NetData vs Zabbix

Overview

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

Netdata

Stacks226

Followers392

Votes82

NetData vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Scalability: NetData is known for its light-weight and highly scalable architecture, allowing it to efficiently monitor thousands of systems in real-time. On the other hand, Zabbix can also handle large-scale deployments, but it requires more resources and configuration complexity compared to NetData.
Ease of Installation: NetData is incredibly easy to install, requiring only a single command. It automatically detects and configures all available plugins and starts monitoring immediately without any additional setup. In contrast, Zabbix installation involves multiple steps, including database setup, configuration file modifications, and agent installation, which can be more time-consuming and complex.
Real-time Monitoring: NetData provides real-time monitoring with minimal delay, often displaying data with a one-second granularity. This makes it ideal for monitoring critical systems and applications that require instant visibility into performance metrics. Zabbix, on the other hand, offers near real-time monitoring with configurable update intervals, where data may take several seconds or minutes to become available.
User Interface: NetData offers a simple yet intuitive web-based user interface with interactive charts and graphs, providing an instant overview of monitored metrics. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use, enabling users to quickly identify and troubleshoot issues. Zabbix, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive user interface with a wide range of features, including dashboards, reports, and customizable views, making it suitable for more advanced monitoring requirements.
Agentless Architecture: NetData utilizes an agentless architecture, meaning it does not require any additional software to be installed on the monitored systems. This simplifies the deployment process and reduces resource consumption on the monitored systems. In contrast, Zabbix follows an agent-based architecture, where agents need to be installed on each system to collect data, making the setup process more complex and resource-intensive.
Alerting and Notification: NetData provides built-in alerting and notification capabilities, allowing users to define custom thresholds and receive instant alerts via various channels such as email, Slack, or PagerDuty. Zabbix also offers advanced alerting and notification features but requires additional configuration and setup to enable these functionalities.

In Summary, NetData stands out for its scalability, ease of installation, real-time monitoring, intuitive user interface, agentless architecture, and built-in alerting capabilities, while Zabbix offers a more comprehensive interface, customizable views, and advanced alerting features but with more complex installation and configuration processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zabbix, Netdata

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix	Netdata
Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.	Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation	Free, open-source; Easy installation and configuration; Access to monitoring unlimited metrics; Prebuilt dashboards and alarms; alerts on any metric, for a single host, an entire cluster, or your entire infrastructure; Tools for team collaboration; 800+ integrations
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 684	Stacks 226
Followers 981	Followers 392
Votes 66	Votes 82
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Templates 5 Service/node/network discovery 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish	Pros 17 Free 14 Easy setup 12 Graphs are interactive 9 Well maintained on github 9 Montiors datasbases
Integrations
Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com	Puppet Labs CouchDB ActiveMQ Logstash Fail2ban TimescaleDB Windows Grafana MongoDB RabbitMQ

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, Netdata?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Telegraf

It is an agent for collecting, processing, aggregating, and writing metrics. Design goals are to have a minimal memory footprint with a plugin system so that developers in the community can easily add support for collecting metrics.

Related Comparisons

NetData vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Scalability: NetData is known for its light-weight and highly scalable architecture, allowing it to efficiently monitor thousands of systems in real-time. On the other hand, Zabbix can also handle large-scale deployments, but it requires more resources and configuration complexity compared to NetData.
Ease of Installation: NetData is incredibly easy to install, requiring only a single command. It automatically detects and configures all available plugins and starts monitoring immediately without any additional setup. In contrast, Zabbix installation involves multiple steps, including database setup, configuration file modifications, and agent installation, which can be more time-consuming and complex.
Real-time Monitoring: NetData provides real-time monitoring with minimal delay, often displaying data with a one-second granularity. This makes it ideal for monitoring critical systems and applications that require instant visibility into performance metrics. Zabbix, on the other hand, offers near real-time monitoring with configurable update intervals, where data may take several seconds or minutes to become available.
User Interface: NetData offers a simple yet intuitive web-based user interface with interactive charts and graphs, providing an instant overview of monitored metrics. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use, enabling users to quickly identify and troubleshoot issues. Zabbix, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive user interface with a wide range of features, including dashboards, reports, and customizable views, making it suitable for more advanced monitoring requirements.
Agentless Architecture: NetData utilizes an agentless architecture, meaning it does not require any additional software to be installed on the monitored systems. This simplifies the deployment process and reduces resource consumption on the monitored systems. In contrast, Zabbix follows an agent-based architecture, where agents need to be installed on each system to collect data, making the setup process more complex and resource-intensive.
Alerting and Notification: NetData provides built-in alerting and notification capabilities, allowing users to define custom thresholds and receive instant alerts via various channels such as email, Slack, or PagerDuty. Zabbix also offers advanced alerting and notification features but requires additional configuration and setup to enable these functionalities.

NetData vs Zabbix

Overview