Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon Redshift vs Xplenty: What are the differences?
## Introduction
When choosing a data warehousing solution, it's important to understand the key differences between Amazon Redshift and Xplenty to make an informed decision.
1. **Cost Structure**: Amazon Redshift offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the compute nodes and the amount of data stored, while Xplenty charges based on the number of data integration tasks and the volume of data processed. This difference can have a significant impact on the overall cost of using these platforms based on the specific needs and usage patterns of the organization.
2. **Scalability**: Amazon Redshift allows users to easily scale their cluster by adding more nodes to handle increasing workloads, while Xplenty provides horizontal scalability by enabling users to distribute data processing tasks across multiple nodes. The scalability approach of these two platforms can influence the performance and flexibility of handling large volumes of data.
3. **Ease of Use**: Amazon Redshift is tightly integrated with the AWS ecosystem, making it easier for users already using AWS services to set up and manage their data warehouse. On the other hand, Xplenty provides a more user-friendly and intuitive interface for building data pipelines and transformations without the need for extensive coding skills. The ease of use can impact the time and resources required for implementing and maintaining the data infrastructure.
4. **Supported Data Sources**: Amazon Redshift supports a wide range of data sources and can seamlessly integrate with other AWS services, providing a comprehensive data warehousing solution for organizations heavily invested in the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Xplenty offers connectivity to various data sources, including databases, cloud storage, and SaaS applications, enabling users to consolidate data from diverse sources for analysis and reporting.
5. **Data Transformation Capabilities**: Amazon Redshift primarily focuses on data storage and analytics, requiring additional tools or services for complex data transformations and ETL processes. Xplenty, on the other hand, provides robust data transformation capabilities, including built-in data cleaning, enrichment, and aggregation functions, making it a more versatile platform for data processing and preparation tasks.
6. **Security and Compliance Features**: Amazon Redshift offers encryption at rest and in transit, fine-grained access control, and integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for securing data and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Xplenty also provides advanced security features, such as role-based access controls, audit logging, and data masking, to protect sensitive information and maintain data integrity.
In Summary, understanding the key differences between Amazon Redshift and Xplenty in terms of cost structure, scalability, ease of use, supported data sources, data transformation capabilities, and security features is crucial for selecting the most suitable data warehousing solution for your organization.
We need to perform ETL from several databases into a data warehouse or data lake. We want to
- keep raw and transformed data available to users to draft their own queries efficiently
- give users the ability to give custom permissions and SSO
- move between open-source on-premises development and cloud-based production environments
We want to use inexpensive Amazon EC2 instances only on medium-sized data set 16GB to 32GB feeding into Tableau Server or PowerBI for reporting and data analysis purposes.
You could also use AWS Lambda and use Cloudwatch event schedule if you know when the function should be triggered. The benefit is that you could use any language and use the respective database client.
But if you orchestrate ETLs then it makes sense to use Apache Airflow. This requires Python knowledge.
Though we have always built something custom, Apache airflow (https://airflow.apache.org/) stood out as a key contender/alternative when it comes to open sources. On the commercial offering, Amazon Redshift combined with Amazon Kinesis (for complex manipulations) is great for BI, though Redshift as such is expensive.
You may want to look into a Data Virtualization product called Conduit. It connects to disparate data sources in AWS, on prem, Azure, GCP, and exposes them as a single unified Spark SQL view to PowerBI (direct query) or Tableau. Allows auto query and caching policies to enhance query speeds and experience. Has a GPU query engine and optimized Spark for fallback. Can be deployed on your AWS VM or on prem, scales up and out. Sounds like the ideal solution to your needs.
Cloud Data-warehouse is the centerpiece of modern Data platform. The choice of the most suitable solution is therefore fundamental.
Our benchmark was conducted over BigQuery and Snowflake. These solutions seem to match our goals but they have very different approaches.
BigQuery is notably the only 100% serverless cloud data-warehouse, which requires absolutely NO maintenance: no re-clustering, no compression, no index optimization, no storage management, no performance management. Snowflake requires to set up (paid) reclustering processes, to manage the performance allocated to each profile, etc. We can also mention Redshift, which we have eliminated because this technology requires even more ops operation.
BigQuery can therefore be set up with almost zero cost of human resources. Its on-demand pricing is particularly adapted to small workloads. 0 cost when the solution is not used, only pay for the query you're running. But quickly the use of slots (with monthly or per-minute commitment) will drastically reduce the cost of use. We've reduced by 10 the cost of our nightly batches by using flex slots.
Finally, a major advantage of BigQuery is its almost perfect integration with Google Cloud Platform services: Cloud functions, Dataflow, Data Studio, etc.
BigQuery is still evolving very quickly. The next milestone, BigQuery Omni, will allow to run queries over data stored in an external Cloud platform (Amazon S3 for example). It will be a major breakthrough in the history of cloud data-warehouses. Omni will compensate a weakness of BigQuery: transferring data in near real time from S3 to BQ is not easy today. It was even simpler to implement via Snowflake's Snowpipe solution.
We also plan to use the Machine Learning features built into BigQuery to accelerate our deployment of Data-Science-based projects. An opportunity only offered by the BigQuery solution
Pros of Amazon Redshift
- Data Warehousing41
- Scalable27
- SQL17
- Backed by Amazon14
- Encryption5
- Cheap and reliable1
- Isolation1
- Best Cloud DW Performance1
- Fast columnar storage1
Pros of Xplenty
- Simple, easy to integrate/process data without coding2