IronMQ vs Mosca

Overview

IronMQ

Stacks35

Followers49

Votes36

Mosca

Stacks16

Followers43

Votes0

IronMQ vs Mosca: What are the differences?

Developers describe IronMQ as "Message Queue for any deployment". An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance. On the other hand, Mosca is detailed as "A Node.js MQTT broker". A Node.js MQTT broker, which can be used as a Standalone Service or embedded in another Node.js application.

IronMQ and Mosca can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools.

Some of the features offered by IronMQ are:

Instant High Availability- Runs on top cloud infrastructures and uses multiple high-availability data centers. Uses reliable datastores for message durability and persistence.
Easy to Use- IronMQ is super easy to use. Simply connect directly to the API endpoints and you're ready to create and use queues. There are also client libraries available in any language you want – Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, .NET, Go, Node.JS, and more
Scalable / High Performance- Built using high-performance languages designed for concurrency and runs on industrial-strength clouds. Push messages and stream data at will without worrying about memory limits or adding more servers.

On the other hand, Mosca provides the following key features:

MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 compliant
QoS 0 and QoS 1
Various storage options for QoS 1 offline packets, and subscriptions

Mosca is an open source tool with 2.84K GitHub stars and 501 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Mosca's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in Background Jobs on StackShare

Solid Queue Background Jobs

Database-backed active job backend

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Detailed Comparison

IronMQ	Mosca
An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.	A Node.js MQTT broker, which can be used as a Standalone Service or embedded in another Node.js application.
Instant High Availability- Runs on top cloud infrastructures and uses multiple high-availability data centers. Uses reliable datastores for message durability and persistence.;Easy to Use- IronMQ is super easy to use. Simply connect directly to the API endpoints and you're ready to create and use queues. There are also client libraries available in any language you want – Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, .NET, Go, Node.JS, and more;Scalable / High Performance- Built using high-performance languages designed for concurrency and runs on industrial-strength clouds. Push messages and stream data at will without worrying about memory limits or adding more servers.;Realtime Monitoring- Get realtime monitoring of your message queues through IronMQ's beautiful dashboard. This allows you to quickly find, diagnose, and resolve problems before others notice.;One-time FIFO delivery;Push Queues and publish-subscribe support;Queue messages using webhooks	MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 compliant; QoS 0 and QoS 1; Various storage options for QoS 1 offline packets, and subscriptions; Usable inside ANY other Node.js app;
Statistics
Stacks 35	Stacks 16
Followers 49	Followers 43
Votes 36	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 Great Support 8 Heroku Add-on 3 Push support 3 Delayed delivery upto 7 days 2 Ease of configuration Cons 1 Can't use rabbitmqadmin	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon EC2 Heroku Engine Yard Cloud Rackspace Cloud Servers Red Hat OpenShift StackMob AppFog cloudControl	Node.js

What are some alternatives to IronMQ, Mosca?

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.