Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Allura vs RhodeCode: What are the differences?
Apache Allura: GitHub OSS Alternative. Apache Allura is an open source implementation of a software forge, a web site that manages source code repositories, bug reports, discussions, wiki pages, blogs, and more for any number of individual projects; RhodeCode: Enterprise source code management platform for behind-the-firewall Mercurial, Git & Subversion. Secure and Open Source. RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night.
Apache Allura and RhodeCode can be categorized as "Code Collaboration & Version Control" tools.
Some of the features offered by Apache Allura are:
- Issue Tracking
- Threaded Discussion Forums
- Code Repository
On the other hand, RhodeCode provides the following key features:
- unified repository management across Mercurial, Git & SVN
- full-text source code search
- web-based code editor
Pros of Apache Allura
Pros of RhodeCode
- Self hosted22
- Great performance20
- Multiple version control systems19
- Integrations with CI / issue trackers19
- Full text search18
- Open Source18
- Best in class permission18
- Secure authentication17
- Permission system15
- One line online/offiline upgrades11
- Easy installation7
- Supports multiple version control systems6
- Advanced code reviews6
- Free, unlimited users6
- free up to 25users3
- Runs under Windows, too3
- SVN support1
- Features and great support1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache Allura
Cons of RhodeCode
- No easy installation for Windows0