Argo vs Avo: What are the differences?

# Introduction
When comparing Argo and Avo, it's important to understand the key differences between these two popular tools for data governance and metadata management.

1. **Integration Capabilities**: Argo offers seamless integration with popular cloud storage providers like AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage, while Avo has a more versatile approach with integrations with BI tools like Looker and Tableau.

2. **User Interface**: Avo boasts a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality for easy metadata management, whereas Argo provides a more technical interface that caters to users comfortable with code and scripts.

3. **Data Lineage Visualization**: Argo visualizes data lineage in a hierarchical tree structure, making it easier for users to track the flow of data, while Avo focuses on providing lineage information in a more detailed, granular format with interactive features for drilling down into specific details.

4. **Collaboration Features**: Avo emphasizes collaboration with features like commenting and sharing metadata assets with team members, fostering better communication and teamwork, whereas Argo focuses more on individual data management tasks without extensive collaboration tools.

5. **Metadata Versioning**: Argo supports metadata versioning, allowing users to track changes over time and revert to previous versions if needed, while Avo lacks this feature, making it potentially more challenging to manage metadata changes and history.

6. **Governance Policies**: Argo provides robust governance policies for enforcing data quality standards and access controls, ensuring data integrity and compliance, whereas Avo offers basic governance functionalities with room for customization based on user needs.

In Summary, the key differences between Argo and Avo lie in their integration capabilities, user interface, data lineage visualization, collaboration features, metadata versioning, and governance policies.