StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Containers As A Service
  5. Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Azure Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Azure Container Service

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Stacks14.5K
Followers10.2K
Votes325
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Stacks97
Followers214
Votes11

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Azure Container Service: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides a comparison between Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) and Azure Container Service. Both services provide the ability to manage containers within scalable infrastructure, but there are key differences to consider when choosing between them.

  1. Container Orchestration: Amazon ECS uses its own proprietary container orchestration engine, while Azure Container Service offers multiple options for container orchestration, including Kubernetes, Mesos, and Docker Swarm. This gives Azure users the flexibility to choose the orchestration solution that best fits their needs.

  2. Integration with Cloud Platforms: Amazon ECS is tightly integrated with the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, providing seamless integration with other AWS services like CloudFormation, Elastic Load Balancing, and CloudWatch. Azure Container Service, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with the Microsoft Azure platform, allowing users to easily leverage other Azure services like Azure Active Directory and Azure Monitor.

  3. Managed vs. Self-Managed: Amazon ECS is a fully managed service, meaning AWS takes care of the underlying infrastructure, patching, and maintenance. Azure Container Service, however, requires users to provision and manage the virtual machines (VMs) that run the container orchestrator. This gives users more control over the virtual infrastructure but also requires more management effort.

  4. Networking: With Amazon ECS, networking is primarily managed through the use of Virtual Private Clouds (VPCs), allowing users to configure network resources like subnets, security groups, and network ACLs. Azure Container Service leverages Azure Virtual Networks (VNETs) for networking, providing similar capabilities through virtual networks, subnets, and network security groups.

  5. Scaling and Auto Scaling: Amazon ECS provides built-in support for scaling containers based on metrics like CPU and memory utilization. It also integrates with Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to automatically scale the underlying EC2 instances. Azure Container Service offers similar capabilities for scaling containers and VMs using Azure Virtual Machine Scale Sets, but it also integrates with Azure Monitor for more granular scaling based on custom metrics.

  6. Pricing and Cost: The pricing models for both services are different. Amazon ECS charges for the underlying EC2 instances used to run containers, as well as optional add-ons like Elastic Load Balancing and Amazon Elastic File System. Azure Container Service charges for the VMs used to run the container orchestrator, along with other Azure resources like storage and networking. Pricing plans may vary depending on the selected orchestrator in Azure Container Service.

In summary, the key differences between Amazon EC2 Container Service and Azure Container Service lie in container orchestration options, integration with cloud platforms, managed vs. self-managed approach, networking capabilities, scaling mechanisms, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon EC2 Container Service, Azure Container Service

Andres
Andres

Lead Senior Software Engineer at InTouch Technology

Jun 3, 2020

Decided

If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes.
EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.

91.7k views91.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

Docker Compatibility;Managed Clusters;Programmatic Control;Task Definitions;Scheduler;Docker Repository
Create a container hosting solution optimized for Azure;Scale and orchestrate applications using Apache Mesos or Docker Swarm;Use popular open source, client-side tooling;Migrate container workloads to and from Azure without code changes
Statistics
Stacks
14.5K
Stacks
97
Followers
10.2K
Followers
214
Votes
325
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 100
    Backed by amazon
  • 72
    Familiar to ec2
  • 53
    Cluster based
  • 42
    Simple API
  • 26
    Iam roles
Pros
  • 6
    Easy to setup, very agnostic
  • 3
    It supports Kubernetes, Mesos DC/OS and Docker Swarm
  • 2
    It has a nice command line interface (CLI) tool
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker
Docker
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos

What are some alternatives to Amazon EC2 Container Service, Azure Container Service?

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.

Amazon EKS

Amazon EKS

Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes clusters.

instainer

instainer

InstaDocker is a Docker container hosting service which allows run any Docker container on the cloud instantly.

Docker Datacenter

Docker Datacenter

Docker Datacenter is an integrated solution including open source and commercial software, the integrations between them, full Docker API support, validated configurations and commercial support for your Docker Datacenter environment.

DCHQ

DCHQ

DCHQ delivers enterprise discipline to Linux Containers application lifecycle management. Available in hosted and on-prem versions, DCHQ provides the most advanced application composition framework extending Docker Compose through environment variable bindings across images, BASH script plug-ins that can be invoked at request time and post-provision and support for clustering for high availability across multiple hosts and auto-scaling.

Supergiant

Supergiant

Supergiant is a container management platform built on top of Kubernetes. Supergiant makes it easy to deploy and manage faster, and it reduces hardware expenses. Packing algorithm efficiently matches your overall CPU and RAM needs.

AWS Fargate

AWS Fargate

AWS Fargate is a technology for Amazon ECS and EKS* that allows you to run containers without having to manage servers or clusters. With AWS Fargate, you no longer have to provision, configure, and scale clusters of virtual machines to run containers.

Azure Kubernetes Service

Azure Kubernetes Service

Deploy and manage containerized applications more easily with a fully managed Kubernetes service. It offers serverless Kubernetes, an integrated continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) experience, and enterprise-grade security and governance. Unite your development and operations teams on a single platform to rapidly build, deliver, and scale applications with confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana