Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon RDS vs Redis: What are the differences?
Amazon RDS is a managed relational database service by AWS, while Redis is an open-source, in-memory data store. Let's explore the key differences between them.
Deployment and Management: Amazon RDS is a managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) for hosting and managing relational databases. It provisions and manages the infrastructure and handles tasks like backups, software updates, and patch management. Redis is an open-source in-memory data store that is typically deployed on-premises or on a cloud infrastructure. It requires manual deployment and management, including tasks like setting up servers, configuring replication, and handling backups.
Data Structure: Amazon RDS supports relational databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and SQL Server. It stores data in tables with a predefined schema. Redis is a key-value store that can store various types of data structures like strings, lists, sets, sorted sets, and hashes. It does not enforce any schema, allowing flexibility in data storage.
Performance and Scalability: Amazon RDS provides the capability to scale compute and storage resources vertically or horizontally. However, the scaling process may involve downtime in some cases. Redis is designed to be highly performant and scalable. It supports high-throughput workloads by keeping data in memory and using asynchronous replication for data persistence. It can scale horizontally by adding more Redis instances or using clustering.
Data Persistence: Amazon RDS offers various options for data persistence, including automated backups, database snapshots, and replication. The data can be stored on Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) volumes or Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service). Redis provides persistence options like RDB (Snapshotting) and AOF (Append-Only File). RDB takes point-in-time snapshots of the dataset, while AOF logs all the write operations. Both of these mechanisms can be used together for enhanced data durability.
Caching Functionality: Amazon RDS does not have built-in caching functionality. However, caching solutions like Amazon ElastiCache (which supports Redis) can be used in conjunction with RDS for caching requirements. Redis is often used as a caching layer due to its in-memory nature and support for data expiry. It provides advanced caching features like LRU (Least Recently Used) eviction, cache invalidation, and automatic data expiration.
Data Querying: Amazon RDS supports querying data using structured query languages like SQL. Complex queries involving joins, aggregations, and transactions are possible. Redis provides a set of simple commands to query and manipulate data based on its data structures. However, it does not support complex querying capabilities like joins or aggregations, as it is not designed as a replacement for traditional SQL-based databases.
In summary, Amazon RDS, a managed relational database service, offers automated backups, scaling, and high availability for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server, while Redis, an in-memory data store, excels in performance and versatility, particularly for caching and real-time analytics.
Pros of Amazon RDS
- Reliable failovers165
- Automated backups156
- Backed by amazon130
- Db snapshots92
- Multi-availability87
- Control iops, fast restore to point of time30
- Security28
- Elastic24
- Push-button scaling20
- Automatic software patching20
- Replication4
- Reliable3
- Isolation2
Pros of Redis
- Performance886
- Super fast542
- Ease of use513
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable164
- Free155
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Great community22
- Pub/Sub22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- NoSQL10
- Lists10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Bitmaps8
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Open Source7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Transactions4
- Outstanding performance4
- Runs server side LUA4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- Networked4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Scalable2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon RDS
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1