Apache Allura vs Bitbucket

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Apache Allura

Stacks2

Followers26

Votes0

Apache Allura vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Apache Allura and Bitbucket, highlighting key differences between the two.

Collaboration Features: Apache Allura offers robust collaboration features, including integrated code review, issue tracking, and wiki functionality. Bitbucket, on the other hand, focuses more on code collaboration, providing features like pull requests and inline code comments.
Scalability and Customization: While both Apache Allura and Bitbucket can be self-hosted, Apache Allura offers more scalability and customization options. It supports multiple databases and allows for plugins development, making it suitable for large-scale projects. Bitbucket, however, is more streamlined and provides a simpler interface for small to medium-sized teams.
Integration and Ecosystem: Bitbucket has a stronger integration ecosystem and offers seamless integration with other popular Atlassian tools like Jira and Confluence. Apache Allura, on the other hand, provides integrations with various third-party tools, but the options are more limited compared to Bitbucket.
Pricing and Hosting: Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with different features and limitations. It also provides cloud hosting for ease of use. Apache Allura, being an open-source platform, is free to use but requires self-hosting, which can involve additional setup and maintenance efforts.
Version Control System (VCS) Support: Bitbucket primarily supports Git as its default VCS, allowing for distributed version control. On the other hand, Apache Allura provides support for both Git and Subversion (SVN), offering flexibility for projects using different VCS tools.
Community and Support: Bitbucket has a larger user community and provides comprehensive documentation and support resources. Apache Allura, although it has an active community, has comparatively lesser documentation and support available.

In summary, Apache Allura and Bitbucket differ in their collaboration features, scalability and customization options, integration ecosystem, pricing and hosting, VCS support, and community and support resources. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific needs and requirements of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Apache Allura

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Apache Allura
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Apache Allura is an open source implementation of a software forge, a web site that manages source code repositories, bug reports, discussions, wiki pages, blogs, and more for any number of individual projects.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Issue Tracking;Threaded Discussion Forums;Code Repository;Documentation;Open Source
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 2
Followers 33.4K	Followers 26
Votes 2.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Git Mercurial SVN (Subversion)

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Apache Allura?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

Apache Allura vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Apache Allura and Bitbucket, highlighting key differences between the two.

Collaboration Features: Apache Allura offers robust collaboration features, including integrated code review, issue tracking, and wiki functionality. Bitbucket, on the other hand, focuses more on code collaboration, providing features like pull requests and inline code comments.
Scalability and Customization: While both Apache Allura and Bitbucket can be self-hosted, Apache Allura offers more scalability and customization options. It supports multiple databases and allows for plugins development, making it suitable for large-scale projects. Bitbucket, however, is more streamlined and provides a simpler interface for small to medium-sized teams.
Integration and Ecosystem: Bitbucket has a stronger integration ecosystem and offers seamless integration with other popular Atlassian tools like Jira and Confluence. Apache Allura, on the other hand, provides integrations with various third-party tools, but the options are more limited compared to Bitbucket.
Pricing and Hosting: Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with different features and limitations. It also provides cloud hosting for ease of use. Apache Allura, being an open-source platform, is free to use but requires self-hosting, which can involve additional setup and maintenance efforts.
Version Control System (VCS) Support: Bitbucket primarily supports Git as its default VCS, allowing for distributed version control. On the other hand, Apache Allura provides support for both Git and Subversion (SVN), offering flexibility for projects using different VCS tools.
Community and Support: Bitbucket has a larger user community and provides comprehensive documentation and support resources. Apache Allura, although it has an active community, has comparatively lesser documentation and support available.

Apache Allura vs Bitbucket

Overview

Apache Allura vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?