StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. AWS Lambda vs Airflow

AWS Lambda vs Airflow

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Stacks26.0K
Followers18.8K
Votes432
Airflow
Airflow
Stacks1.7K
Followers2.8K
Votes128

AWS Lambda vs Airflow: What are the differences?

AWS Lambda and Airflow are both popular tools for managing and executing workflows in the cloud. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Deployment Model: AWS Lambda is a serverless computing service provided by Amazon Web Services. It allows you to upload your code and automatically run it in response to events. On the other hand, Apache Airflow is an open-source platform that allows you to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflows. It provides a more flexible and scalable deployment model compared to Lambda.

  2. Language Support: AWS Lambda supports a variety of programming languages such as Node.js, Python, Java, and C#. It provides built-in runtime environments for each supported language. In contrast, Apache Airflow is primarily written in Python and supports Python-based workflows. While it can execute code written in other languages, it requires additional configuration and dependencies.

  3. Event-Based vs Time-Based Triggers: AWS Lambda is designed to respond to events such as changes to data in an S3 bucket or a new message in an Amazon SQS queue. It allows you to set up event-based triggers to execute your code when specific events occur. On the other hand, Apache Airflow provides time-based triggers that allow you to schedule your workflows to run at specific times or intervals. It provides more control over when your workflows are executed.

  4. Execution Environment: AWS Lambda manages the execution environment for your code. It provisions the necessary computing resources and scales automatically based on the incoming workload. This allows you to focus on writing your code without worrying about infrastructure. In contrast, Apache Airflow requires you to set up and manage your own execution environment, whether it's on-premises or in the cloud. This gives you more control over the resources and configuration of your environment.

  5. Data Processing and Transformation: AWS Lambda is well-suited for small, event-driven tasks such as data processing and transformation. It allows you to write short-lived functions that can process a single event at a time. On the other hand, Apache Airflow is designed to handle complex, data-intensive workflows. It provides a rich set of operators and tools for data processing, transformation, and orchestration. It is more suitable for workflows that involve multiple steps and dependencies.

  6. Scalability and Cost: AWS Lambda automatically scales your functions based on incoming workload, allowing you to handle high traffic efficiently. You only pay for the compute time that your functions consume, which can be cost-effective for sporadic workloads. In contrast, Apache Airflow requires you to provision and manage the necessary computing resources, which can be more expensive and less scalable for large workloads.

In summary, AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service ideal for executing event-driven tasks at scale, while Airflow is a workflow management platform designed for orchestrating complex workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). Lambda excels at event-driven, serverless computing, while Airflow provides more flexibility and control for managing and orchestrating complex workflows.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS Lambda, Airflow

Tim
Tim

CTO at Checkly Inc.

Sep 18, 2019

Needs adviceonHerokuHerokuAWS LambdaAWS Lambda

When adding a new feature to Checkly rearchitecting some older piece, I tend to pick Heroku for rolling it out. But not always, because sometimes I pick AWS Lambda . The short story:

  • Developer Experience trumps everything.
  • AWS Lambda is cheap. Up to a limit though. This impact not only your wallet.
  • If you need geographic spread, AWS is lonely at the top.

The setup

Recently, I was doing a brainstorm at a startup here in Berlin on the future of their infrastructure. They were ready to move on from their initial, almost 100% Ec2 + Chef based setup. Everything was on the table. But we crossed out a lot quite quickly:

  • Pure, uncut, self hosted Kubernetes — way too much complexity
  • Managed Kubernetes in various flavors — still too much complexity
  • Zeit — Maybe, but no Docker support
  • Elastic Beanstalk — Maybe, bit old but does the job
  • Heroku
  • Lambda

It became clear a mix of PaaS and FaaS was the way to go. What a surprise! That is exactly what I use for Checkly! But when do you pick which model?

I chopped that question up into the following categories:

  • Developer Experience / DX 🤓
  • Ops Experience / OX 🐂 (?)
  • Cost 💵
  • Lock in 🔐

Read the full post linked below for all details

357k views357k
Comments
Mark
Mark

Nov 2, 2020

Needs adviceonMicrosoft AzureMicrosoft Azure

Need advice on what platform, systems and tools to use.

Evaluating whether to start a new digital business for which we will need to build a website that handles all traffic. Website only right now. May add smartphone apps later. No desktop app will ever be added. Website to serve various countries and languages. B2B and B2C type customers. Need to handle heavy traffic, be low cost, and scale well.

We are open to either build it on AWS or on Microsoft Azure.

Apologies if I'm leaving out some info. My first post. :) Thanks in advance!

133k views133k
Comments
John
John

Aug 13, 2020

Review

You could also use AWS Lambda and use Cloudwatch event schedule if you know when the function should be triggered. The benefit is that you could use any language and use the respective database client.

But if you orchestrate ETLs then it makes sense to use Apache Airflow. This requires Python knowledge.

248k views248k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Airflow
Airflow

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Extend other AWS services with custom logic;Build custom back-end services;Completely Automated Administration;Built-in Fault Tolerance;Automatic Scaling;Integrated Security Model;Bring Your Own Code;Pay Per Use;Flexible Resource Model
Dynamic: Airflow pipelines are configuration as code (Python), allowing for dynamic pipeline generation. This allows for writting code that instantiate pipelines dynamically.;Extensible: Easily define your own operators, executors and extend the library so that it fits the level of abstraction that suits your environment.;Elegant: Airflow pipelines are lean and explicit. Parameterizing your scripts is built in the core of Airflow using powerful Jinja templating engine.;Scalable: Airflow has a modular architecture and uses a message queue to talk to orchestrate an arbitrary number of workers. Airflow is ready to scale to infinity.
Statistics
Stacks
26.0K
Stacks
1.7K
Followers
18.8K
Followers
2.8K
Votes
432
Votes
128
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 129
    No infrastructure
  • 83
    Cheap
  • 70
    Quick
  • 59
    Stateless
  • 47
    No deploy, no server, great sleep
Cons
  • 7
    Cant execute ruby or go
  • 3
    Compute time limited
  • 1
    Can't execute PHP w/o significant effort
Pros
  • 53
    Features
  • 14
    Task Dependency Management
  • 12
    Beautiful UI
  • 12
    Cluster of workers
  • 10
    Extensibility
Cons
  • 2
    Observability is not great when the DAGs exceed 250
  • 2
    Open source - provides minimum or no support
  • 2
    Running it on kubernetes cluster relatively complex
  • 1
    Logical separation of DAGs is not straight forward

What are some alternatives to AWS Lambda, Airflow?

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Apache Beam

Apache Beam

It implements batch and streaming data processing jobs that run on any execution engine. It executes pipelines on multiple execution environments.

Zenaton

Zenaton

Developer framework to orchestrate multiple services and APIs into your software application using logic triggered by events and time. Build ETL processes, A/B testing, real-time alerts and personalized user experiences with custom logic.

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase