StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Containers As A Service
  5. Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Portainer

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Portainer

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Stacks14.6K
Followers10.2K
Votes325
Portainer
Portainer
Stacks507
Followers842
Votes146

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown code, we will be discussing the key differences between Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) and Portainer. ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Portainer is an open-source container management platform.

  1. Scaling and Load Balancing: ECS offers built-in scaling and load balancing capabilities, where it can automatically scale the number of tasks or containers based on the demand and distribute the traffic evenly across the containers using the Elastic Load Balancer. On the other hand, Portainer does not provide native scaling and load balancing features and requires additional tools or configurations to achieve similar functionality.

  2. Platform Compatibility: ECS is tightly integrated with other AWS services, making it more suitable for running containerized applications within the AWS ecosystem. It provides seamless integration with services like CloudWatch, IAM, and CloudFormation, enabling easier management and monitoring of containerized workloads. In contrast, Portainer is agnostic to the underlying infrastructure and can run on any platform that supports Docker. It offers more flexibility for managing containers across different environments but lacks the deep integration with specific cloud providers.

  3. Multi-tenancy and User Access Control: ECS supports multi-tenancy and allows finer-grained control over user access through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies. It enables organizations to manage access to resources based on roles and permissions. Portainer, on the other hand, has limitations in terms of user access control and multi-tenancy. While it provides basic authentication and authorization mechanisms, it may not offer the same level of granular control over user permissions as ECS.

  4. Monitoring and Logging: ECS provides native integration with AWS CloudWatch, allowing users to collect, monitor, and analyze container metrics and logs. It simplifies the setup and configuration of logging and monitoring for containerized applications. In contrast, Portainer does not provide built-in monitoring and logging functionality. Users need to configure third-party monitoring tools or rely on native Docker logging capabilities to capture and analyze container logs.

  5. Managed Service vs. Open Source: ECS is a managed service offered by AWS, which means AWS takes care of the underlying infrastructure, scalability, and availability, allowing users to focus on deploying and managing containers. Portainer, being an open-source platform, requires users to set up and manage their own infrastructure and ensure scalability and availability. It offers more flexibility but also puts additional responsibilities on the users in terms of managing the environment.

  6. Pricing Model: ECS follows the AWS pricing model, where users pay for the resources and services they use, such as EC2 instances, EBS volumes, and load balancers. The pricing is based on the hourly or monthly usage of these resources. Portainer, being an open-source platform, is free to use and does not have any direct costs associated with it. However, users still need to consider the costs of the underlying infrastructure and any additional tools or services they use for managing containers.

In Summary, Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) offers built-in scaling and load balancing, tight integration with AWS services, better multi-tenancy and user access control, native monitoring and logging capabilities, managed service by AWS, and follows the AWS pricing model. On the other hand, Portainer is platform-agnostic, lacks native scaling and load balancing, has limitations in user access control and multi-tenancy, requires additional setup for monitoring and logging, is an open-source platform, and does not have direct costs associated with it.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon EC2 Container Service, Portainer

Andres
Andres

Lead Senior Software Engineer at InTouch Technology

Jun 3, 2020

Decided

If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes.
EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.

91.7k views91.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Portainer
Portainer

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Docker Compatibility;Managed Clusters;Programmatic Control;Task Definitions;Scheduler;Docker Repository
Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Statistics
Stacks
14.6K
Stacks
507
Followers
10.2K
Followers
842
Votes
325
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 100
    Backed by amazon
  • 72
    Familiar to ec2
  • 53
    Cluster based
  • 42
    Simple API
  • 26
    Iam roles
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Amazon EC2 Container Service, Portainer?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana