StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Mobile Continuous Integration
  5. Appium vs fastlane

Appium vs fastlane

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

fastlane
fastlane
Stacks716
Followers437
Votes74
GitHub Stars40.6K
Forks6.0K
Appium
Appium
Stacks650
Followers574
Votes28
GitHub Stars20.8K
Forks6.2K

Appium vs fastlane: What are the differences?

  1. Automation Testing vs Continuous Deployment: Appium is primarily used for automating mobile app testing across various platforms and devices, whereas fastlane is a tool designed for automating the deployment of iOS and Android apps. While Appium focuses on testing app functionality and user experience, fastlane streamlines the deployment process by automating tasks such as code signing, releasing beta versions, and submitting apps to app stores.

  2. Programming Languages: Appium supports multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, and Ruby, making it versatile for developers with different language preferences. On the other hand, fastlane is predominantly built using Ruby scripts, which can be limiting for developers who are more comfortable with other programming languages. This difference in language support can influence the tool selection based on the development team's skill set and familiarity.

  3. Mobile Platforms Support: Appium is compatible with both iOS and Android platforms, offering a comprehensive solution for cross-platform testing. In contrast, fastlane focuses primarily on iOS app deployment, providing specific tools and workflows tailored to streamline the iOS app release process. This difference in platform support makes Appium a preferred choice for teams working on both iOS and Android projects, while fastlane is more suitable for iOS-centric development environments.

  4. Customization and Configuration: Appium provides extensive customization options through desired capabilities and allows testers to configure test scenarios based on specific requirements. Conversely, fastlane emphasizes predefined workflows and conventions to simplify the deployment process, reducing the need for extensive configuration. This distinction highlights the flexibility of Appium for tailoring test cases to unique app functionalities, while fastlane prioritizes standardized deployment practices for efficient app release cycles.

  5. Community and Support: Appium boasts a robust community of contributors and users, ensuring regular updates, troubleshooting resources, and community-driven plugins for extended functionality. In comparison, fastlane's community, while active, is more focused on iOS app deployment discussions, with resources and support tailored to the unique challenges of app publishing on Apple's platform. The difference in community dynamics and focus areas can influence the level of support and resources available for users of each tool.

  6. Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: Appium can be integrated with various Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) tools to automate testing workflows and streamline the testing process within development pipelines effectively. In contrast, fastlane is specifically designed to work seamlessly with CI/CD platforms like Jenkins and Travis CI to automate the deployment of iOS apps, aligning closely with the continuous delivery practices. This distinction showcases the individual strengths of each tool in optimizing specific stages of the app development lifecycle.

In Summary, the key differences between Appium and fastlane lie in their primary focuses on automation testing versus continuous deployment, language support, platform compatibility, customization options, community support, and integration with CI/CD pipelines. Each tool offers unique advantages based on project requirements and team priorities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

fastlane
fastlane
Appium
Appium

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Works on native and hybrid mobile apps; Write mobile tests using any language or framework; Open source; Facilitates mobile continuous integration; Mobile test automation tool; Cross-platform (iOS, Android); Framework based on Selenium
Statistics
GitHub Stars
40.6K
GitHub Stars
20.8K
GitHub Forks
6.0K
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
716
Stacks
650
Followers
437
Followers
574
Votes
74
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 13
    Itunes connect deployment
  • 11
    Incredible flexability
  • 9
    Third party integrations
Pros
  • 12
    Webdriverio support
  • 6
    Java, C#, Python support
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Great GUI with inspector
  • 2
    Active community
Integrations
Testmunk
Testmunk
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
TestFlight
TestFlight
HockeyApp
HockeyApp
HipChat
HipChat
Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to fastlane, Appium?

Bitrise

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Greenhouse

Greenhouse

Greenhouse automatically builds your project for every commit you make and runs all your unit or UI tests on the emulator/simulator or on real hardware. Automatic build distribution is also supported so that your team and clients are always up to date with the latest state of your apps.

Codemagic

Codemagic

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

EarlGrey

EarlGrey

EarlGrey is a native iOS UI automation test framework that enables you to write clear, concise tests. With the EarlGrey framework, you have access to enhanced synchronization features. EarlGrey automatically synchronizes with the UI, network requests, and various queues; but still allows you to manually implement customized timings, if needed.

Kobiton

Kobiton

It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud.

Kiwi

Kiwi

It is a Behavior Driven Development library for iOS development. The goal is to provide a BDD library that is exquisitely simple to setup and use.

pCloudy

pCloudy

It is a smart mobile app testing solution that lets developers ensure their users enjoy a smooth and consistent experience. With it, developers can access manual and automated testing options to facilitate the swift debugging of their applications.

Magneto

Magneto

Magneto was built by Automation Engineers for Automation Engineers out of necessity for a mobile centric test automation framework that's easy to setup, run and utilize.

Appcircle

Appcircle

Mobile CI/CD from small teams to on-premises Enterprise solutions, Appcircle is a mobile CI/CD platform that provides a fully automated environment to manage mobile app lifecycle end-to-end.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana