StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Amazon Redshift vs Amazon S3

Amazon Redshift vs Amazon S3

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Stacks55.1K
Followers40.2K
Votes2.0K
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
Stacks1.5K
Followers1.4K
Votes108

Amazon Redshift vs Amazon S3: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon Redshift and Amazon S3 are both popular products offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). However, they serve different purposes and have distinct features and capabilities. Understanding the key differences between Amazon Redshift and Amazon S3 is essential for determining which service is the best fit for a particular use case.

  1. Data Storage Structure: One of the significant differences between Amazon Redshift and Amazon S3 is how they store data. Amazon Redshift is a fully-managed data warehousing service that uses columnar storage, where data is organized and stored vertically by column. On the other hand, Amazon S3 is an object storage service that stores data in a flat structure, treating each object (file) as a separate entity. This difference in data storage structure has implications for data access and query performance.

  2. Data Querying and Processing: Another key difference is how data is queried and processed in Amazon Redshift and Amazon S3. Amazon Redshift supports SQL queries and is optimized for quickly analyzing and querying large datasets. It provides a massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and advanced query optimization features, making it suitable for complex analytical queries. In contrast, Amazon S3 does not offer built-in querying capabilities. To query data stored in Amazon S3, additional tools or services like Amazon Athena or AWS Glue are required.

  3. Data Scalability and Concurrency: The scalability and concurrency capabilities differ between Amazon Redshift and Amazon S3. Amazon Redshift is designed to handle high-performance analytics workloads with the ability to scale vertically (by adding more compute resources) and horizontally (by adding more clusters). It also supports concurrent queries, allowing multiple users to run queries simultaneously without performance degradation. On the other hand, Amazon S3 is highly scalable and can store virtually unlimited amounts of data. However, it does not provide built-in concurrency and has limitations in terms of directly querying and processing data.

  4. Data Ingestion and Updates: When it comes to data ingestion and updates, Amazon Redshift and Amazon S3 have distinct capabilities. Amazon Redshift is optimized for bulk data loading and updates, making it suitable for scenarios where data is regularly added or modified. It provides different mechanisms like COPY command and data manipulation language (DML) statements to efficiently load and update data. Amazon S3, on the other hand, is designed for storing and retrieving unstructured or semi-structured data, and it does not support direct updates like traditional databases.

  5. Data Durability and Resilience: Amazon Redshift and Amazon S3 have different durability and resilience features. Amazon S3 is designed for 99.999999999% (11 nines) object durability, meaning that objects stored in S3 are highly reliable and protected against data loss. It automatically replicates data across multiple devices and facilities. Amazon Redshift also provides data durability through automatic replication, but it uses a different replication mechanism optimized for data warehousing workloads.

  6. Data Pricing Model: The pricing models for Amazon Redshift and Amazon S3 vary. Amazon Redshift pricing is based on factors like the type and size of nodes, the amount of data stored, and the data transfer rates. It offers different pricing options such as on-demand, reserved instances, and per-second billing. On the other hand, Amazon S3 pricing is based on factors like the amount of data stored, data transfer rates, and additional features like data retrieval options. It also provides pricing tiers based on the storage class used (Standard, Intelligent-Tiering, Glacier, etc.)

In summary, Amazon Redshift is a columnar data warehousing service optimized for analytical queries, with superior query performance and scalability, while Amazon S3 is an object storage service suitable for storing and retrieving large volumes of unstructured or semi-structured data, but requires additional tools for querying and processing. Pricing, data storage structure, querying capabilities, data updates, scalability, and durability are the key differences between Amazon Redshift and Amazon S3.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift

datocrats-org
datocrats-org

Jul 29, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon EC2Amazon EC2TableauTableauPowerBIPowerBI

We need to perform ETL from several databases into a data warehouse or data lake. We want to

  • keep raw and transformed data available to users to draft their own queries efficiently
  • give users the ability to give custom permissions and SSO
  • move between open-source on-premises development and cloud-based production environments

We want to use inexpensive Amazon EC2 instances only on medium-sized data set 16GB to 32GB feeding into Tableau Server or PowerBI for reporting and data analysis purposes.

319k views319k
Comments
Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.
Optimized for Data Warehousing- It uses columnar storage, data compression, and zone maps to reduce the amount of IO needed to perform queries. Redshift has a massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture, parallelizing and distributing SQL operations to take advantage of all available resources.;Scalable- With a few clicks of the AWS Management Console or a simple API call, you can easily scale the number of nodes in your data warehouse up or down as your performance or capacity needs change.;No Up-Front Costs- You pay only for the resources you provision. You can choose On-Demand pricing with no up-front costs or long-term commitments, or obtain significantly discounted rates with Reserved Instance pricing.;Fault Tolerant- Amazon Redshift has multiple features that enhance the reliability of your data warehouse cluster. All data written to a node in your cluster is automatically replicated to other nodes within the cluster and all data is continuously backed up to Amazon S3.;SQL - Amazon Redshift is a SQL data warehouse and uses industry standard ODBC and JDBC connections and Postgres drivers.;Isolation - Amazon Redshift enables you to configure firewall rules to control network access to your data warehouse cluster.;Encryption – With just a couple of parameter settings, you can set up Amazon Redshift to use SSL to secure data in transit and hardware-acccelerated AES-256 encryption for data at rest.<br>
Statistics
Stacks
55.1K
Stacks
1.5K
Followers
40.2K
Followers
1.4K
Votes
2.0K
Votes
108
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 590
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
Cons
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 3
    Complex to set up
Pros
  • 41
    Data Warehousing
  • 27
    Scalable
  • 17
    SQL
  • 14
    Backed by Amazon
  • 5
    Encryption
Integrations
No integrations available
SQLite
SQLite
MySQL
MySQL
Oracle PL/SQL
Oracle PL/SQL

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift?

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Altiscale

Altiscale

we run Apache Hadoop for you. We not only deploy Hadoop, we monitor, manage, fix, and update it for you. Then we take it a step further: We monitor your jobs, notify you when something’s wrong with them, and can help with tuning.

Snowflake

Snowflake

Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase