StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Google Cloud Endpoints vs KrakenD

Google Cloud Endpoints vs KrakenD

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Endpoints
Google Cloud Endpoints
Stacks36
Followers149
Votes1
KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9

Google Cloud Endpoints vs KrakenD: What are the differences?

<Google Cloud Endpoints and KrakenD are both API Gateway solutions that allow developers to build, deploy, and manage APIs efficiently. Here are the key differences between the two platforms:>

  1. Deployment Environment: Google Cloud Endpoints is specifically designed for deployment on Google Cloud Platform, providing seamless integration with other Google services such as Cloud Functions, App Engine, and Kubernetes Engine. In contrast, KrakenD is agnostic to the deployment environment and can be deployed on any cloud provider or on-premise infrastructure, offering more flexibility and portability.

  2. Developer Experience: Google Cloud Endpoints offers a more user-friendly and developer-focused experience with features like OpenAPI Specification support, Cloud Console for monitoring and managing APIs, and automatic client libraries generation. On the other hand, KrakenD is focused on performance and speed, providing a lightweight and customizable solution for high-demand use cases with features like caching layers, load balancing, and middleware support.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Google Cloud Endpoints is managed by Google and is optimized for scalability and reliability with built-in features like global load balancing, health checks, and distributed tracing. KrakenD, on the other hand, boasts high performance and efficiency with features like connection pooling, request batching, and hot reloading of configurations, making it suitable for handling large volumes of requests efficiently.

  4. Security Features: Google Cloud Endpoints provides robust security features such as Identity-Aware Proxy integration, OAuth 2.0 support, and API key management for authentication and authorization. KrakenD also offers security features like SSL/TLS encryption, rate limiting, and IP whitelisting for protecting APIs from potential threats, ensuring data confidentiality and integrity.

  5. Cost Consideration: Google Cloud Endpoints is a fully managed service on Google Cloud Platform, which means users will incur costs based on usage and resource consumption. In contrast, KrakenD is an open-source solution that can be self-hosted, offering cost savings for organizations that have specific budget constraints or prefer to manage their own infrastructure.

  6. Community Support and Documentation: Google Cloud Endpoints benefits from the extensive support and documentation provided by Google Cloud Platform, making it easier for developers to get started and troubleshoot issues. KrakenD, being open-source, has an active community of users and contributors who provide support, tutorials, and resources for implementing and optimizing the platform based on real-world use cases.

In Summary, Google Cloud Endpoints is more tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform, user-friendly, scalable, and secure, while KrakenD offers deployment flexibility, performance optimization, cost-effectiveness, and strong community support for API management solutions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Endpoints
Google Cloud Endpoints
KrakenD
KrakenD

An NGINX-based proxy and distributed architecture give unparalleled performance and scalability. Using an Open API Specification or one of our API frameworks, Cloud Endpoints gives you the tools you need for every phase of API development and provides insight with Google Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Trace, Google Cloud Logging and Cloud Trace.

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

-
Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Statistics
Stacks
36
Stacks
59
Followers
149
Followers
158
Votes
1
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Android Integration
Pros
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 1
    GitOps oriented
  • 1
    Easiest to install
Integrations
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Endpoints, KrakenD?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope