StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitBucket vs GitHub

GitBucket vs GitHub

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
GitBucket
GitBucket
Stacks79
Followers177
Votes36

GitBucket vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitBucket and GitHub are both web-based services that provide hosting and version control for Git repositories. While they share similarities, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Pricing and Licensing: GitBucket is an open-source project and is free to use. It can be self-hosted, allowing users to host their own instance on their own server. On the other hand, GitHub offers both free and paid plans, with additional features available for paid users. It is a hosted service, meaning the repositories are stored on GitHub's servers.

  2. User Interface and Features: GitHub has a more polished and user-friendly interface, designed to facilitate collaboration and social aspects of software development. It provides features like pull requests, issue tracking, and project management tools that make it easier for developers to work together. GitBucket, being an open-source project, has a simpler interface and lacks some of the advanced features provided by GitHub.

  3. Integration and Ecosystem: GitHub has a larger ecosystem and is widely adopted in the industry. It integrates well with a wide range of third-party tools and services, making it easier to incorporate it into existing workflows. GitBucket, although it has a smaller user base, still has support for various integrations and plugins.

  4. Deployment and Customization: GitBucket can be self-hosted, allowing users to have complete control over their installations. This enables customization and integration with existing infrastructure. GitHub, being a hosted service, does not offer the same level of flexibility in terms of deployment and customization.

  5. Community and Support: GitHub has a large and active community, providing a platform for collaboration and knowledge sharing among developers. It has extensive documentation and support resources, making it easier for users to find answers to their questions. GitBucket, being less popular, has a smaller community and fewer support resources available.

  6. Enterprise Solutions: GitHub offers enterprise solutions that cater to the specific needs of larger organizations. These solutions provide additional security features, enhanced collaboration capabilities, and advanced administration tools. GitBucket, being an open-source project, does not offer the same level of enterprise-grade features and support.

In summary, GitBucket is an open-source, self-hosted solution with a simpler interface and lacks some advanced features provided by GitHub. GitHub, on the other hand, is a hosted service with a polished user interface, extensive ecosystem, and enterprise-grade solutions available.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, GitBucket

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Phillip
Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
GitBucket
GitBucket

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access);Repository viewer and online file editing;Repository search (Code and Issues);Wiki;Issues;Fork / Pull request;Mail notification;Activity timeline;User management (for Administrators);Group (like Organization in Github);LDAP integration;Gravatar support
Statistics
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
79
Followers
259.0K
Followers
177
Votes
10.4K
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 8
    Self hosted
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Familiar interface
  • 5
    Scala
  • 5
    Simple setup
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GitHub, GitBucket?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana