Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon S3

53.6K
40K
+ 1
2K
RocksDB

140
290
+ 1
11
Add tool

Amazon S3 vs RocksDB: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon S3 and RocksDB

Amazon S3 and RocksDB are both important tools in the world of data storage and management. However, they have some key differences that set them apart.

1. Scalability: - Amazon S3: Amazon S3 is designed to handle massive scalability. It can store and retrieve any amount of data from anywhere on the web. It is built to accommodate growing data volumes and can handle a tremendous number of requests per second. - RocksDB: While RocksDB is also scalable, it is better suited for smaller-scale applications. It is optimized for fast storage and retrieval on local disks or flash-based storage systems.

2. Data Durability: - Amazon S3: Amazon S3 provides high durability for data. It automatically replicates data across multiple devices and facilities within a region, ensuring that data is highly available and durable. - RocksDB: RocksDB, on the other hand, does not provide built-in data replication or durability features. It relies on the underlying storage system for durability.

3. Data Model: - Amazon S3: Amazon S3 is an object storage service, where each object is identified by a unique key within a bucket. It does not support complex data structures or indexing. - RocksDB: RocksDB is an embedded key-value store that supports a wide range of data models. It allows developers to create and manage complex data structures, supports atomic updates, and provides various types of indexes.

4. Performance: - Amazon S3: While Amazon S3 is highly scalable, its performance can be affected by factors such as network latency, request size, and the number of requests per second. It is optimized for high throughput rather than low latency. - RocksDB: RocksDB is designed for low-latency storage and retrieval. It is optimized for fast random reads and writes, making it well-suited for applications that require high-performance data access.

5. Cost: - Amazon S3: Amazon S3 pricing is based on the amount of data stored, the number of requests made, and the data transfer out of the service. It can be relatively expensive for storing large amounts of data. - RocksDB: RocksDB is an open-source project and can be used without any additional cost. However, the cost of underlying hardware and storage devices needs to be considered.

6. Use Cases: - Amazon S3: Amazon S3 is commonly used for storing and distributing static web content, backup and restore, data archiving, big data analytics, and as a content delivery network (CDN) cache. - RocksDB: RocksDB is often used as an embedded database within applications, providing fast and efficient storage for data caching, session management, and data indexing.

In Summary, Amazon S3 is a highly scalable object storage service, optimized for durability and availability, while RocksDB is an embedded key-value store, optimized for low-latency storage and retrieval, and flexibility in data modeling.

Advice on Amazon S3 and RocksDB

Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.

My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.

I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:

  • Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?

  • DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure

  • Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.

  • Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.

  • There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.

Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.

See more
Replies (2)
Michira Griffins
Software Developer at Codeshares Ltd · | 1 upvotes · 125.6K views

If pricing is the issue i'd suggest you use digital ocean, but if its not use amazon was digital oceans API is s3 compatible

See more
Recommends
on
Cloudways Cloudways

Hello Mohammad, I am using : Cloudways >> AWS >> Bahrain for last 2 years. This is best I consider out of my 10 year research on Laravel hosting.

See more
Decisions about Amazon S3 and RocksDB

Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.

See more
Gabriel Pa

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Amazon S3
Pros of RocksDB
  • 590
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
  • 30
    Logical
  • 13
    Easy Setup
  • 11
    REST API
  • 11
    1000+ POPs
  • 6
    Secure
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Plug and play
  • 3
    Web UI for uploading files
  • 2
    Faster on response
  • 2
    Flexible
  • 2
    GDPR ready
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Plug-gable
  • 1
    Easy integration with CloudFront
  • 5
    Very fast
  • 3
    Made by Facebook
  • 2
    Consistent performance
  • 1
    Ability to add logic to the database layer where needed

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon S3
Cons of RocksDB
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 3
    Complex to set up
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    6.8K
    50.7K
    326
    36
    491
    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Amazon S3?

    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

    What is RocksDB?

    RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage. RocksDB can also be the foundation for a client-server database but our current focus is on embedded workloads. RocksDB builds on LevelDB to be scalable to run on servers with many CPU cores, to efficiently use fast storage, to support IO-bound, in-memory and write-once workloads, and to be flexible to allow for innovation.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Amazon S3?
    What companies use RocksDB?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon S3?
    What tools integrate with RocksDB?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Amazon S3 and RocksDB?
    Amazon Glacier
    In order to keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for data that is infrequently accessed and for which retrieval times of several hours are suitable. With Amazon Glacier, customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.01 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions.
    Amazon EBS
    Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.
    Amazon EC2
    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
    Google Drive
    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.
    Microsoft Azure
    Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.
    See all alternatives