Mendix vs OutSystems

Overview

Mendix

Stacks41

Followers56

Votes0

GitHub Stars160

Forks754

OutSystems

Stacks76

Followers106

Votes0

Mendix vs OutSystems: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Mendix and OutSystems are outlined below:

1. **Development Approach**: Mendix focuses on visual development with a low-code platform that allows users to drag and drop components, making it ideal for citizen developers. On the other hand, OutSystems supports both low-code and traditional development approaches, offering more flexibility for advanced developers.
2. **Deployment Options**: Mendix offers cloud-based deployment as its primary option, providing scalability and ease of management. Meanwhile, OutSystems allows deployment on-premises, in private or public clouds, giving users more control over where their applications are hosted.
3. **Customization Capabilities**: Mendix favours simplicity and ease of use, limiting the extent of customizations that can be made to applications. In contrast, OutSystems allows for more extensive customizations through coding, catering to users with specific and complex requirements.
4. **Integration Capabilities**: Mendix provides a wide array of out-of-the-box connectors for seamless integration with various systems and databases. OutSystems, on the other hand, offers a robust integration framework that allows integration with legacy systems, IoT devices, and other platforms.
5. **User Interface Design**: Mendix offers a user-friendly interface design tool that simplifies the process of creating visually appealing applications. OutSystems provides a more comprehensive set of UI design tools, allowing for greater customization and creativity in application design.
6. **Scalability and Performance**: Mendix is known for its scalability and efficiency in handling large volumes of data and users, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. OutSystems also excels in scalability and performance, ensuring reliable performance even under heavy workloads.

In Summary, Mendix and OutSystems differ in their development approach, deployment options, customization capabilities, integration capabilities, user interface design, and scalability/performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mendix	OutSystems
It is a low-code software platform. It provides tools to build, test, deploy and iterate applications.	OutSystems is a low-code platform to visually develop your application, integrate with existing systems and add your own code when needed.
Centralized App Governance; Drag & Drop Forms Builder; Enterprise Integration; Model-Driven Development; Multi-Channel, Multi-Device; Public/Private App Stores.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 160	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 754	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 41	Stacks 76
Followers 56	Followers 106
Votes 0	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Cons 1 Price 0 Perfomamnce 0 Maturidade
Integrations
Jira Swagger Inspector GitHub Confluence Webex Mandrill	Firebase Microsoft Azure PayPal Mailchimp Asana Marketo Kubernetes Oracle Docker Slack

What are some alternatives to Mendix, OutSystems?

Parse

With Parse, you can add a scalable and powerful backend in minutes and launch a full-featured app in record time without ever worrying about server management. We offer push notifications, social integration, data storage, and the ability to add rich custom logic to your app’s backend with Cloud Code.

built.io

Built.io Backend is an mBaaS that allows you to avoid designing, building, and supporting a custom backend for your mobile & web applications. Enterprises can dramatically reduce cost, lower risk and accelerate time-to-market for apps.

Appcelerator

Appcelerator is the first mobile platform to combine the flexibility of open source development technologies with the power of cloud services.

DreamFactory

DreamFactory is an open source REST API backend for mobile, web, and IoT applications. It provides RESTful web services with pre-built connectors to SQL, NoSQL, file storage systems, and web services. It's secure, reusable, and offers live API documentation.

Kinvey

Kinvey makes it ridiculously easy for developers to setup, use and operate a cloud backend for their mobile apps. They don't have to worry about connecting to various cloud services, setting up servers for their backend, or maintaining and scaling them.

AWS Mobile Hub

AWS Mobile Hub is the fastest way to build mobile apps powered by AWS. It lets you easily add and configure features for your apps, including user authentication, data storage, backend logic, push notifications, content delivery, and analytics. After you build your app, AWS Mobile Hub gives you easy access to testing on real devices, as well as analytics dashboards to track usage of your app – all from a single, integrated console.

StackMob

StackMob is the most robust & flexible end-to-end platform on the market. StackMob lowers the barriers to application development, letting developers focus on creating powerful apps with quality user experiences.

Cloudmine

Whether you're building something from scratch or need to unlock legacy data, CloudMine frees you of managing a backend and lets you focus on developing great apps for the web and mobile devices across all platforms

Kumulos

It is the only white-label, multi-tenant mobile application performance management platform specifically developed for Mobile App Development Companies.

Related Comparisons

Mendix vs OutSystems: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Mendix and OutSystems are outlined below:

1. **Development Approach**: Mendix focuses on visual development with a low-code platform that allows users to drag and drop components, making it ideal for citizen developers. On the other hand, OutSystems supports both low-code and traditional development approaches, offering more flexibility for advanced developers.
2. **Deployment Options**: Mendix offers cloud-based deployment as its primary option, providing scalability and ease of management. Meanwhile, OutSystems allows deployment on-premises, in private or public clouds, giving users more control over where their applications are hosted.
3. **Customization Capabilities**: Mendix favours simplicity and ease of use, limiting the extent of customizations that can be made to applications. In contrast, OutSystems allows for more extensive customizations through coding, catering to users with specific and complex requirements.
4. **Integration Capabilities**: Mendix provides a wide array of out-of-the-box connectors for seamless integration with various systems and databases. OutSystems, on the other hand, offers a robust integration framework that allows integration with legacy systems, IoT devices, and other platforms.
5. **User Interface Design**: Mendix offers a user-friendly interface design tool that simplifies the process of creating visually appealing applications. OutSystems provides a more comprehensive set of UI design tools, allowing for greater customization and creativity in application design.
6. **Scalability and Performance**: Mendix is known for its scalability and efficiency in handling large volumes of data and users, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. OutSystems also excels in scalability and performance, ensuring reliable performance even under heavy workloads.

In Summary, Mendix and OutSystems differ in their development approach, deployment options, customization capabilities, integration capabilities, user interface design, and scalability/performance.

Mendix vs OutSystems

Overview