Alternatives to NCrunch logo

Alternatives to NCrunch

ReSharper, NUnit, Sentry, TrackJS, and Rollbar are the most popular alternatives and competitors to NCrunch.
5
4
+ 1
0

What is NCrunch and what are its top alternatives?

It is an automated concurrent testing tool for Visual Studio. It intelligently runs automated tests so that you don't have to, while giving you amazingly useful information about your tested code, such as code coverage and performance metrics, inline in your IDE while you type.
NCrunch is a tool in the Tools for Text Editors category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to NCrunch

  • ReSharper
    ReSharper

    It is a popular developer productivity extension for Microsoft Visual Studio. It automates most of what can be automated in your coding routines. It finds compiler errors, runtime errors, redundancies, and code smells right as you type, suggesting intelligent corrections for them. ...

  • NUnit
    NUnit

    An evolving, open source framework designed for writing and running tests in Microsoft .NET programming languages.It is an aspect of test-driven development , which is part of a larger software design paradigm known as Extreme Programming ...

  • Sentry
    Sentry

    Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health. ...

  • TrackJS
    TrackJS

    Production error monitoring and reporting for web applications. TrackJS provides deep insights into real user errors. See the user, network, and application events that tell the story of an error so you can actually fix them. ...

  • Rollbar
    Rollbar

    Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra ...

  • Bugsnag
    Bugsnag

    Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast. ...

  • Airbrake
    Airbrake

    Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast. ...

  • Spacemacs
    Spacemacs

    Since version 0.101.0 and later Spacemacs totally abolishes the frontiers between Vim and Emacs. The user can now choose his/her preferred editing style and enjoy all the Spacemacs features. Even better, it is possible to dynamically switch between the two styles seamlessly which makes it possible for programmers with different styles to do seat pair programming using the same editor. ...

NCrunch alternatives & related posts

ReSharper logo

ReSharper

207
216
18
A Visual Studio extension for .NET and web developers
207
216
+ 1
18
PROS OF RESHARPER
  • 5
    Refactor also using different code
  • 4
    Early discover bugs
  • 4
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Highlighted //todo //bug
  • 2
    Spell checking
CONS OF RESHARPER
  • 8
    Visual studio become slower

related ReSharper posts

NUnit logo

NUnit

167
112
0
An open-source unit testing framework
167
112
+ 1
0
PROS OF NUNIT
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF NUNIT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related NUnit posts

      We are looking for a Testing Tool that can integrate with Java/ React/ Go/ Python/ Node.js. Which amongst the three tools JUnit, NUnit & Selenium would be the best for this use case?

      See more
      Sentry logo

      Sentry

      11.2K
      7.3K
      858
      See performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize code health.
      11.2K
      7.3K
      + 1
      858
      PROS OF SENTRY
      • 235
        Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy
      • 121
        Email Notifications
      • 108
        Open source
      • 84
        Slack integration
      • 71
        Github integration
      • 48
        Easy
      • 44
        User-friendly interface
      • 28
        The most important tool we use in production
      • 18
        Hipchat integration
      • 17
        Heroku Integration
      • 15
        Good documentation
      • 14
        Free tier
      • 9
        Easy setup
      • 9
        Self-hosted
      • 7
        Realiable
      • 6
        Provides context, and great stack trace
      • 4
        Feedback form on error pages
      • 4
        Love it baby
      • 3
        Easy Integration
      • 3
        Gitlab integration
      • 3
        Filter by custom tags
      • 3
        Super user friendly
      • 3
        Captures local variables at each frame in backtraces
      • 1
        Performance measurements
      CONS OF SENTRY
      • 11
        Confusing UI
      • 2
        Bundle size

      related Sentry posts

      Johnny Bell

      For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

      I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

      I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

      After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

      I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

      See more
      TrackJS logo

      TrackJS

      3.3K
      194
      22
      JavaScript Error Monitoring for Modern Web Applications
      3.3K
      194
      + 1
      22
      PROS OF TRACKJS
      • 12
        Great error reporting
      • 2
        Great experience. Neat reporting
      • 2
        Awesome engineer support
      • 2
        Easy Setup
      • 2
        Telemetry Timeline
      • 1
        Realtime alerts
      • 1
        Slack Integration
      • 0
        Vivastreet
      CONS OF TRACKJS
        Be the first to leave a con

        related TrackJS posts

        Rollbar logo

        Rollbar

        1.5K
        1K
        529
        Proactively discover, predict, and remediate errors.
        1.5K
        1K
        + 1
        529
        PROS OF ROLLBAR
        • 73
          Consolidates similar errors by impact
        • 64
          Centralize error management
        • 63
          Slack integration
        • 58
          Github integration
        • 47
          Usage based pricing
        • 32
          Insane customer support
        • 23
          Instant search
        • 21
          Heroku integration
        • 18
          Consolidate errors by OS
        • 15
          Great Free Plan
        • 15
          Trello integration
        • 13
          Flexible logging (not just exceptions)
        • 11
          Simple yet powerful error tracking tool
        • 9
          Multiple Language Support
        • 7
          Consolidate errors by browser
        • 6
          Easy setup
        • 6
          Query errors with RQL
        • 5
          Deployment tracking is a nice free bonus
        • 5
          Best rails exception handler
        • 5
          Simple and fast integration
        • 5
          Awesome service
        • 4
          Easy setup, friendly ui, demo, lots of integrations
        • 3
          Errors Analysis
        • 3
          Clear and concise information.
        • 3
          Powerful
        • 3
          Beat your users to the error report
        • 3
          Server-side + client-side
        • 2
          Easy integration with sails.js
        • 2
          Bitbucket integration
        • 2
          Mailgun integration
        • 1
          Easy Set up familiar UI that doesn't make you look dumb
        • 1
          Clear errors on deploy or push
        • 1
          Gitlab integration
        CONS OF ROLLBAR
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Rollbar posts

          Robert Zuber

          Our primary source of monitoring and alerting is Datadog. We’ve got prebuilt dashboards for every scenario and integration with PagerDuty to manage routing any alerts. We’ve definitely scaled past the point where managing dashboards is easy, but we haven’t had time to invest in using features like Anomaly Detection. We’ve started using Honeycomb for some targeted debugging of complex production issues and we are liking what we’ve seen. We capture any unhandled exceptions with Rollbar and, if we realize one will keep happening, we quickly convert the metrics to point back to Datadog, to keep Rollbar as clean as possible.

          We use Segment to consolidate all of our trackers, the most important of which goes to Amplitude to analyze user patterns. However, if we need a more consolidated view, we push all of our data to our own data warehouse running PostgreSQL; this is available for analytics and dashboard creation through Looker.

          See more
          Bugsnag logo

          Bugsnag

          1K
          578
          267
          Bugsnag provides production error monitoring and management for front-end, mobile and back-end applications
          1K
          578
          + 1
          267
          PROS OF BUGSNAG
          • 45
            Lots of 3rd party integrations
          • 42
            Really reliable
          • 37
            Includes a free plan
          • 25
            No usage or rate limits
          • 23
            Design
          • 21
            Slack integration
          • 21
            Responsive support
          • 19
            Free tier
          • 11
            Unlimited
          • 6
            No Rate
          • 5
            Email notifications
          • 3
            Great customer support
          • 3
            React Native
          • 3
            Integrates well with Laravel
          • 3
            Reliable, great UI and insights, used for all our apps
          CONS OF BUGSNAG
          • 1
            Error grouping doesn't always work

          related Bugsnag posts

          Johnny Bell

          For my portfolio websites and my personal OpenSource projects I had started exclusively using React and JavaScript so I needed a way to track any errors that we're happening for my users that I didn't uncover during my personal UAT.

          I had narrowed it down to two tools LogRocket and Sentry (I also tried Bugsnag but it did not make the final two). Before I get into this I want to say that both of these tools are amazing and whichever you choose will suit your needs well.

          I firstly decided to go with LogRocket the fact that they had a recorded screen capture of what the user was doing when the bug happened was amazing... I could go back and rewatch what the user did to replicate that error, this was fantastic. It was also very easy to setup and get going. They had options for React and Redux.js so you can track all your Redux.js actions. I had a fairly large Redux.js store, this was ended up being a issue, it killed the processing power on my machine, Chrome ended up using 2-4gb of ram, so I quickly disabled the Redux.js option.

          After using LogRocket for a month or so I decided to switch to Sentry. I noticed that Sentry was openSorce and everyone was talking about Sentry so I thought I may as well give it a test drive. Setting it up was so easy, I had everything up and running within seconds. It also gives you the option to wrap an errorBoundry in React so get more specific errors. The simplicity of Sentry was a breath of fresh air, it allowed me find the bug that was shown to the user and fix that very simply. The UI for Sentry is beautiful and just really clean to look at, and their emails are also just perfect.

          I have decided to stick with Sentry for the long run, I tested pretty much all the JS error loggers and I find Sentry the best.

          See more
          James Smith
          Co-founder and CEO at James Smith · | 1 upvote · 210.7K views
          Shared insights
          on
          LeakCanaryLeakCanaryBugsnagBugsnag
          at

          There’s a tool called LeakCanary that was built by the team at Square. It detects memory allocations and can spot when this scenario is occurring. LeakCanary has been billed as a memory leak detection library for #Android (and you’ll be happy to know there’s a Bugsnag integration for it as well!).

          See more
          Airbrake logo

          Airbrake

          250
          282
          128
          Airbrake captures and groups errors in Ruby, iOS, Django, PHP & more.
          250
          282
          + 1
          128
          PROS OF AIRBRAKE
          • 28
            Reliable
          • 25
            Consolidates similar errors
          • 22
            Easy setup
          • 15
            Slack Integration
          • 10
            Github Integration
          • 7
            Email notifications
          • 6
            Includes a free plan
          • 5
            Android Application to view errors.
          • 4
            Search and filtering
          • 4
            Shows request parameters
          • 2
            Heroku integration
          CONS OF AIRBRAKE
          • 0
            Rejects error report if non-latin characters exists

          related Airbrake posts

          Spacemacs logo

          Spacemacs

          185
          193
          86
          Emacs advanced Kit focused on Evil: The best editor is neither Emacs nor Vim, it's Emacs *and* Vim!
          185
          193
          + 1
          86
          PROS OF SPACEMACS
          • 14
            Advanced support for Vim key bindings
          • 12
            Discoverability
          • 10
            Easy setup
          • 10
            Never have to touch the mouse
          • 7
            Community-driven configuration
          • 7
            Cross-platform
          • 6
            Documentation
          • 5
            Emacs
          • 4
            Fast-paced development
          • 4
            Evil
          • 4
            Nice UI
          • 2
            Git Integration
          • 1
            Autocompletion
          CONS OF SPACEMACS
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Spacemacs posts