StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Amazon CodeGuru vs Code Inspector

Amazon CodeGuru vs Code Inspector

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Code Inspector
Code Inspector
Stacks5
Followers12
Votes0
Amazon CodeGuru
Amazon CodeGuru
Stacks68
Followers151
Votes24

Amazon CodeGuru vs Code Inspector: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Amazon CodeGuru and Code Inspector. CodeGuru and Code Inspector are both code analysis tools provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS).

  1. Integrations: CodeGuru provides deep integrations with developer tools like AWS CodeCommit and AWS CodePipeline, allowing for seamless integration into the existing development workflow. On the other hand, Code Inspector primarily integrates with AWS CodeBuild for code analysis during the build process.

  2. Code Recommendations: CodeGuru uses machine learning algorithms to generate intelligent code recommendations, suggesting optimizations and improvements in code quality, performance, and security. Code Inspector, however, does not provide code recommendations and is primarily focused on identifying code defects and vulnerabilities.

  3. Profiling and Performance Optimization: CodeGuru's key highlight is its ability to analyze application's runtime behavior and provide recommendations for optimizing performance. It uses data collected from profiling, including latency distributions and CPU utilization, to identify areas for improvement. Code Inspector, on the other hand, does not offer profiling capabilities and is mainly focused on static code analysis.

  4. Machine Learning-based Analysis: Amazon CodeGuru uses machine learning models trained on millions of code reviews from open-source projects to provide accurate and context-aware recommendations. Code Inspector, on the other hand, relies on a rule-based system to detect code defects and vulnerabilities.

  5. Cost Structure: CodeGuru has a usage-based pricing model, where customers pay for the number of lines of code analyzed, while Code Inspector is included as part of the AWS pricing for CodeBuild. This means that Code Inspector is available at no additional cost for CodeBuild users.

  6. Supported Languages: CodeGuru currently supports Java applications, both monolithic and microservices-based. Code Inspector provides broader language support, including Java, C#, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, TypeScript, and others.

In summary, CodeGuru offers deep integrations, code recommendations, profiling capabilities, and machine learning-based analysis, whereas Code Inspector primarily focuses on code defects and vulnerabilities, provides broader language support, and is included in the pricing of AWS CodeBuild.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Code Inspector
Code Inspector
Amazon CodeGuru
Amazon CodeGuru

It is a code analysis platform that automates code reviews on Github, Gitlab and Bitbucket by detecting duplicates, violations, and security vulnerabilities in more than 10 programming languages. Improve code quality and manage your technical debt.

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Code Analysis: Automatic detection of Security Vulnerabilities, Duplicates, Violations and Hotspots at every commit or pull request; Integrations: Seamless integration with GitHub, GitLab & BitBucket repositories (public/private); Analytics: Clear and actionable metrics to improve code quality and manage technical debt; APIs: Complete set of APIs to integrate with your CI/CD workflow (e.g. Jenkins, Travis, etc.); Multi-Langue support: C, C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, Shellscript, Scala, Python, PHP, and Ruby; Sharing: Share your statistics publicly or privately with your team to maximize code visibility across projects
Automate code reviews; Fast and reliable code issue detection; Trained on decades of knowledge and experience; Understand the runtime behavior of applications; Intelligent recommendations; Always-on profiling of applications in production
Statistics
Stacks
5
Stacks
68
Followers
12
Followers
151
Votes
0
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 24
    What programming languages are supported?
Cons
  • 1
    Works only on Java code
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
C++
C++
Scala
Scala
TypeScript
TypeScript
Golang
Golang
GitLab
GitLab
JavaScript
JavaScript
Java
Java
Ruby
Ruby
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Java
Java
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate

What are some alternatives to Code Inspector, Amazon CodeGuru?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana