StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. CDN
  4. CDN
  5. Amazon CloudFront vs nginx

Amazon CloudFront vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Stacks21.4K
Followers10.8K
Votes935
NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K

Amazon CloudFront vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction Amazon CloudFront and nginx are both popular technologies used for content delivery. Although they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them that make them suitable for different use cases. This Markdown code will outline six specific differences between Amazon CloudFront and nginx.

  1. Scalability: Amazon CloudFront is a highly scalable content delivery network (CDN) service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It offers global reach and effectively handles high traffic volumes. On the other hand, nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, and cache server. While nginx can handle high traffic levels, it may not have the same level of scalability as CloudFront due to its more focused functionality.

  2. Content Caching: Both Amazon CloudFront and nginx have the capability to cache content to improve delivery speeds. However, CloudFront provides more advanced caching mechanisms, such as edge caching and object caching, which can be customized to suit specific requirements. Nginx also offers caching capabilities but may require additional configuration to achieve similar performance benefits.

  3. Integration with Cloud Services: As an AWS service, Amazon CloudFront seamlessly integrates with other AWS offerings like Amazon S3, Elastic Load Balancing, and Lambda@Edge. This integration enables easier setup and management of content delivery within the AWS ecosystem. Nginx, on the other hand, is a versatile web server that can be integrated with various cloud services but may require more manual configuration and setup.

  4. Geographic Distribution: Amazon CloudFront has an extensive global network of edge locations, allowing it to deliver content to users with low latency from multiple locations around the world. This geographic distribution ensures faster content delivery, minimizing network latency. While nginx can be deployed in a distributed manner, CloudFront's global network provides a larger footprint and wider reach.

  5. Pricing Structure: The pricing models for Amazon CloudFront and nginx differ significantly. CloudFront's pricing is based on variables like data transfer, requests, and data regional storage, offering various cost-effective options for different usage patterns. Nginx, being open-source software, is free to use and doesn't have direct costs associated with it. However, it may require additional infrastructure and maintenance resources, which can influence the overall cost.

  6. Management and Configuration: Amazon CloudFront provides a user-friendly management console within the AWS Management Console. It offers a simplified setup process, automated provisioning, and configuration using AWS services. Nginx, being a standalone software, requires manual configuration and management. Although nginx provides extensive configuration options, it may require more technical expertise to set up and maintain.

In Summary, Amazon CloudFront and nginx differ in terms of scalability, content caching capabilities, integration with cloud services, geographic distribution, pricing structure, and management/configuration ease. These differences determine their suitability for various use cases and should be considered when choosing a solution for content delivery.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon CloudFront, NGINX

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
NGINX
NGINX

Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Fast- Using a network of edge locations around the world, Amazon CloudFront caches copies of your static content close to viewers, lowering latency when they download your objects and giving you the high, sustained data transfer rates needed to deliver large popular objects to end users at scale.;Simple- A single API call lets you get started distributing content from your Amazon S3 bucket or Amazon EC2 instance or other origin server through the Amazon CloudFront network.;Designed for use with other Amazon Web Services Amazon CloudFront is designed for use with other Amazon Web Services, including Amazon S3, where you can durably store the definitive versions of your static files, and Amazon EC2, where you can run your application server for dynamically generated content.;Cost-Effective- Amazon CloudFront passes on the benefits of Amazon’s scale to you. You pay only for the content that you deliver through the network, without minimum commitments or up-front fees.;Elastic- With Amazon CloudFront, you don’t need to worry about maintaining expensive web-server capacity to meet the demand from potential traffic spikes for your content. The service automatically responds as demand increases or decreases without any intervention from you.;Reliable- Amazon CloudFront is built using Amazon’s highly reliable infrastructure. The distributed nature of edge locations used by Amazon CloudFront automatically routes end users to the closest available location as required by network conditions.;Global- Amazon CloudFront uses a global network of edge locations, located near your end users in the United States, Europe, Asia, and South America.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
Stacks
21.4K
Stacks
115.0K
Followers
10.8K
Followers
61.9K
Votes
935
Votes
5.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 245
    Fast
  • 166
    Cdn
  • 157
    Compatible with other aws services
  • 125
    Simple
  • 108
    Global
Cons
  • 3
    UI could use some work
  • 1
    Invalidations take so long
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription

What are some alternatives to Amazon CloudFront, NGINX?

CloudFlare

CloudFlare

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

KeyCDN

KeyCDN

KeyCDN offers super fast and secure content delivery for minimal loading time. In addition to the CDN, it also offers advanced image processing and many other features such as live logs and Let's Encrypt SSL.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Fastly

Fastly

Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds.

MaxCDN

MaxCDN

The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase