Matomo vs etracker

Overview

etracker

Stacks3

Followers5

Votes0

Matomo

Stacks1.9K

Followers173

Votes6

Matomo vs etracker: What are the differences?

Data Privacy and Ownership: Matomo allows users to have full control over their data by self-hosting the analytics platform, ensuring data privacy and ownership. Meanwhile, etracker collects and stores data on their servers, raising concerns about data privacy and ownership.
Real-time Data Reporting: Matomo offers real-time data reporting, enabling users to view up-to-the-minute analytics. In comparison, etracker provides near real-time data reporting, which may lead to slight delays in accessing the most recent data.
Customization and Flexibility: Matomo provides extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the analytics platform to their specific needs and preferences. On the other hand, etracker offers limited customization, restricting users from fully adapting the platform to their requirements.
Integration with Third-party Tools: Matomo integrates seamlessly with various third-party tools and platforms, facilitating a cohesive analytics ecosystem. In contrast, etracker has limited integrations with other tools, potentially hindering the ability to combine data from different sources.
Cost Structure: Matomo is an open-source platform with no licensing fees, making it cost-effective for businesses of all sizes. Meanwhile, etracker operates on a subscription-based model, requiring users to pay regular fees for access to the analytics platform.
Support and Community: Matomo boasts a large and active community that provides support, resources, and updates for users. In contrast, etracker offers personalized support but may lack the breadth and depth of a community-driven platform like Matomo.

In Summary, the key differences between Matomo and etracker lie in data privacy, real-time reporting, customization, integrations, cost structure, and support/community engagement.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

etracker	Matomo
It is a proprietary scanning system and software technology that works with off-the-shelf scanners and the forms you currently use for: Behavior-based Safety.	It is a web analytics platform designed to give you the conclusive insights with our complete range of features. You can also evaluate the full user-experience of your visitor’s behaviour with its Conversion Optimization features, including Heatmaps, Sessions Recordings, Funnels, Goals, Form Analytics and A/B Testing.
Case Management; Complaint Classification; Corrective Actions (CAPA); Customer Complaint Tracking; Feedback Management; Forms Management; Issue Tracking; Quality Assurance Management.	Powerful Web Analytics Platform; GDPR Manager
Statistics
Stacks 3	Stacks 1.9K
Followers 5	Followers 173
Votes 0	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 Self-hosted 1 Goals tracking 1 Updated regulary 1 Free 1 Full data control
Integrations
Optimize Optimizely Google Tag Manager Squarespace KISSmetrics Segment CloudFlare	MySQL React

What are some alternatives to etracker, Matomo?

Google Analytics

Google Analytics lets you measure your advertising ROI as well as track your Flash, video, and social networking sites and applications.

Mixpanel

Mixpanel helps companies build better products through data. With our powerful, self-serve product analytics solution, teams can easily analyze how and why people engage, convert, and retain to improve their user experience.

Piwik

Matomo (formerly Piwik) is a full-featured PHP MySQL software program that you download and install on your own webserver. At the end of the five-minute installation process, you will be given a JavaScript code.

Clicky

Clicky Web Analytics gives bloggers and smaller web sites a more personal understanding of their visitors. Clicky has various features that helps stand it apart from the competition specifically Spy and RSS feeds that allow web site owners to get live information about their visitors.

Plausible

It is a lightweight and open-source website analytics tool. It doesn’t use cookies and is fully compliant with GDPR, CCPA and PECR.

Databricks

Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, from the original creators of Apache Spark™, unifies data science and engineering across the Machine Learning lifecycle from data preparation to experimentation and deployment of ML applications.

userTrack

userTrack is now called UXWizz. Get access to better insights, a faster dashboard and increase user privacy. It provides detailed visitor insights without relying on third-parties.

Quickmetrics

It is a service for collecting, analyzing and visualizing custom metrics. It can be used to track anything from signups to server response times. Sending events is super simple.

Maze

Maze empowers product and marketing teams to test anything from prototypes to copy, or round up user feedback—all in one place. Rapidly collect user insights across teams and create better user experiences, together.

Ackee (Analytics)

Self-hosted, Node.js based analytics tool for those who care about privacy. Ackee runs on your own server, analyses the traffic of your websites and provides useful statistics in a minimal interface.

Related Comparisons

Matomo vs etracker: What are the differences?

Data Privacy and Ownership: Matomo allows users to have full control over their data by self-hosting the analytics platform, ensuring data privacy and ownership. Meanwhile, etracker collects and stores data on their servers, raising concerns about data privacy and ownership.
Real-time Data Reporting: Matomo offers real-time data reporting, enabling users to view up-to-the-minute analytics. In comparison, etracker provides near real-time data reporting, which may lead to slight delays in accessing the most recent data.
Customization and Flexibility: Matomo provides extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the analytics platform to their specific needs and preferences. On the other hand, etracker offers limited customization, restricting users from fully adapting the platform to their requirements.
Integration with Third-party Tools: Matomo integrates seamlessly with various third-party tools and platforms, facilitating a cohesive analytics ecosystem. In contrast, etracker has limited integrations with other tools, potentially hindering the ability to combine data from different sources.
Cost Structure: Matomo is an open-source platform with no licensing fees, making it cost-effective for businesses of all sizes. Meanwhile, etracker operates on a subscription-based model, requiring users to pay regular fees for access to the analytics platform.
Support and Community: Matomo boasts a large and active community that provides support, resources, and updates for users. In contrast, etracker offers personalized support but may lack the breadth and depth of a community-driven platform like Matomo.

In Summary, the key differences between Matomo and etracker lie in data privacy, real-time reporting, customization, integrations, cost structure, and support/community engagement.

Matomo vs etracker

Overview