Alternatives to Instabug logo

Alternatives to Instabug

Crashlytics, Bugsee, Bugsnag, Sentry, and Firebase are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Instabug.
80
114
+ 1
279

What is Instabug and what are its top alternatives?

Instabug is a comprehensive bug reporting and user feedback platform that allows developers to receive detailed bug reports and feedback from beta testers and users. It offers in-app feedback forms, crash reporting, screen recording, and user surveys. However, Instabug has limitations in terms of pricing for small teams and limited customization options for the feedback forms.

  1. Bugsnag: Bugsnag provides error monitoring and stability management for mobile apps, helping developers to detect and diagnose crashes. Key features include real-time alerts, stack traces, and detailed error reports. Pros: Detailed crash reporting, integrations with various platforms. Cons: Limited free plan options.
  2. Sentry: Sentry is an open-source error tracking platform that helps developers monitor and fix crashes in real-time. It offers features like stack traces, breadcrumbs, and release tracking. Pros: Open-source, real-time error monitoring. Cons: Complex setup process.
  3. Raygun: Raygun offers application performance monitoring and crash reporting tools for mobile and web applications. It provides detailed crash reports, performance monitoring, and user tracking. Pros: User session tracking, performance monitoring. Cons: Limited customization options.
  4. Rollbar: Rollbar is an error monitoring and troubleshooting tool that helps developers discover, diagnose, and resolve software errors. It offers real-time error tracking, customizable dashboards, and integrations with popular tools. Pros: Real-time error monitoring, easy setup. Cons: Limited features on lower-tier plans.
  5. Airbrake: Airbrake is an error monitoring and tracking tool that helps developers debug applications faster. It offers features like error grouping, detailed error reports, and integrations with popular tools. Pros: Easy setup, detailed error reports. Cons: Limited customization options.
  6. TrackJS: TrackJS is a JavaScript error monitoring tool that helps developers track, catch, and fix JavaScript errors on web applications. It provides real-time error notifications, detailed stack traces, and actionable insights. Pros: Real-time error tracking, actionable insights. Cons: Limited support for other languages.
  7. Backtrace.io: Backtrace.io is a platform for error monitoring and crash reporting that helps developers identify and resolve application crashes. It offers advanced crash analysis, detailed crash reports, and integrations with popular issue tracking tools. Pros: Advanced crash analysis, detailed reports. Cons: Higher cost compared to other options.
  8. LogRocket: LogRocket is a logging and error monitoring tool for web applications that helps developers identify, diagnose, and fix bugs faster. It offers session replay, performance monitoring, and detailed error reports. Pros: Session replay, performance monitoring. Cons: Limited support for mobile applications.
  9. Honeybadger: Honeybadger is an error monitoring and troubleshooting tool that provides real-time error notifications, detailed stack traces, and integrations with popular platforms. Pros: Real-time error monitoring, detailed stack traces. Cons: Limited features on the basic plan.
  10. OverOps: OverOps is a continuous reliability platform that helps developers monitor code quality, detect and resolve production issues, and prevent downtime. It offers automatic root cause analysis, contextual insights, and detailed error analysis. Pros: Automatic root cause analysis, contextual insights. Cons: Higher cost compared to similar tools.

Top Alternatives to Instabug

  • Crashlytics
    Crashlytics

    Instead of just showing you the stack trace, Crashlytics performs deep analysis of each and every thread. We de-prioritize lines that don't matter while highlighting the interesting ones. This makes reading stack traces easier, faster, and far more useful! Crashlytics' intelligent grouping can take 50,000 crashes, distill them down to 20 unique issues, and then tell you which 3 are the most important to fix. ...

  • Bugsee
    Bugsee

    See video, network and logs that led to bugs and crashes in live apps. No need to reproduce intermittent bugs. With Bugsee, all the crucial data is always there. ...

  • Bugsnag
    Bugsnag

    Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast. ...

  • Sentry
    Sentry

    Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health. ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • TestFairy
    TestFairy

    When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more. ...

  • Fabric
    Fabric

    Fabric is a Python (2.5-2.7) library and command-line tool for streamlining the use of SSH for application deployment or systems administration tasks. It provides a basic suite of operations for executing local or remote shell commands (normally or via sudo) and uploading/downloading files, as well as auxiliary functionality such as prompting the running user for input, or aborting execution. ...

  • Crittercism
    Crittercism

    Crittercism, based in San Francisco, California, is the world’s first mobile application performance management (APM) solution. The company’s products monitor every aspect of mobile app performance, allowing Developers and IT Operations to deliver high performing, highly reliable, highly available mobile apps. Crittercism provides a real-time global view of app diagnostics and crashes across iOS, Android, Windows Phone 8, Hybrid and HTML5 apps and is used on more than 800 million unique devices and in more than 250 billion app sessions. The company’s investors include Google Ventures, Opus Capital and Shasta Ventures. ...

Instabug alternatives & related posts

Crashlytics logo

Crashlytics

1K
614
340
The world's most powerful, yet lightest weight crash reporting solution. Free for everybody.
1K
614
+ 1
340
PROS OF CRASHLYTICS
  • 78
    Crash tracking
  • 56
    Mobile exception tracking
  • 53
    Free
  • 37
    Easy deployment
  • 25
    Ios
  • 15
    Great ui
  • 11
    Great reports
  • 10
    Android
  • 8
    Advanced Logging
  • 7
    Monitor Tester Lifecycle
  • 3
    Mac APP and IDE Plugins
  • 3
    Great User Experience
  • 3
    In Real-Time
  • 3
    iOS SDK
  • 3
    Security
  • 3
    Android SDK
  • 2
    The UI is simple and it just works
  • 2
    Best UI
  • 2
    Light
  • 2
    Real-time
  • 2
    Seamless
  • 2
    Painless App Distribution
  • 2
    Crash Reporting
  • 2
    Beta distribution
  • 2
    Mobile Analytics
  • 2
    Deep Workflow Integration
  • 1
    IOS QA Deploy and tracking
  • 1
    Easy iOS Integration
CONS OF CRASHLYTICS
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Crashlytics posts

    Bugsee logo

    Bugsee

    2
    13
    0
    See video, network traffic & logs leading up to bugs or crashes
    2
    13
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF BUGSEE
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF BUGSEE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Bugsee posts

        Bugsnag logo

        Bugsnag

        1.1K
        618
        267
        Bugsnag provides production error monitoring and management for front-end, mobile and back-end applications
        1.1K
        618
        + 1
        267
        PROS OF BUGSNAG
        • 45
          Lots of 3rd party integrations
        • 42
          Really reliable
        • 37
          Includes a free plan
        • 25
          No usage or rate limits
        • 23
          Design
        • 21
          Slack integration
        • 21
          Responsive support
        • 19
          Free tier
        • 11
          Unlimited
        • 6
          No Rate
        • 5
          Email notifications
        • 3
          Great customer support
        • 3
          React Native
        • 3
          Integrates well with Laravel
        • 3
          Reliable, great UI and insights, used for all our apps
        CONS OF BUGSNAG
        • 2
          Error grouping doesn't always work
        • 2
          Bad billing model

        related Bugsnag posts

        Johnny Bell

        For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

        I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

        I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

        After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

        I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

        See more
        James Smith
        Co-founder and CEO at James Smith · | 1 upvote · 232.6K views
        Shared insights
        on
        LeakCanaryLeakCanaryBugsnagBugsnag
        at

        There’s a tool called LeakCanary that was built by the team at Square. It detects memory allocations and can spot when this scenario is occurring. LeakCanary has been billed as a memory leak detection library for #Android (and you’ll be happy to know there’s a Bugsnag integration for it as well!).

        See more
        Sentry logo

        Sentry

        14.1K
        9.1K
        863
        See performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize code health.
        14.1K
        9.1K
        + 1
        863
        PROS OF SENTRY
        • 237
          Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy
        • 121
          Email Notifications
        • 108
          Open source
        • 84
          Slack integration
        • 71
          Github integration
        • 49
          Easy
        • 44
          User-friendly interface
        • 28
          The most important tool we use in production
        • 18
          Hipchat integration
        • 17
          Heroku Integration
        • 15
          Good documentation
        • 14
          Free tier
        • 11
          Self-hosted
        • 9
          Easy setup
        • 7
          Realiable
        • 6
          Provides context, and great stack trace
        • 4
          Feedback form on error pages
        • 4
          Love it baby
        • 3
          Gitlab integration
        • 3
          Filter by custom tags
        • 3
          Super user friendly
        • 3
          Captures local variables at each frame in backtraces
        • 3
          Easy Integration
        • 1
          Performance measurements
        CONS OF SENTRY
        • 12
          Confusing UI
        • 4
          Bundle size

        related Sentry posts

        Johnny Bell

        For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

        I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

        I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

        After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

        I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

        See more
        Paurush Rai
        Full Stack Developer at Fuelbuddy · | 4 upvotes · 4.4K views
        Shared insights
        on
        StackdriverStackdriverSentrySentryDatadogDatadog

        Need advice on this.

        Which one should I use for logging and error monitoring ( Datadog / Sentry / Stackdriver )?

        Open to any other solutions.

        See more
        Firebase logo

        Firebase

        40K
        34.4K
        2K
        The Realtime App Platform
        40K
        34.4K
        + 1
        2K
        PROS OF FIREBASE
        • 371
          Realtime backend made easy
        • 270
          Fast and responsive
        • 242
          Easy setup
        • 215
          Real-time
        • 191
          JSON
        • 134
          Free
        • 128
          Backed by google
        • 83
          Angular adaptor
        • 68
          Reliable
        • 36
          Great customer support
        • 32
          Great documentation
        • 25
          Real-time synchronization
        • 21
          Mobile friendly
        • 18
          Rapid prototyping
        • 14
          Great security
        • 12
          Automatic scaling
        • 11
          Freakingly awesome
        • 8
          Chat
        • 8
          Angularfire is an amazing addition!
        • 8
          Super fast development
        • 6
          Built in user auth/oauth
        • 6
          Firebase hosting
        • 6
          Ios adaptor
        • 6
          Awesome next-gen backend
        • 4
          Speed of light
        • 4
          Very easy to use
        • 3
          Great
        • 3
          It's made development super fast
        • 3
          Brilliant for startups
        • 2
          Free hosting
        • 2
          Cloud functions
        • 2
          JS Offline and Sync suport
        • 2
          Low battery consumption
        • 2
          .net
        • 2
          The concurrent updates create a great experience
        • 2
          Push notification
        • 2
          I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
        • 2
          Great all-round functionality
        • 2
          Free authentication solution
        • 1
          Easy Reactjs integration
        • 1
          Google's support
        • 1
          Free SSL
        • 1
          CDN & cache out of the box
        • 1
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Large
        • 1
          Faster workflow
        • 1
          Serverless
        • 1
          Good Free Limits
        • 1
          Simple and easy
        CONS OF FIREBASE
        • 31
          Can become expensive
        • 16
          No open source, you depend on external company
        • 15
          Scalability is not infinite
        • 9
          Not Flexible Enough
        • 7
          Cant filter queries
        • 3
          Very unstable server
        • 3
          No Relational Data
        • 2
          Too many errors
        • 2
          No offline sync

        related Firebase posts

        Stephen Gheysens
        Lead Solutions Engineer at Inscribe · | 14 upvotes · 1.8M views

        Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

        My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

        See more
        Tassanai Singprom

        This is my stack in Application & Data

        JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

        My Utilities Tools

        Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

        My Devops Tools

        Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

        My Business Tools

        Slack

        See more
        TestFairy logo

        TestFairy

        41
        76
        29
        Painless Beta Testing
        41
        76
        + 1
        29
        PROS OF TESTFAIRY
        • 8
          Get video rec of the user on your app
        • 4
          Landing Page
        • 4
          Better design
        • 3
          JIRA Integration
        • 2
          Cross-platform
        • 2
          Supports Enterprise IPA's (TestFlight doesn't/didn't)
        • 2
          GitHub Integration
        • 1
          Application full Log information
        • 1
          In-App Feedback
        • 1
          Single Sign-On
        • 1
          App Distribution
        CONS OF TESTFAIRY
          Be the first to leave a con

          related TestFairy posts

          Fabric logo

          Fabric

          451
          305
          75
          Simple, Pythonic remote execution and deployment
          451
          305
          + 1
          75
          PROS OF FABRIC
          • 23
            Python
          • 21
            Simple
          • 5
            Low learning curve, from bash script to Python power
          • 5
            Installation feedback for Twitter App Cards
          • 3
            Easy on maintainance
          • 3
            Single config file
          • 3
            Installation? pip install fabric... Boom
          • 3
            Easy to add any type of job
          • 3
            Agentless
          • 2
            Easily automate any set system automation
          • 1
            Flexible
          • 1
            Crash Analytics
          • 1
            Backward compatibility
          • 1
            Remote sudo execution
          CONS OF FABRIC
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Fabric posts

            Crittercism logo

            Crittercism

            22
            39
            14
            Mobile App Performance Management (APM) for iOS, Android, HTML5 and Windows Phone 8
            22
            39
            + 1
            14
            PROS OF CRITTERCISM
            • 3
              Great customer support
            • 2
              Easy to set up
            • 2
              Great ui
            • 2
              Role-based access control security
            • 2
              Powerful reporting, easy of setup and use
            • 2
              Multiple os & device support
            • 1
              Supports most platforms
            CONS OF CRITTERCISM
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Crittercism posts