StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Social API
  5. Auth0 vs Castle vs Singly

Auth0 vs Castle vs Singly

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Singly
Singly
Stacks8
Followers20
Votes1
Auth0
Auth0
Stacks1.4K
Followers2.1K
Votes215
Castle
Castle
Stacks47
Followers62
Votes0

Auth0 vs Castle vs Singly: What are the differences?

Introduction

Auth0, Castle, and Singly are all authentication and authorization platforms that help developers secure their web applications and manage user authentication. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. This markdown provides a comparison of these three platforms highlighting their unique features and functionalities.

  1. Deployment Options: Auth0 offers a cloud-based solution where developers can easily deploy and manage their authentication system without worrying about infrastructure. On the other hand, Castle provides both cloud and on-premises deployment options, allowing developers to choose the deployment method that best suits their requirements. Singly, however, focuses mainly on cloud-based deployment, making it a more suitable choice for developers who prefer a fully managed cloud solution.

  2. Ease of Integration: Auth0 provides extensive documentation, SDKs, and libraries for a wide range of platforms and languages, making it easy to integrate with new or existing applications. Castle, as an identity and access management platform, requires developers to modify their application code to use Castle's APIs and services for user authentication and authorization. Singly, similar to Auth0, offers rich documentation and SDKs to help developers easily integrate their applications with Singly's authentication services.

  3. Customization and Flexibility: Auth0 offers a highly customizable authentication and authorization platform, allowing developers to tailor the user experience, branding, and workflows to match their application's requirements. Castle, on the other hand, focuses more on security and offers features like risk-based authentication and fraud detection, providing enhanced security measures to protect user accounts. Singly, like Auth0, provides developers with the flexibility to customize authentication and authorization workflows to fit their application's needs.

  4. User Data Management: Auth0 offers user management functionalities that allow developers to store and manage user data directly within the Auth0 platform. Castle, however, does not focus on user data management and typically relies on external user stores such as Active Directory or LDAP for user data management. Singly, similar to Auth0, provides user management capabilities, allowing developers to store and manage user data within Singly's platform.

  5. Identity Providers Support: Auth0 supports a wide range of identity providers, including social login providers (such as Facebook, Google, and GitHub), enterprise identity providers (such as Active Directory and Azure AD), and database connections. Castle, on the other hand, does not explicitly mention support for external identity providers. Singly, similar to Auth0, offers support for multiple identity providers, enabling developers to provide various login options to their users.

  6. Pricing Model: Auth0 offers a pricing model based on the number of active users, which allows developers to scale their authentication system based on their application's usage. Castle, on the other hand, has a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on the number of users, providing developers with predictable pricing options. Singly, similar to Auth0, offers a pricing model based on the number of users, making it cost-effective for applications of varying sizes.

In summary, the key differences between Auth0, Castle, and Singly lie in their deployment options, ease of integration, customization and flexibility, user data management, support for identity providers, and pricing models. Developers can choose the platform that aligns with their specific requirements and preferences, whether it's the ease of deployment, focus on security, or flexibility in customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Singly, Auth0, Castle

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Singly
Singly
Auth0
Auth0
Castle
Castle

Integrate people’s contacts, photos, locations, fitness data, and more into your app. Fighting with OAuth annoyances, building data crawlers, and juggling rate-limits slow you down and distract you. Singly makes API integration fast, painless, and reliable so you can focus on what you do best. Singly social login simplifies authentication across 35 services, allowing you to leverage any and all of these existing login credentials, providing access to the personal data that the services have been granted from the individual. Singly social sharing unifies sharing APIs making it easy to post out to social networks so your app grows organically. Instead of integrating with every social network’s sharing APIs, just POST once to Singly and specify where you want it to go.

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Castle looks for suspicious login patterns without bothering the legitimate user nor the site administrator. The fully-automated anti-hijack engine identifies potential account compromises based on where the user logs in from and how they navigate the site.

Intelligent Friending it lets users find the friends they care about most, by sorting by how often they interact and how closely they are connected, surfacing the most important friends right to the top.;Singly Deep Data provides full access to all the data from each service provider, including photos, checkins, statuses, links and more. Query based on location, time or keyword. We provide clean, consistent data formats and deduplicates cross-posts (e.g. Instagram → Twitter).;Push Updates- Turn off your crawlers and get new data sent straight to you.;Archived data- Keep around API data that otherwise has a shelf life, like a user’s incoming Twitter feed.;Intelligent Indexing- Search by Time, Keyword, Location and Participants (liked, tagged, etc.), even if the original API doesn’t.;Faster Syncing- New data in minutes, not hours.;Social Data for Miles- Pull in data feeds from 18 services and counting for your users and their friends.;Aggregation- All of a data type—like photos— in one place, no matter which services they were found on.;Deduplication- Did someone post to Tumblr from Instagram and syndicate it to Twitter and Facebook? We got your back.;Volume Discounts- Millions of users? Nice work. They don’t have to cost millions of dollars.
User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
Security Analytics; Threat Alerts; Login Notification Emails; Threat Segments; Adaptive Authentication
Statistics
Stacks
8
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
47
Followers
20
Followers
2.1K
Followers
62
Votes
1
Votes
215
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    DOA now as Appcelerator
  • 0
    <a href="https://staysuperfit.com/">Very Helpful</a>
Pros
  • 70
    JSON web token
  • 31
    Integration with 20+ Social Providers
  • 20
    It's a universal solution
  • 20
    SDKs
  • 15
    Amazing Documentation
Cons
  • 15
    Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
  • 7
    Poor support
  • 4
    Status page not reflect actual status
  • 4
    Rapidly changing API
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Parse
Parse
Firebase
Firebase
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Laravel
Laravel
Python
Python
Java
Java
Spring
Spring
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Singly, Auth0, Castle?

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope