StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Performance Monitoring
  4. Performance Monitoring
  5. Request Metrics vs ruxit

Request Metrics vs ruxit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ruxit
ruxit
Stacks240
Followers25
Votes5
Request Metrics
Request Metrics
Stacks6
Followers4
Votes0

Request Metrics vs ruxit: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the comparison between Request Metrics and ruxit, several key differences stand out that are worth considering when deciding between the two tools.

  1. Data collection methods: Request Metrics collects data by allowing users to embed a JavaScript snippet into their website, capturing performance metrics from real user interactions. On the other hand, ruxit uses an agent-based approach, installing an agent on the server to collect data and provide insights into performance and user experience.

  2. Focus on front-end vs. end-to-end monitoring: Request Metrics primarily focuses on front-end performance monitoring, providing insights into how a website performs from the user's perspective. In contrast, ruxit offers end-to-end monitoring by capturing data from the entire technology stack, including servers, databases, and applications, to give a comprehensive view of the system's performance.

  3. Ease of use: Request Metrics is known for its simplicity and ease of use, with a straightforward setup process and intuitive user interface. Ruxit, on the other hand, offers more advanced features and capabilities, which may require a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with the platform.

  4. Customization options: Request Metrics provides limited customization options, focusing on delivering essential performance metrics to users. Ruxit, on the other hand, offers extensive customization capabilities, allowing users to tailor the monitoring experience to meet their specific needs and requirements.

  5. Cost considerations: Request Metrics offers a more budget-friendly pricing model, making it an attractive option for users looking for a cost-effective performance monitoring solution. In contrast, ruxit tends to be more expensive, reflecting its broader range of features and capabilities.

  6. Support and resources: Request Metrics offers responsive customer support and a range of resources such as documentation and tutorials to help users make the most of the platform. Ruxit also provides robust support but may require additional technical expertise to fully leverage its capabilities.

In Summary, when comparing Request Metrics and ruxit, key differences include data collection methods, focus on monitoring, ease of use, customization options, cost considerations, and support resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ruxit
ruxit
Request Metrics
Request Metrics

Ruxit is a all-in-one performance monitoring solution for cloud natives. In under five minutes customizable dashboard views show you your application's performance data.

Website performance monitoring, simplified for small teams. It's not a expensive APM "solution" or a complex query language to learn. It is the key metrics you need to know to keep your website running fast and your customers happy.

AI-based analysis; Full code-level visibility, including database calls & web service stacks; Monitors server resources and availability; Service monitoring and deployment change detection; Locates bottlenecks & hotspots; Real-Time visualization of dependencies; Simple Installation with fully automatic discovery within minutes; Supports the most popular web technologies like Java, .NET, Node.js, MongoDB, PHP, Real User Monitoring with full user input tracing; Monitoring applications and microservices in Docker containers; Cloud detection and dynamic instance dependency monitoring for Amazon EC2 and Microsoft Azure; Geo-location-aware usage analysis and Apdex-based user-experience
Real-user monitoring;Performance monitoring;Web vitals;Pagespeed;Sitespeed;Website monitoring
Statistics
Stacks
240
Stacks
6
Followers
25
Followers
4
Votes
5
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Great customer support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
HipChat
HipChat
Docker
Docker
Slack
Slack
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Stack Overflow
Stack Overflow

What are some alternatives to ruxit, Request Metrics?

New Relic

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Datadog

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Pingdom

Pingdom

Pingdom is an uptime monitoring service. When problems happen with a site that Pingdom monitors, it immediately alerts the owner so the problem can be taken care of.

Better Stack

Better Stack

Better Stack is a radically better infrastructure monitoring platform that calls the right person on your team if anything goes wrong. Schedule on-call duties, receive helpful alerts, and collaborate on solving incidents faster than ever.

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

UptimeRobot

UptimeRobot

It is all about helping you to keep your websites up. It monitors your websites every 5 minutes and alerts you if your sites are down.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

StatusCake

StatusCake

Monitoring a website is one thing – finding the best way to alert you to downtime another. At StatusCake we give you as many options as possible to decide when & how often you’re contacted. Whether it’s by email, SMS, push notifications for iOS & Android or integration with third party apps including Zapier and PagerDuty – you decide how you want to be alerted and when!

Stackify

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana