Alternatives to Plesk logo

Alternatives to Plesk

SpinupWP, cPanel, Webmin, fpm, and WordPress are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Plesk.
1.7K
4

What is Plesk and what are its top alternatives?

Plesk is a popular web hosting control panel that offers a user-friendly interface for managing websites, domains, email accounts, and more. Key features of Plesk include easy server and website management, automated updates and security patches, multi-server management, and support for various programming languages and applications. However, some limitations of Plesk include a steep learning curve for beginners, limited customization options, and a relatively high cost for some users.

  1. cPanel: cPanel is a widely-used web hosting control panel that offers an intuitive interface for managing websites, email accounts, databases, and more. Key features include one-click installations of popular apps, automatic backups, and robust security measures. Pros of cPanel compared to Plesk include a more familiar user interface for many users, extensive documentation and community support. However, cPanel may be more expensive than Plesk for some users.

  2. DirectAdmin: DirectAdmin is a lightweight yet powerful web hosting control panel that offers a simple and easy-to-use interface for managing websites, domains, and email accounts. Key features include support for multiple languages, custom branding options, and automatic updates. Pros of DirectAdmin compared to Plesk include a lower cost, faster performance on lower resource servers, and a more streamlined user interface. However, DirectAdmin may have fewer advanced features compared to Plesk.

  3. Vesta Control Panel: Vesta Control Panel is an open-source web hosting control panel that offers a sleek and modern interface for managing websites, email accounts, and databases. Key features include one-click installations, automatic updates, and support for multiple languages. Pros of Vesta Control Panel compared to Plesk include being free to use, lightweight system requirements, and regular updates from the open-source community. However, Vesta Control Panel may lack some advanced features available in Plesk.

  4. ISPConfig: ISPConfig is an open-source web hosting control panel that offers a robust and secure platform for managing websites, email accounts, and servers. Key features include support for multiple servers, LDAP authentication, and multi-language support. Pros of ISPConfig compared to Plesk include being free and open-source, regular updates from the community, and extensive documentation. However, ISPConfig may have a steeper learning curve for beginners compared to Plesk.

Top Alternatives to Plesk

  • SpinupWP
    SpinupWP

    It is a modern cloud server control panel designed to manage WordPress sites and serve them lightning-fast. ...

  • cPanel
    cPanel

    It is an industry leading hosting platform with world-class support. It is globally empowering hosting providers through fully-automated point-and-click hosting platform by hosting-centric professionals ...

  • Webmin
    Webmin

    It is a web-based interface for system administration for Unix. Using any modern web browser, you can setup user accounts, Apache, DNS, file sharing and much more. It removes the need to manually edit Unix configuration files. ...

  • fpm
    fpm

    It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats). ...

  • WordPress
    WordPress

    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family. ...

  • DirectAdmin
    DirectAdmin

    It is a graphical web-based web hosting control panel designed to make administration of websites easier. It is an extremely efficient control panel that uses the bare minimum of system resources. This makes it ideal for systems ranging from low-end VPS units to heavily-loaded dedicated servers ...

  • NGINX
    NGINX

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018. ...

  • Apache HTTP Server
    Apache HTTP Server

    The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet. ...

Plesk alternatives & related posts

SpinupWP logo

SpinupWP

1
1
0
A control panel designed to manage WordPress sites
1
1
+ 1
0
PROS OF SPINUPWP
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF SPINUPWP
      Be the first to leave a con

      related SpinupWP posts

      cPanel logo

      cPanel

      162
      125
      13
      Create an exceptional hosting experience
      162
      125
      + 1
      13
      PROS OF CPANEL
      • 3
        Backups
      • 3
        Documentation
      • 2
        Databases Management
      • 2
        DNS Zone Editor
      • 2
        Security
      • 1
        Extensions
      CONS OF CPANEL
      • 2
        Not free

      related cPanel posts

      I'm planning to make a web app with browser games that would be a Progressive Web App. I decided to use Vue.js as the front framework and Firebase to store basic information about users. Then I found out about Nuxt.js and I figured it could be really handy for making the project as PWA.

      The thing is, that I don't know if I will need Server Side Rendering for this, I couldn't find a lot of information but from what I know, the web app doesn't need SSR to be PWA. I am not sure how this would work with JavaScript browser games made with frameworks like Phaser or melon.js. Also, I host my website on GoDaddy and I've heard that it's quite hard to set up SSR with cPanel.

      So my questions are:

      Should I use SSR for Progressive Web Application built with Nuxt, filled with javascript browser games that are lazily loaded, or does that not make sense? If it makes sense, would SSR work with godaddy hosting and cPanel?

      Any help would be appreciated!

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      MySQLMySQLcPanelcPanelPleskPleskHostGatorHostGator

      Hello,

      I’ve been using a Reseller account to host my client's websites for many years ago.

      I noticed in the last few years low performance and weakness in technical support services, so I intended to move to another provider just like "HostGator," the problem is I'm using currently Plesk "Direct Admin" but the intended new reseller using "cPanel," the question is could I move my reseller without interrupting my clients? "No change from client-side will be performed ex (FTP accounts, control panel credentials, MySQL databases, users, DNS configuration, webmail boxes, and messages)."

      I would love your insights on where I should go. (Experienced)

      Note: I called the HostGator support, and they will make a migration manually; they also assure me that it wouldn't be any interruption, but I'm also not sure.

      See more
      Webmin logo

      Webmin

      72
      163
      13
      A web-based system configuration tool
      72
      163
      + 1
      13
      PROS OF WEBMIN
      • 3
        Review real-time resources (cpu, mem, stg, proc)
      • 2
        Easy to use
      • 2
        Virtualmin
      • 2
        Free
      • 1
        DNS Zone Editor
      • 1
        Modify ports and usage
      • 1
        Extensible and flexible
      • 1
        Modify applications
      CONS OF WEBMIN
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Webmin posts

        fpm logo

        fpm

        80
        93
        2
        packaging made simple
        80
        93
        + 1
        2
        PROS OF FPM
        • 2
          Easy to use
        CONS OF FPM
          Be the first to leave a con

          related fpm posts

          WordPress logo

          WordPress

          97.4K
          39.7K
          2.1K
          A semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.
          97.4K
          39.7K
          + 1
          2.1K
          PROS OF WORDPRESS
          • 416
            Customizable
          • 367
            Easy to manage
          • 354
            Plugins & themes
          • 258
            Non-tech colleagues can update website content
          • 247
            Really powerful
          • 145
            Rapid website development
          • 78
            Best documentation
          • 51
            Codex
          • 44
            Product feature set
          • 35
            Custom/internal social network
          • 18
            Open source
          • 8
            Great for all types of websites
          • 7
            Huge install and user base
          • 5
            I like it like I like a kick in the groin
          • 5
            It's simple and easy to use by any novice
          • 5
            Perfect example of user collaboration
          • 5
            Open Source Community
          • 5
            Most websites make use of it
          • 5
            Best
          • 4
            API-based CMS
          • 4
            Community
          • 3
            Easy To use
          • 2
            <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>
          CONS OF WORDPRESS
          • 13
            Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
          • 13
            Plugins are of mixed quality
          • 10
            Not best backend UI
          • 2
            Complex Organization
          • 1
            Do not cover all the basics in the core
          • 1
            Great Security

          related WordPress posts

          Dale Ross
          Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.6M views

          I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

          I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

          Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          ElementorElementorWordPressWordPress

          hello guys, I need your help. I created a website, I've been using Elementor forever, but yesterday I bought a template after I made the purchase I knew I made a mistake, cause the template was in HTML, can anyone please show me how to put this HTML template in my WordPress so it will be the face of my website, thank you in advance.

          See more
          DirectAdmin logo

          DirectAdmin

          18
          29
          0
          Powerful And Easy To Use Web Hosting Control Panel
          18
          29
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF DIRECTADMIN
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF DIRECTADMIN
              Be the first to leave a con

              related DirectAdmin posts

              NGINX logo

              NGINX

              113.3K
              60.9K
              5.5K
              A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.
              113.3K
              60.9K
              + 1
              5.5K
              PROS OF NGINX
              • 1.4K
                High-performance http server
              • 894
                Performance
              • 730
                Easy to configure
              • 607
                Open source
              • 530
                Load balancer
              • 289
                Free
              • 288
                Scalability
              • 226
                Web server
              • 175
                Simplicity
              • 136
                Easy setup
              • 30
                Content caching
              • 21
                Web Accelerator
              • 15
                Capability
              • 14
                Fast
              • 12
                High-latency
              • 12
                Predictability
              • 8
                Reverse Proxy
              • 7
                The best of them
              • 7
                Supports http/2
              • 5
                Great Community
              • 5
                Lots of Modules
              • 5
                Enterprise version
              • 4
                High perfomance proxy server
              • 3
                Embedded Lua scripting
              • 3
                Streaming media delivery
              • 3
                Streaming media
              • 3
                Reversy Proxy
              • 2
                Blash
              • 2
                GRPC-Web
              • 2
                Lightweight
              • 2
                Fast and easy to set up
              • 2
                Slim
              • 2
                saltstack
              • 1
                Virtual hosting
              • 1
                Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
              • 1
                Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
              • 1
                Ingress controller
              CONS OF NGINX
              • 10
                Advanced features require subscription

              related NGINX posts

              Simon Reymann
              Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 11.1M views

              Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

              • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
              • Respectively Git as revision control system
              • SourceTree as Git GUI
              • Visual Studio Code as IDE
              • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
              • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
              • SonarQube as quality gate
              • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
              • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
              • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
              • Heroku for deploying in test environments
              • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
              • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
              • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
              • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
              • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

              The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

              • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
              • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
              • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
              • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
              • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
              • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
              See more
              John-Daniel Trask
              Co-founder & CEO at Raygun · | 19 upvotes · 288.6K views

              We chose AWS because, at the time, it was really the only cloud provider to choose from.

              We tend to use their basic building blocks (EC2, ELB, Amazon S3, Amazon RDS) rather than vendor specific components like databases and queuing. We deliberately decided to do this to ensure we could provide multi-cloud support or potentially move to another cloud provider if the offering was better for our customers.

              We’ve utilized c3.large nodes for both the Node.js deployment and then for the .NET Core deployment. Both sit as backends behind an nginx instance and are managed using scaling groups in Amazon EC2 sitting behind a standard AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB).

              While we’re satisfied with AWS, we do review our decision each year and have looked at Azure and Google Cloud offerings.

              #CloudHosting #WebServers #CloudStorage #LoadBalancerReverseProxy

              See more
              Apache HTTP Server logo

              Apache HTTP Server

              64.4K
              22.5K
              1.4K
              Open-source HTTP server for modern operating systems including UNIX and Windows
              64.4K
              22.5K
              + 1
              1.4K
              PROS OF APACHE HTTP SERVER
              • 479
                Web server
              • 305
                Most widely-used web server
              • 217
                Virtual hosting
              • 148
                Fast
              • 138
                Ssl support
              • 44
                Since 1996
              • 28
                Asynchronous
              • 5
                Robust
              • 4
                Proven over many years
              • 2
                Mature
              • 2
                Perfomance
              • 1
                Perfect Support
              • 0
                Many available modules
              • 0
                Many available modules
              CONS OF APACHE HTTP SERVER
              • 4
                Hard to set up

              related Apache HTTP Server posts

              Nick Rockwell
              SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.1M views

              When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

              So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

              React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

              Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

              See more
              Tim Abbott
              Shared insights
              on
              NGINXNGINXApache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
              at

              We've been happy with nginx as part of our stack. As an open source web application that folks install on-premise, the configuration system for the webserver is pretty important to us. I have a few complaints (e.g. the configuration syntax for conditionals is a pain), but overall we've found it pretty easy to build a configurable set of options (see link) for how to run Zulip on nginx, both directly and with a remote reverse proxy in front of it, with a minimum of code duplication.

              Certainly I've been a lot happier with it than I was working with Apache HTTP Server in past projects.

              See more