Amazon S3 vs Rackspace Cloud Files

Overview

Amazon S3

Stacks55.1K

Followers40.2K

Votes2.0K

Rackspace Cloud Files

Stacks63

Followers67

Votes25

Amazon S3 vs Rackspace Cloud Files: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon S3 and Rackspace Cloud Files

Amazon S3 and Rackspace Cloud Files are both cloud storage solutions, but they have some key differences. Here are six specific differences between the two:

Storage Architecture: Amazon S3 uses an object-based storage architecture, where each object is stored in a separate file with a unique key. In contrast, Rackspace Cloud Files uses a container-based architecture, where objects are organized into containers or directories.
Scalability: Amazon S3 has a highly scalable architecture that can handle virtually unlimited amounts of data. It offers automatic scaling and load balancing, ensuring high availability and performance. Rackspace Cloud Files, although scalable, may have limitations on storage size and performance for larger deployments.
Data Transfer Costs: Amazon S3 charges separately for data transfer in and out of the storage service, as well as for data transfer within different regions. Rackspace Cloud Files, on the other hand, includes data transfer within the same region at no additional cost, which can be advantageous for certain workloads.
Pricing: Both Amazon S3 and Rackspace Cloud Files offer different pricing models based on storage usage, data transfer, and additional services. However, the specific pricing structures and rates may vary significantly between the two providers. It's important to compare and evaluate costs based on individual requirements.
CDN Integration: Amazon S3 seamlessly integrates with Amazon CloudFront, its content delivery network (CDN) service, allowing for efficient global content distribution. Rackspace Cloud Files also offers CDN integration, but it may require additional configuration and setup compared to the built-in integration of Amazon S3 and CloudFront.
Additional Services: Amazon S3 provides a wide range of additional services and features, such as data encryption, versioning, and lifecycle management. Rackspace Cloud Files, while offering basic storage functionality, may have fewer additional services and features available, depending on the specific requirements of the user.

In Summary, Amazon S3 and Rackspace Cloud Files differ in their storage architecture, scalability, data transfer costs, pricing models, CDN integration, and additional services offered.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, Rackspace Cloud Files

Mohammad

Aug 30, 2020

Needs adviceon

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

PHP

Laravel

Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.

My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.

I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:

Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?
DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure
Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.
There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.

Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.

180k views180k

Comments

Dalton

Oct 23, 2020

Decided

Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.

143k views143k

Comments

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3	Rackspace Cloud Files
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web	Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).
Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.	Pay as you grow pricing starting at 10¢/GB/Mo.;Akamai CDN delivery of your content starting at 12¢/GB;Use as much or as little storage as you want;Store files and media of any size;Highly scalable, redundant online storage;Cloud Files is built with OpenStack technology;No long-term contracts;RESTful API enables developer access;Cloud Files is Powered by OpenStack;Cloud Files with Akamai CDN;Mix 'n Match Compute Platforms with RackConnect
Statistics
Stacks 55.1K	Stacks 63
Followers 40.2K	Followers 67
Votes 2.0K	Votes 25
Pros & Cons
Pros 590 Reliable 492 Scalable 456 Cheap 329 Simple & easy 83 Many sdks Cons 7 Permissions take some time to get right 6 Requires a credit card 6 Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly 3 Complex to set up	Pros 5 Inexpensive and pay-as-you-go 5 Akamai CDN 4 Simple file upload 3 Simple scaling 2 Any media type, any size

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, Rackspace Cloud Files?

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Amazon S3 vs Rackspace Cloud Files: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon S3 and Rackspace Cloud Files

Amazon S3 and Rackspace Cloud Files are both cloud storage solutions, but they have some key differences. Here are six specific differences between the two:

Storage Architecture: Amazon S3 uses an object-based storage architecture, where each object is stored in a separate file with a unique key. In contrast, Rackspace Cloud Files uses a container-based architecture, where objects are organized into containers or directories.
Scalability: Amazon S3 has a highly scalable architecture that can handle virtually unlimited amounts of data. It offers automatic scaling and load balancing, ensuring high availability and performance. Rackspace Cloud Files, although scalable, may have limitations on storage size and performance for larger deployments.
Data Transfer Costs: Amazon S3 charges separately for data transfer in and out of the storage service, as well as for data transfer within different regions. Rackspace Cloud Files, on the other hand, includes data transfer within the same region at no additional cost, which can be advantageous for certain workloads.
Pricing: Both Amazon S3 and Rackspace Cloud Files offer different pricing models based on storage usage, data transfer, and additional services. However, the specific pricing structures and rates may vary significantly between the two providers. It's important to compare and evaluate costs based on individual requirements.
CDN Integration: Amazon S3 seamlessly integrates with Amazon CloudFront, its content delivery network (CDN) service, allowing for efficient global content distribution. Rackspace Cloud Files also offers CDN integration, but it may require additional configuration and setup compared to the built-in integration of Amazon S3 and CloudFront.
Additional Services: Amazon S3 provides a wide range of additional services and features, such as data encryption, versioning, and lifecycle management. Rackspace Cloud Files, while offering basic storage functionality, may have fewer additional services and features available, depending on the specific requirements of the user.

In Summary, Amazon S3 and Rackspace Cloud Files differ in their storage architecture, scalability, data transfer costs, pricing models, CDN integration, and additional services offered.