Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apollo vs Parse vs Parse-Server: What are the differences?
Introduction
In the realm of backend as a service (BaaS), Apollo and Parse are two popular names. Here, we will delve into the key differences between Apollo and Parse, specifically Parse-Server.
Data Storage: Apollo is primarily a GraphQL client that allows you to fetch and manage data stored on various endpoints efficiently. On the other hand, Parse is a BaaS platform that provides a complete backend solution, including data storage, user authentication, and push notifications. Parse-Server is an open-source version of Parse that can be self-hosted and offers more customization options for data storage compared to Parse.
Deployment: When it comes to deployment, Apollo typically requires a separate server to handle business logic and database interactions as it is more of a client-side library. In contrast, Parse and Parse-Server offer a comprehensive backend infrastructure out of the box, making it easier to deploy and scale applications without the need for additional server management.
Scalability: Apollo's scalability largely depends on how the server is set up to handle GraphQL queries efficiently. Parse-Server, being a full-fledged BaaS solution, comes with built-in scalability features that can handle large volumes of data and requests without significant manual intervention. This makes Parse-Server a more attractive option for applications expecting rapid growth.
Community Support: Apollo has a robust community of developers due to its association with GraphQL and is well-supported by GraphQL services and libraries. On the other hand, Parse's community support has dwindled over the years since Facebook relinquished control over the platform. Parse-Server, being open-source, relies heavily on the community for updates and maintenance.
Language Support: Apollo is language-agnostic and can be used with any programming language that supports GraphQL. Parse, however, has SDKs available for popular languages such as JavaScript, Swift, and Java, making it easy to integrate with different platforms. Parse-Server inherits this language support and expands it further through community contributions.
Real-time Capabilities: Apollo's real-time capabilities are powered by subscriptions in GraphQL, allowing clients to receive live updates from the server. Parse-Server supports real-time capabilities through its LiveQuery feature, enabling developers to subscribe to changes in the database in real-time. This makes Parse-Server a suitable choice for applications requiring instant updates and notifications.
In Summary, Apollo is more focused on client-side data management with GraphQL, while Parse and Parse-Server offer comprehensive backend solutions with data storage, user authentication, and real-time capabilities. Parse-Server, being open-source, provides more customization options and scalability features compared to Parse.
We wanted to save as much time as possible when writing our back-end, therefore Apollo was out of the question, we went for an auto-generated API instead. Hasura looked good in the beginning, but we wanted to retain the ability to add a few manual resolvers and modifications to auto-generated ones, which ruled out Hasura. Postgraphile with its Plug-In architecture was the right choice for us, we never regretted it!
Pros of Apollo
- From the creators of Meteor12
- Great documentation8
- Open source3
- Real time if use subscription2
Pros of Parse
- Easy setup118
- Free hosting78
- Well-documented62
- Cheap52
- Use push notifications in 3 lines of code47
- Fast41
- Cloud code39
- Good for prototypes32
- Cloud modules31
- Backed by facebook27
- Parse Push7
- Cross Platform7
- Parse Analytics6
- Multiplatform6
- Parse Core6
- Quick chat and profile capabilities5
- Free Tier5
- Cloud Based5
- Nice security concept4
- Free4
- About to Die3
- Local Datastore3
- Backend as a service3
- Backbone Models3
- Geopoints3
- Anonymous Users2
- Easy to use2
Pros of Parse-Server
- Open Source13
- Well documented7
- Easy setup, easy api, Fast,more platforms,realtime4
- No vendor lock-in3
- JSON2
- Backed by People2
- Friendly contributor community1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apollo
- File upload is not supported1
- Increase in complexity of implementing (subscription)1
Cons of Parse
Cons of Parse-Server
- No guarantee (comes as is)1