Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Auth0 vs Azure Active Directory: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Auth0 and Azure Active Directory
Auth0 and Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) are both popular identity and access management (IAM) solutions that provide authentication and authorization capabilities for applications and services. However, there are several key differences between the two:
Integrations: Auth0 offers a wide range of integrations with various popular identity providers, social login providers, and enterprise directories. This allows developers to easily connect their applications to different identity sources. On the other hand, Azure AD primarily focuses on integrating with Microsoft services and technologies, making it a better fit for organizations already using Microsoft products.
Scalability and Performance: Auth0 is built on a highly scalable and robust infrastructure that can handle millions of users and authenticate them rapidly. It has global availability with multiple data centers across the world. Azure AD also offers high scalability and performance, but it may be more suitable for organizations with a predominantly Microsoft-centric environment.
Customization and Extensibility: Auth0 provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor the authentication and authorization workflows to meet the specific requirements of their applications. It also supports custom branding and user experiences. Azure AD, on the other hand, has some customization capabilities, but it is more focused on providing out-of-the-box integration and functionality.
Pricing Model: Auth0 has a subscription-based pricing model, where customers pay based on the active user count and the features they need. It offers different pricing tiers to accommodate organizations of different sizes. Azure AD is primarily included as part of Microsoft Azure subscriptions, which may have a different pricing structure based on the services and resources consumed.
Multi-tenancy Support: Auth0 provides robust multi-tenancy support, allowing organizations to serve multiple customers or internal departments with independent authentication and authorization capabilities. Azure AD also supports multi-tenancy, but it is more geared towards serving organizations with a single tenant structure.
Identity Providers: Auth0 supports a wide range of identity providers out-of-the-box, including social login providers like Google, Facebook, and LinkedIn, as well as enterprise directories like LDAP and Active Directory Federation Services (ADFS). Azure AD also supports various identity providers and protocols, but it has a stronger integration with Microsoft accounts and services.
In summary, Auth0 offers more flexibility and customization options, supports a wider range of integrations, and has a scalable infrastructure, while Azure AD integrates well with Microsoft services, provides out-of-the-box functionality, and is a suitable choice for organizations with a Microsoft-centric environment.
Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?
As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?
I would recommend Auth0 only if you are willing to shell out money. You can keep up with their free version only for a very limited time and as per our experience as a growing startup where budget is an issue, their support was not very helpful as they first asked us to sign a commercial agreement even before helping us t o find out whether Auth0 fits our use case or not! But otherwise Auth0 is a great platform to speed up authentication. In our case we had to move to alternatives like Casbin for multi-tenant authorization!
I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.
When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.
The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.
Pros of Auth0
- JSON web token70
- Integration with 20+ Social Providers31
- It's a universal solution20
- SDKs20
- Amazing Documentation15
- Heroku Add-on11
- Enterprise support8
- Great Sample Repos7
- Extend platform with "rules"7
- Azure Add-on4
- Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider3
- Passwordless3
- It can integrate seamlessly with firebase2
- Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support2
- Polished2
- On-premise deployment2
- Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance1
- MFA1
- Active Directory support1
- Springboot1
- SOC21
- SAML Support1
- Great support1
- OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support1
Pros of Azure Active Directory
- Backed by Microsoft Azure6
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Auth0
- Pricing too high (Developer Pro)15
- Poor support7
- Rapidly changing API4
- Status page not reflect actual status4
Cons of Azure Active Directory
- Closed source3