StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Apache Cordova vs Expo

Apache Cordova vs Expo

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
Stacks686
Followers892
Votes218
GitHub Stars955
Forks345
Expo
Expo
Stacks811
Followers693
Votes66

Apache Cordova vs Expo: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Cordova and Expo are both frameworks that allow developers to build mobile applications using web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. However, there are several key differences between these two frameworks that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Development Environment: One of the main differences between Apache Cordova and Expo is the development environment. Apache Cordova allows developers to build mobile apps using their own preferred tools and libraries, while Expo provides a more streamlined development experience with its own set of tools and libraries. This means that developers who are already familiar with certain tools or libraries may prefer using Apache Cordova for more flexibility, while developers who prefer a more integrated and simplified development process may opt for Expo.

  2. Native Module Support: Another important difference between Apache Cordova and Expo is the level of native module support. Apache Cordova allows developers to access and utilize native device features by using plugins, which can be developed separately. This provides developers with a high level of flexibility and customization, as they can include specific native functionality in their apps. On the other hand, Expo provides a more limited set of pre-built native modules, which may not cover all the functionalities required by some applications. This means that developers who require extensive native module support may choose Apache Cordova, while those who can work within the confines of Expo's pre-built modules may prefer using Expo.

  3. Offline Support: Offline support is another difference between Apache Cordova and Expo. Apache Cordova allows developers to build applications that can work offline by using local storage and caching strategies. This is particularly useful for applications that require offline functionality, such as note-taking or document editing apps. Expo, on the other hand, does not provide built-in offline support, which means that developers would need to implement their own offline functionality if required. Developers who need offline support may choose Apache Cordova for its built-in capabilities, while those who do not require offline functionality may opt for Expo.

  4. Build and deployment process: The build and deployment process is another distinction between Apache Cordova and Expo. Apache Cordova requires developers to set up their own build environment, which involves configuring and managing SDKs, build tools, and other dependencies. This can be time-consuming and may require some technical expertise. Expo, on the other hand, offers a simpler build and deployment process, where developers can build their applications in the Expo cloud and then deploy them directly to mobile devices using the Expo Client app. This makes the build and deployment process more accessible to developers who may not have extensive knowledge or experience with complex build environments.

  5. Platform Support: Apache Cordova supports a wide range of platforms, including iOS, Android, Windows, and more. This makes it a versatile choice for developers who want to target multiple platforms with a single codebase. Expo, on the other hand, focuses primarily on iOS and Android, with limited support for other platforms. This means that developers who require cross-platform compatibility may choose Apache Cordova, while those who primarily target iOS and Android may prefer using Expo.

  6. Access to Device APIs: When it comes to accessing hardware features of mobile devices, Apache Cordova and Expo take different approaches. Apache Cordova allows developers to access device APIs directly by using plugins, providing a high level of control and customization. Expo, on the other hand, encapsulates device APIs behind a set of pre-built modules, which abstract the underlying functionality. This means that developers who need fine-grained control over device APIs may choose Apache Cordova, while those who prefer a simpler and more consistent API may opt for Expo.

In summary, Apache Cordova offers more flexibility and customization options with its open development environment, extensive native module support, offline capabilities, and broad platform support. Expo, on the other hand, provides a streamlined development experience, simpler build and deployment process, and a more consistent API for accessing device features. The choice between Apache Cordova and Expo ultimately depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the developer and their project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Cordova, Expo

John
John

Feb 11, 2021

Decided

Our stack roughly divides into three major components, the front-end, back-end and the data storage.

For the front-end, we have decided to go with React Native via Expo. This allows us to target both Android and iOS with a single codebase. Expo provides "managed workflows" and an SDK that will simplify development and deployment.

For the back-end, we have decided to use Python. Python is the language of choice for machine learning (ML). It has extensive support for traditional ML algorithms (e.g. random forests) via Scikit-Learn and the SciPy ecosystem. On top of this, our industry partner has provided us their current solution written in Python. We decided to expose the back-end as a REST API using FastAPI. This allows us to nicely separate concerns from the rest of the codebase. FastAPIs use of static type hints, validation with Pydantic, and automated documentation allows us to build better APIs faster.

For data storage we decided to use a MongoDB Atlas, a NoSQL database. We decided to use a NoSQL database because we need to store large amounts of data (e.g data from the wearable IMUs). Moreover, due to the ever changing nature of a startup we require flexibility. NoSQL databases are schema-free which enables us to modify our schema as we see fit.

We plan on using GitHub Actions (GA) to orchestrate our CI/CD. Given GAs broad support of languages and workflows, it's hard to go wrong with this decision. We will also be using GitHub for version control and project management, so having everything in one place is convenient.

The major components of our CI/CD for the backend will consist of black for autoformatting, flake8 for linting, pytest for unit-testing, and mypy for static type checking and codecov for coverage reporting. We plan to use separate Docker containers to package the back-end and front-end components and use Docker Compose to launch the app. This allows us to better separate concerns, manage dependencies, and ensure our app is deployable anywhere.

109k views109k
Comments
Furqan
Furqan

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonReact NativeReact Native

Hello guys, I am new here. So, if I posted without specific guidelines, please ignore.

Basically, I am an iOS developer and developing native apps for the last three years. Recently, I started learning React Native to develop apps for both platforms. If anyone out there knows any useful resources that will become a better react native developer.

@{#newbie}|topic:null|

325k views325k
Comments
b-sts
b-sts

Mar 18, 2021

Needs adviceonSails.jsSails.jsApache CordovaApache CordovaJavaScriptJavaScript

Heya, I'm very new on here! And I hope I can get advice on this matter :

We are working on a new app. The web version is on Sails.js (V1)/node.js/vue.js. Started with the Web App default settings (including login and payments, which we are using use). We started with a web version to give access to the customer to start creating the data while building the mobile version. (iOS and Android)

I heard of Apache Cordova, that using the same JavaScript/css could be used to not re-code the front-end of the app for iPhones and Androids. I've been told that it is end-of-life now (? - I couldn't find this info myself).

I saw that Vue Native might be an alternative and would only need a few adjustments from our web version as we are using Vue.js for the frontend.

I know next to nothing on this, so I would really appreciate it if you guys could point me to possible solutions you've used and why instead of searching through all the existing solutions. (I'm very open to know if there are alternatives to those two too !!)

We will need to be using the GPS functions of the mobiles, which is a big part of the app.

Thank you!

100k views100k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
Expo
Expo

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Cross-platform (CLI) workflow;Platform-centered workflow;Hundreds of plugins
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
955
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
345
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
686
Stacks
811
Followers
892
Followers
693
Votes
218
Votes
66
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 48
    Lots of plugins
  • 35
    JavaScript
  • 26
    Great community
  • 25
    Easy Development
  • 18
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    No native performance
  • 1
    Hard to install
  • 0
    Hard to install
Pros
  • 15
    Free
  • 13
    Hot Reload
  • 9
    Easy to learn
  • 9
    Common ios and android app setup
  • 6
    Open Source
Integrations
No integrations available
React Native
React Native

What are some alternatives to Apache Cordova, Expo?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Vue Native

Vue Native

Vue Native is a mobile framework to build truly native mobile app using Vue.js. Its is designed to connect React Native and Vue.js. Vue Native is a wrapper around React Native APIs, which allows you to use Vue.js and compose rich mobile User Interface.

Shoutem UI

Shoutem UI

Shoutem UI is a set of styleable components that enables you to build beautiful React Native applications for iOS and Android. All of our components are built to be both composable and customizable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase