StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Auth0 vs Azure Active Directory

Auth0 vs Azure Active Directory

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.4K
Followers2.1K
Votes215
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Stacks697
Followers283
Votes6

Auth0 vs Azure Active Directory: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Auth0 and Azure Active Directory

Auth0 and Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) are both popular identity and access management (IAM) solutions that provide authentication and authorization capabilities for applications and services. However, there are several key differences between the two:

  1. Integrations: Auth0 offers a wide range of integrations with various popular identity providers, social login providers, and enterprise directories. This allows developers to easily connect their applications to different identity sources. On the other hand, Azure AD primarily focuses on integrating with Microsoft services and technologies, making it a better fit for organizations already using Microsoft products.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Auth0 is built on a highly scalable and robust infrastructure that can handle millions of users and authenticate them rapidly. It has global availability with multiple data centers across the world. Azure AD also offers high scalability and performance, but it may be more suitable for organizations with a predominantly Microsoft-centric environment.

  3. Customization and Extensibility: Auth0 provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor the authentication and authorization workflows to meet the specific requirements of their applications. It also supports custom branding and user experiences. Azure AD, on the other hand, has some customization capabilities, but it is more focused on providing out-of-the-box integration and functionality.

  4. Pricing Model: Auth0 has a subscription-based pricing model, where customers pay based on the active user count and the features they need. It offers different pricing tiers to accommodate organizations of different sizes. Azure AD is primarily included as part of Microsoft Azure subscriptions, which may have a different pricing structure based on the services and resources consumed.

  5. Multi-tenancy Support: Auth0 provides robust multi-tenancy support, allowing organizations to serve multiple customers or internal departments with independent authentication and authorization capabilities. Azure AD also supports multi-tenancy, but it is more geared towards serving organizations with a single tenant structure.

  6. Identity Providers: Auth0 supports a wide range of identity providers out-of-the-box, including social login providers like Google, Facebook, and LinkedIn, as well as enterprise directories like LDAP and Active Directory Federation Services (ADFS). Azure AD also supports various identity providers and protocols, but it has a stronger integration with Microsoft accounts and services.

In summary, Auth0 offers more flexibility and customization options, supports a wider range of integrations, and has a scalable infrastructure, while Azure AD integrates well with Microsoft services, provides out-of-the-box functionality, and is a suitable choice for organizations with a Microsoft-centric environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Auth0, Azure Active Directory

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Auth0
Auth0
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.

User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
-
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
697
Followers
2.1K
Followers
283
Votes
215
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
Pros
  • 6
    Backed by Microsoft Azure
Cons
  • 3
    Closed source
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Auth0, Azure Active Directory?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

bitwarden

bitwarden

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Passbolt

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

KeePass

KeePass

It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

KeePassXC

KeePassXC

It is a cross-platform community-driven port of the Windows application “Keepass Password Safe”. It can store your passwords safely and auto-type them into your everyday websites and applications.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope