 2
      Automation tools
    • 2
      Simple, powerful, great for infra
    • 2
      Full visibility of applications
    • 1
      Best in the field
    CONS OF DATADOG
    • 16
      Expensive
    • 3
      No errors exception tracking
    • 2
      External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging
    • 1
      Complicated

    related Datadog posts

    Robert Zuber

    Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We’ve got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We’ve definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven’t had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We’ve started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we’ve seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.

    We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.

    See more

    We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

    We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

    We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

    You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

    See more
    New Relic logo

    New Relic

    18.6K
    6.7K
    1.9K
    New Relic is the industry’s largest and most comprehensive cloud-based observability platform.
    18.6K
    6.7K
    + 1
    1.9K
    PROS OF NEW RELIC
    • 414
      Easy setup
    • 344
      Really powerful
    • 244
      Awesome visualization
    • 194
      Ease of use
    • 151
      Great ui
    • 107
      Free tier
    • 81
      Great tool for insights
    • 66
      Heroku Integration
    • 55
      Market leader
    • 49
      Peace of mind
    • 21
      Push notifications
    • 20
      Email notifications
    • 17
      Heroku Add-on
    • 16
      Error Detection and Alerting
    • 12
      Multiple language support
    • 11
      SQL Analysis
    • 11
      Server Resources Monitoring
    • 9
      Transaction Tracing
    • 8
      Apdex Scores
    • 8
      Azure Add-on
    • 7
      Analysis of CPU, Disk, Memory, and Network
    • 6
      Detailed reports
    • 6
      Performance of External Services
    • 6
      Error Analysis
    • 6
      Application Availability Monitoring and Alerting
    • 6
      Application Response Times
    • 5
      JVM Performance Analyzer (Java)
    • 5
      Most Time Consuming Transactions
    • 4
      Top Database Operations
    • 4
      Easy to use
    • 4
      Browser Transaction Tracing
    • 3
      Application Map
    • 3
      Pagoda Box integration
    • 3
      Custom Dashboards
    • 3
      Weekly Performance Email
    • 2
      Easy visibility
    • 2
      App Speed Index
    • 2
      Easy to setup
    • 1
      Real User Monitoring Analysis and Breakdown
    • 1
      Incident Detection and Alerting
    • 1
      Real User Monitoring Overview
    • 1
      Worst Transactions by User Dissatisfaction
    • 1
      Metric Data Resolution
    • 1
      Metric Data Retention
    • 1
      Team Collaboration Tools
    • 1
      Super Expensive
    • 1
      Time Comparisons
    • 1
      Access to Performance Data API
    • 1
      Background Jobs Transaction Analysis
    • 1
      Free
    • 1
      Best of the best, what more can you ask for
    • 1
      Best monitoring on the market
    • 1
      Rails integration
    • 0
      Exceptions
    • 0
      Ddd
    CONS OF NEW RELIC
    • 19
      Pricing model doesn't suit microservices
    • 10
      UI isn't great
    • 7
      Visualizations aren't very helpful
    • 7
      Expensive
    • 5
      Hard to understand why things in your app are breaking

    related New Relic posts

    Farzeem Diamond Jiwani
    Software Engineer at IVP · | 5 upvotes · 657.5K views

    Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

    Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

    Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

    Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

    Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

    Please advise on the above. Thanks!

    See more
    Sebastian Gębski

    Regarding Continuous Integration - we've started with something very easy to set up - CircleCI , but with time we're adding more & more complex pipelines - we use Jenkins to configure & run those. It's much more effort, but at some point we had to pay for the flexibility we expected. Our source code version control is Git (which probably doesn't require a rationale these days) and we keep repos in GitHub - since the very beginning & we never considered moving out. Our primary monitoring these days is in New Relic (Ruby & SPA apps) and AppSignal (Elixir apps) - we're considering unifying it in New Relic , but this will require some improvements in Elixir app observability. For error reporting we use Sentry (a very popular choice in this class) & we collect our distributed logs using Logentries (to avoid semi-manual handling here).

    See more
    Sentry logo

    Sentry

    10.5K
    6.5K
    849
    See performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize code health.
    10.5K
    6.5K
    + 1
    849
    PROS OF SENTRY
    • 234
      Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy
    • 120
      Email Notifications
    • 107
      Open source
    • 83
      Slack integration
    • 70
      Github integration
    • 48
      Easy
    • 43
      User-friendly interface
    • 28
      The most important tool we use in production
    • 18
      Hipchat integration
    • 17
      Heroku Integration
    • 15
      Good documentation
    • 13
      Free tier
    • 9
      Self-hosted
    • 8
      Easy setup
    • 7
      Realiable
    • 6
      Provides context, and great stack trace
    • 4
      Feedback form on error pages
    • 4
      Love it baby
    • 3
      Easy Integration
    • 3
      Gitlab integration
    • 3
      Super user friendly
    • 3
      Filter by custom tags
    • 3
      Captures local variables at each frame in backtraces
    CONS OF SENTRY
    • 10
      Confusing UI

