StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Mobile Backend
  5. Apollo vs Parse vs Parse-Server

Apollo vs Parse vs Parse-Server

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Parse
Parse
Stacks537
Followers479
Votes601
Parse-Server
Parse-Server
Stacks191
Followers238
Votes32
Apollo
Apollo
Stacks2.7K
Followers1.8K
Votes25

Apollo vs Parse vs Parse-Server: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of backend as a service (BaaS), Apollo and Parse are two popular names. Here, we will delve into the key differences between Apollo and Parse, specifically Parse-Server.

  1. Data Storage: Apollo is primarily a GraphQL client that allows you to fetch and manage data stored on various endpoints efficiently. On the other hand, Parse is a BaaS platform that provides a complete backend solution, including data storage, user authentication, and push notifications. Parse-Server is an open-source version of Parse that can be self-hosted and offers more customization options for data storage compared to Parse.

  2. Deployment: When it comes to deployment, Apollo typically requires a separate server to handle business logic and database interactions as it is more of a client-side library. In contrast, Parse and Parse-Server offer a comprehensive backend infrastructure out of the box, making it easier to deploy and scale applications without the need for additional server management.

  3. Scalability: Apollo's scalability largely depends on how the server is set up to handle GraphQL queries efficiently. Parse-Server, being a full-fledged BaaS solution, comes with built-in scalability features that can handle large volumes of data and requests without significant manual intervention. This makes Parse-Server a more attractive option for applications expecting rapid growth.

  4. Community Support: Apollo has a robust community of developers due to its association with GraphQL and is well-supported by GraphQL services and libraries. On the other hand, Parse's community support has dwindled over the years since Facebook relinquished control over the platform. Parse-Server, being open-source, relies heavily on the community for updates and maintenance.

  5. Language Support: Apollo is language-agnostic and can be used with any programming language that supports GraphQL. Parse, however, has SDKs available for popular languages such as JavaScript, Swift, and Java, making it easy to integrate with different platforms. Parse-Server inherits this language support and expands it further through community contributions.

  6. Real-time Capabilities: Apollo's real-time capabilities are powered by subscriptions in GraphQL, allowing clients to receive live updates from the server. Parse-Server supports real-time capabilities through its LiveQuery feature, enabling developers to subscribe to changes in the database in real-time. This makes Parse-Server a suitable choice for applications requiring instant updates and notifications.

In Summary, Apollo is more focused on client-side data management with GraphQL, while Parse and Parse-Server offer comprehensive backend solutions with data storage, user authentication, and real-time capabilities. Parse-Server, being open-source, provides more customization options and scalability features compared to Parse.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Parse, Parse-Server, Apollo

Márton
Márton

CTO at Media4Care

Aug 31, 2020

Decided

We wanted to save as much time as possible when writing our back-end, therefore Apollo was out of the question, we went for an auto-generated API instead. Hasura looked good in the beginning, but we wanted to retain the ability to add a few manual resolvers and modifications to auto-generated ones, which ruled out Hasura. Postgraphile with its Plug-In architecture was the right choice for us, we never regretted it!

37.1k views37.1k
Comments
Raj
Raj

CTO & Founder at Novvum

Oct 5, 2020

Review

Hey Brian, it's hard to pick a best tool for any situation, however, there are tools that offer advantages dependent on use case.

Server Side

If you're looking to quickly generate a GraphQL API, you can use a Graphql As A Service like FaunaDB, Slash Graphql, or 8base.

If you want something more advanced on the server side: Prisma with Postgres, Nexus, & Apollo Server (js) is a great stack to try out. Examples here

Check out TypeORM and TypeGraphQL too

If you're have some existing data on Postgres, PostGraphile or Hasura are your best bet!

If you are using a lot of AWS services, check out Amplify and AppSync. Tutorial here

On the client side:

Check out Gatsby! Graphql is already configured and used to query static or remote information at build time. It's a great way to get your feet wet!

Apollo Client is often the choice for more advanced use cases. But URLQL and gqless are some pretty good alternatives too!

Hope this helps! 👍

295 views295
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Parse
Parse
Parse-Server
Parse-Server
Apollo
Apollo

With Parse, you can add a scalable and powerful backend in minutes and launch a full-featured app in record time without ever worrying about server management. We offer push notifications, social integration, data storage, and the ability to add rich custom logic to your app’s backend with Cloud Code.

A Parse.com API compatible router package for Express. Read the announcement blog post here: http://blog.parse.com/announcements/introducing-parse-server-and-the-database-migration-tool/. Read the migration guide here: https://parse.com/docs/server/guide#migrating

Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.

Store basic data types, locations, photos;Update over the air;Data browser lets you manage, search, and update content without writing a single line of code;Push Console allows you to send notifications directly from the Parse web interface;Connect your users via traditional logins or third party social networks with just a few lines of code;Add rich, custom logic to your app’s backend without servers with Cloud Code;Integrate with virtually any third-party service using Cloud Modules
--
Statistics
Stacks
537
Stacks
191
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
479
Followers
238
Followers
1.8K
Votes
601
Votes
32
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 118
    Easy setup
  • 78
    Free hosting
  • 62
    Well-documented
  • 52
    Cheap
  • 47
    Use push notifications in 3 lines of code
Pros
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 4
    Easy setup, easy api, Fast,more platforms,realtime
  • 3
    No vendor lock-in
  • 2
    JSON
Cons
  • 1
    No guarantee (comes as is)
Pros
  • 12
    From the creators of Meteor
  • 8
    Great documentation
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Real time if use subscription
Cons
  • 1
    Increase in complexity of implementing (subscription)
  • 1
    File upload is not supported
Integrations
New Relic
New Relic
Mailgun
Mailgun
Mandrill
Mandrill
CrowdFlower
CrowdFlower
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Stripe
Stripe
Twilio
Twilio
Trigger.io
Trigger.io
No integrations available
GraphQL
GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Parse, Parse-Server, Apollo?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase