Magnum CI vs wercker

Overview

Magnum CI

Stacks9

Followers21

Votes17

wercker

Stacks392

Followers156

Votes242

Magnum CI vs wercker: What are the differences?

Integration with Docker: Magnum CI has native support for Docker, allowing you to run your builds and tests in Docker containers seamlessly. On the other hand, Wercker also supports Docker, but the integration might not be as seamless as Magnum CI.
Pricing Model: Magnum CI offers simple and transparent pricing based on the number of concurrent builds you need, making it easy to budget for your CI/CD needs. In contrast, Wercker has a slightly more complex pricing model that includes a free tier but may require scaling up for larger projects.
Customization Options: Wercker provides a higher level of customization for your pipelines and workflows, allowing you to tailor your CI/CD process to fit your specific requirements. Magnum CI, while still offering customization options, may not be as flexible or extensive as Wercker in this aspect.
Community Support: Wercker boasts a strong and active community of users and contributors, providing a wealth of resources and support for troubleshooting issues and sharing best practices. Magnum CI, although it has a supportive community, may not have the same level of engagement and resources as Wercker's community.
Built-In Deployment Options: Wercker offers built-in deployment options to various platforms and services, simplifying the deployment process for your applications. Magnum CI, while supporting integrations with deployment tools, may not have the same level of built-in deployment options as Wercker.
Ease of Use: Magnum CI prides itself on its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easy for both beginners and advanced users to navigate and utilize its features effectively. Wercker, while not lacking in usability, may have a steeper learning curve for users who are not as familiar with CI/CD tools.

In Summary, Magnum CI and Wercker differ in their approach to Docker integration, pricing models, customization options, community support, deployment options, and ease of use for users.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Magnum CI, wercker

Vladyslav

Sr. Directory of Technology at Shelf

Apr 16, 2021

Decided

We migrated all our CI/CD pipelines to CircleCI back in 2017 and are particularly happy about it since!

Our top loved feature is unlimited parallelism. We can run as many builds concurrently as we want.

We also use orbs, pipeline parameters, reusable commands, build cache, test insights.

For some of the heavier repos, we use a larger resource class and mount RAMdisk to a file system to speed up builds.

52.2k views52.2k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Magnum CI	wercker
Magnum CI is a hosted continuous integration service for private projects. It supports multiple languages and tools to run test suite. Service supports all major version control software and integrates with most popular code hosting platforms. There are no restrictions or limitations on where you store your source code, so even your own self-hosted repository will work right away.	Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.
Easy Integration;Flexible Builds;Code Metrics; Build Notifications	Pipelines - Wercker's Pipelines enable developers to fully automate builds, tests and deployments with Docker as a first class citizen.; Workflows - With Workflows: a collection of pipelines can be chained and triggered to achieve complex automation goals.; Steps Store - A step is a self contained best practice for accomplishing a specific automation task. Build your own or help yourself to our community based store.; Security - We manage the nodes and schedulers, and run your jobs utilising a network isolated approach; we take care of all security patches and updates.; Deploy - Wercker is customisable and integrates with a variety of deploy targets and supports registries.
Statistics
Stacks 9	Stacks 392
Followers 21	Followers 156
Votes 17	Votes 242
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Free 4 Easy setup 3 Github integration 2 Gitlab integration 1 Bitbucket integration	Pros 35 Automatic Deployments 33 Free 25 Easy config via yaml 23 Github integration 23 Awesome UI
Integrations
Slack Flowdock HipChat Campfire GitHub Bitbucket Beanstalk	Bitbucket GitHub Red Hat OpenShift Heroku Docker

What are some alternatives to Magnum CI, wercker?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

Magnum CI vs wercker: What are the differences?

Integration with Docker: Magnum CI has native support for Docker, allowing you to run your builds and tests in Docker containers seamlessly. On the other hand, Wercker also supports Docker, but the integration might not be as seamless as Magnum CI.
Pricing Model: Magnum CI offers simple and transparent pricing based on the number of concurrent builds you need, making it easy to budget for your CI/CD needs. In contrast, Wercker has a slightly more complex pricing model that includes a free tier but may require scaling up for larger projects.
Customization Options: Wercker provides a higher level of customization for your pipelines and workflows, allowing you to tailor your CI/CD process to fit your specific requirements. Magnum CI, while still offering customization options, may not be as flexible or extensive as Wercker in this aspect.
Community Support: Wercker boasts a strong and active community of users and contributors, providing a wealth of resources and support for troubleshooting issues and sharing best practices. Magnum CI, although it has a supportive community, may not have the same level of engagement and resources as Wercker's community.
Built-In Deployment Options: Wercker offers built-in deployment options to various platforms and services, simplifying the deployment process for your applications. Magnum CI, while supporting integrations with deployment tools, may not have the same level of built-in deployment options as Wercker.
Ease of Use: Magnum CI prides itself on its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easy for both beginners and advanced users to navigate and utilize its features effectively. Wercker, while not lacking in usability, may have a steeper learning curve for users who are not as familiar with CI/CD tools.

In Summary, Magnum CI and Wercker differ in their approach to Docker integration, pricing models, customization options, community support, deployment options, and ease of use for users.

Magnum CI vs wercker

Overview