Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Atom vs Webpack: What are the differences?
- Configuration: Atom is primarily a text editor that offers a platform for code editing, while Webpack is a module bundler that transforms and optimizes web assets. Atom focuses on providing a flexible and customizable text editing environment for developers, while Webpack focuses on bundling and managing modules efficiently.
- Live Reload: Atom does not have built-in live reload functionality, requiring developers to use additional packages or extensions. On the other hand, Webpack offers live reloading capabilities, allowing developers to instantly see changes in their code without manually refreshing the browser.
- Plugins and Extensions: Atom boasts a wide range of plugins and extensions that enhance its functionality, enabling developers to customize their editing experience. Webpack also supports plugins, but they are primarily used for optimizing assets, managing dependencies, and integrating with other tools in the development workflow.
- Dependency Management: Atom does not handle dependency management like Webpack does. Webpack allows developers to specify dependencies in their project, bundle them efficiently, and manage their interactions to ensure a smooth and optimized web application.
- Code Splitting: Webpack excels in code splitting, allowing developers to separate code into smaller chunks that can be loaded asynchronously. This feature helps optimize the loading time of web applications by only loading necessary code when it is needed, improving performance.
- Production Optimization: Webpack offers production optimization features such as minification, code splitting, and tree shaking to reduce the size of the final bundle and improve performance. Atom lacks these production-specific optimizations, as it focuses on providing a robust text editing environment rather than optimizing code for deployment.
In Summary, Atom is a text editor focused on providing a customizable editing experience, while Webpack is a module bundler that optimizes web assets, offers live reload, handles dependency management, enables code splitting, and provides production optimization features for web applications.
Since communication with Github is not necessary, the Atom is less convenient in working with text and code. Sublim's support and understanding of projects is best for us. Notepad for us is a completely outdated solution with an unacceptable interface. We use a good theme for Sublim ayu-dark
I could define the next points why we have to migrate:
- Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
- Also
jspm install
takes much more time thannpm install
. - Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.
Pros of Atom
- Free529
- Open source449
- Modular design343
- Hackable321
- Beautiful UI316
- Backed by github147
- Built with node.js119
- Web native113
- Community107
- Packages35
- Cross platform18
- Nice UI5
- Multicursor support5
- TypeScript editor5
- Open source, lots of packages, and so configurable3
- cli start3
- Simple but powerful3
- Chrome Inspector works IN EDITOR3
- Snippets3
- Code readability2
- It's powerful2
- Awesome2
- Smart TypeScript code completion2
- Well documented2
- works with GitLab1
- "Free", "Hackable", "Open Source", The Awesomness1
- full support1
- vim support1
- Split-Tab Layout1
- Apm publish minor1
- Consistent UI on all platforms1
- User friendly1
- Hackable and Open Source1
- Publish0
Pros of Webpack
- Most powerful bundler309
- Built-in dev server with livereload182
- Can handle all types of assets142
- Easy configuration87
- Laravel-mix22
- Overengineered, Underdeveloped4
- Makes it easy to bundle static assets2
- Webpack-Encore2
- Redundant1
- Better support in Browser Dev-Tools1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Atom
- Slow with large files19
- Slow startup7
- Most of the time packages are hard to find.2
- No longer maintained1
- Cannot Run code with F51
- Can be easily Modified1
Cons of Webpack
- Hard to configure15
- No clear direction5
- Spaghetti-Code out of the box2
- SystemJS integration is quite lackluster2
- Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)2
- Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers2