Auth0 vs Zapier

Overview

Zapier

Stacks1.6K

Followers1.2K

Votes114

Auth0

Stacks1.4K

Followers2.1K

Votes215

Auth0 vs Zapier: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of technology, Auth0 and Zapier are two popular platforms that serve different purposes. Below are the key differences between Auth0 and Zapier.

Purpose: Auth0 is an identity management platform that focuses on providing authentication and authorization services for applications, ensuring secure access to users. On the other hand, Zapier is an automation tool that connects different apps and services to automate workflows and data transfer between them.
Integration: Auth0 primarily integrates with applications to provide a secure authentication process, including social media login, single sign-on, and multi-factor authentication. In contrast, Zapier connects with a wide range of apps to facilitate automation by creating "Zaps" or workflows triggered by predefined events.
Target Audience: Auth0 is targeted towards developers and organizations looking for robust identity management solutions to secure their applications and user data. Meanwhile, Zapier caters to a broader audience, including non-technical users, small businesses, and enterprises seeking to streamline their workflows without extensive coding knowledge.
Customization: Auth0 offers extensive customization options for authentication processes, such as branding, access policies, and user permissions, providing a personalized experience for both developers and end-users. Conversely, Zapier emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, offering pre-built integrations and templates for automation tasks with minimal configuration required.
Security: Auth0 places a strong emphasis on security, offering features like anomaly detection, threat analytics, and encryption to protect user identities and data. In comparison, Zapier focuses more on automation efficiency and usability, with encryption for data in transit and rest but without the same level of advanced security features as Auth0.
Pricing Model: Auth0 operates on a subscription-based pricing model, charging customers based on the number of active users and additional features required. Zapier offers a freemium model, allowing users to create a limited number of Zaps for free and requiring payment for advanced features and higher usage limits.

In Summary, Auth0 focuses on identity management for applications with a strong focus on security, while Zapier specializes in automating workflows between different apps for efficiency and productivity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zapier, Auth0

Yisroel

Jul 7, 2020

Needs adviceon

Mailchimp

QuickBooks

Tray.io

Hey! We are Raisegiving, a payments platform geared towards helping nonprofits raise money and manage donors. We are looking to give our Users (Admins of nonprofits) the ability to integrate their Raisegiving account with other tools such as Mailchimp and QuickBooks.

Examples of desired use cases:

Users should be able to sync Raisegiving audience with their Mailchimp audience, trigger the creation of a new Mailchimp audience based on data from their Raisegiving account.
Donations made on our platform should sync with users Quickbooks account.

Does anyone have any helpful insights into the pros and cons of Tray.io vs Zapier?

111k views111k

Comments

Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k

Comments

Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zapier	Auth0
Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.	A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.
A Zap is a blueprint for a task you want to do over and over. In words, a Zap looks like this: "When I get a new thing in A, do this other thing in B." The first part is the trigger and the second part is the action. An example is "When I get a new entry from a Wufoo form, create a new lead in Salesforce.";You can pick what fields from the trigger service should go to the action service and you can use static text and custom fields too. For instance, you might say that the phone number from your Wufoo form should be the work phone of your new Salesforce lead.;Zapier regularly checks your trigger for new data. When the Zap triggers, Zapier automatically performs your action for you. Continuing with the Wufoo scenario, say you receive five new entries. Zapier takes each one and makes a new lead in Salesforce, customized to the way you specified in your Zap.;Without any more effort from you, data flows from one service to the other	User and Password support with verification and forgot password email workflow; Painless SAML Auth with Enterprises; Integration with 20+ Social Providers; SDKs for all platforms mobile and web; Token-based authentication for APIs
Statistics
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 1.4K
Followers 1.2K	Followers 2.1K
Votes 114	Votes 215
Pros & Cons
Pros 45 Sync cloud services 34 Easy setup 15 Scheduled tasks 8 Great customer support 6 Integrates with Trello	Pros 70 JSON web token 31 Integration with 20+ Social Providers 20 It's a universal solution 20 SDKs 15 Amazing Documentation Cons 15 Pricing too high (Developer Pro) 7 Poor support 4 Rapidly changing API 4 Status page not reflect actual status
Integrations
No integrations available	Amazon S3 Salesforce Sales Cloud Parse Firebase Ruby PHP Laravel Python Java Spring

What are some alternatives to Zapier, Auth0?

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

IFTTT

It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.

n8n

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

Related Comparisons

Auth0 vs Zapier: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of technology, Auth0 and Zapier are two popular platforms that serve different purposes. Below are the key differences between Auth0 and Zapier.

Purpose: Auth0 is an identity management platform that focuses on providing authentication and authorization services for applications, ensuring secure access to users. On the other hand, Zapier is an automation tool that connects different apps and services to automate workflows and data transfer between them.
Integration: Auth0 primarily integrates with applications to provide a secure authentication process, including social media login, single sign-on, and multi-factor authentication. In contrast, Zapier connects with a wide range of apps to facilitate automation by creating "Zaps" or workflows triggered by predefined events.
Target Audience: Auth0 is targeted towards developers and organizations looking for robust identity management solutions to secure their applications and user data. Meanwhile, Zapier caters to a broader audience, including non-technical users, small businesses, and enterprises seeking to streamline their workflows without extensive coding knowledge.
Customization: Auth0 offers extensive customization options for authentication processes, such as branding, access policies, and user permissions, providing a personalized experience for both developers and end-users. Conversely, Zapier emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, offering pre-built integrations and templates for automation tasks with minimal configuration required.
Security: Auth0 places a strong emphasis on security, offering features like anomaly detection, threat analytics, and encryption to protect user identities and data. In comparison, Zapier focuses more on automation efficiency and usability, with encryption for data in transit and rest but without the same level of advanced security features as Auth0.
Pricing Model: Auth0 operates on a subscription-based pricing model, charging customers based on the number of active users and additional features required. Zapier offers a freemium model, allowing users to create a limited number of Zaps for free and requiring payment for advanced features and higher usage limits.

Auth0 vs Zapier

Overview