    related Sentry posts

    Johnny Bell

    For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

    I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

    I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

    After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

    I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

    See more
    TrackJS logo

    TrackJS

    3.3K
    188
    22
    JavaScript Error Monitoring for Modern Web Applications
    3.3K
    188
    + 1
    22
    PROS OF TRACKJS
    • 12
      Great error reporting
    • 2
      Great experience. Neat reporting
    • 2
      Awesome engineer support
    • 2
      Easy Setup
    • 2
      Telemetry Timeline
    • 1
      Realtime alerts
    • 1
      Slack Integration
    • 0
      Vivastreet
    CONS OF TRACKJS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related TrackJS posts

      Rollbar logo

      Rollbar

      1.5K
      995
      514
      Proactively discover, predict, and remediate errors.
      1.5K
      995
      + 1
      514
      PROS OF ROLLBAR
      • 72
        Consolidates similar errors by impact
      • 63
        Centralize error management
      • 62
        Slack integration
      • 57
        Github integration
      • 46
        Usage based pricing
      • 31
        Insane customer support
      • 22
        Instant search
      • 20
        Heroku integration
      • 17
        Consolidate errors by OS
      • 14
        Great Free Plan
      • 14
        Trello integration
      • 12
        Flexible logging (not just exceptions)
      • 10
        Simple yet powerful error tracking tool
      • 8
        Multiple Language Support
      • 6
        Consolidate errors by browser
      • 6
        Query errors with RQL
      • 6
        Easy setup
      • 5
        Awesome service
      • 5
        Deployment tracking is a nice free bonus
      • 5
        Best rails exception handler
      • 5
        Simple and fast integration
      • 4
        Easy setup, friendly ui, demo, lots of integrations
      • 3
        Errors Analysis
      • 3
        Server-side + client-side
      • 3
        Clear and concise information.
      • 3
        Powerful
      • 3
        Beat your users to the error report
      • 2
        Easy integration with sails.js
      • 2
        Bitbucket integration
      • 2
        Mailgun integration
      • 1
        Clear errors on deploy or push
      • 1
        Gitlab integration
      • 1
        Easy Set up familiar UI that doesn't make you look dumb
      CONS OF ROLLBAR
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Rollbar posts

        Robert Zuber

        Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We’ve got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We’ve definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven’t had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We’ve started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we’ve seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.

        We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.

        See more
        Bugsnag logo

        Bugsnag

        1.1K
        542
        266
        Bugsnag provides production error monitoring and management for front-end, mobile and back-end applications
        1.1K
        542
        + 1
        266
        PROS OF BUGSNAG
        • 45
          Lots of 3rd party integrations
        • 42
          Really reliable
        • 36
          Includes a free plan
        • 25
          No usage or rate limits
        • 23
          Design
        • 21
          Slack integration
        • 21
          Responsive support
        • 19
          Free tier
        • 11
          Unlimited
        • 6
          No Rate
        • 5
          Email notifications
        • 3
          Great customer support
        • 3
          React Native
        • 3
          Integrates well with Laravel
        • 3
          Reliable, great UI and insights, used for all our apps
        CONS OF BUGSNAG
        • 1
          Error grouping doesn't always work

        related Bugsnag posts

        Johnny Bell

        For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

        I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

        I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

        After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

        I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

        See more
        James Smith
        Co-founder and CEO at James Smith · | 1 upvote · 199.2K views
        Shared insights
        on
        LeakCanaryLeakCanaryBugsnagBugsnag
        at

        There’s a tool called LeakCanary that was built by the team at Square. It detects memory allocations and can spot when this scenario is occurring. LeakCanary has been billed as a memory leak detection library for #Android (and you’ll be happy to know there’s a Bugsnag integration for it as well!).

        See more
        Airbrake logo

        Airbrake

        253
        271
        128
        Airbrake captures and groups errors in Ruby, iOS, Django, PHP & more.
        253
        271
        + 1
        128
        PROS OF AIRBRAKE
        • 28
          Reliable
        • 25
          Consolidates similar errors
        • 22
          Easy setup
        • 15
          Slack Integration
        • 10
          Github Integration
        • 7
          Email notifications
        • 6
          Includes a free plan
        • 5
          Android Application to view errors.
        • 4
          Search and filtering
        • 4
          Shows request parameters
        • 2
          Heroku integration
        CONS OF AIRBRAKE
        • 0
          Rejects error report if non-latin characters exists

        related Airbrake posts