StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Apache Camel vs Rafay Systems

Apache Camel vs Rafay Systems

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Camel
Apache Camel
Stacks8.2K
Followers323
Votes22
GitHub Stars6.0K
Forks5.1K
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems
Stacks9
Followers21
Votes0

Apache Camel vs Rafay Systems: What are the differences?

Developers describe Apache Camel as "A versatile open source integration framework". An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers. On the other hand, Rafay Systems is detailed as "Lifecycle Management for Containerized Applications". It delivers a turnkey SaaS platform that automates the ongoing operations and lifecycle management for containerized applications. DevOps and SRE teams can leverage it to significantly reduce the Kubernetes-related complexity when deploying and operating apps across clusters. For both enterprises and service providers, this platform delivers unique dynamic application placement and distribution capabilities, making it the ideal for multi-region, multi-cloud, hybrid, and edge/MEC operations.

Apache Camel can be classified as a tool in the "Integration Tools" category, while Rafay Systems is grouped under "Platform as a Service".

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Camel
Apache Camel
Rafay Systems
Rafay Systems

An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.

Rafay's automation framework provides multi-cluster management and app operations at scale. Create, deploy, operate, monitor, upgrade and retire Kubernetes clusters & k8s-resident applications across multi-regions, clouds and environments.

-
CI/CD integration; Multi-Cloud abstractions; Customizable, In-cluster scaling; Cross-cluster deployment & scaling; Global traffic steering and API management; Dynamic workload placement; App log & metric aggregation; Operational debugging and diagnostics; Data & State synchronization; Config synchronization; Canary / Rolling upgrades; App health tracking
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.2K
Stacks
9
Followers
323
Followers
21
Votes
22
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Based on Enterprise Integration Patterns
  • 4
    Highly configurable
  • 4
    Has over 250 components
  • 4
    Free (open source)
  • 3
    Open Source
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Gmail
Gmail
Datadog
Datadog
Slack
Slack
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
OpenStack
OpenStack
Vault
Vault
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Apache Camel, Rafay Systems?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase