AWS CodeBuild vs LambCI

Overview

LambCI

Stacks4

Followers13

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.0K

Forks191

AWS CodeBuild

Stacks443

Followers485

Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs LambCI: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go model where you are charged based on usage of the build resources, while LambCI is open-source and available for free for use within your own AWS account.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with various AWS services such as CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and S3, allowing for a complete CI/CD workflow within the AWS ecosystem. LambCI, on the other hand, is designed to be a lightweight, standalone solution primarily for Lambda functions, with limited integration capabilities with other AWS services.
Customization Options: AWS CodeBuild provides extensive customization options through buildspec.yml files, allowing users to define build environments, phases, commands, caching, and more. LambCI offers fewer customization options and focuses on simplicity and ease of use for Lambda deployments.
Managed Service: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service provided by AWS, which takes care of infrastructure provisioning, scalability, and maintenance. LambCI, being an open-source project, requires self-hosting and management by the user, which may require additional effort and resources.
Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is designed to handle large-scale builds and parallel executions efficiently, making it suitable for enterprise-level CI/CD pipelines. LambCI, being more lightweight, may have limitations in handling large workloads and may not scale as effectively as AWS CodeBuild.
Support and Maintenance: AWS CodeBuild comes with official support from AWS, including documentation, forums, and customer service, ensuring timely assistance and resolution of issues. LambCI, being a community-driven open-source project, may rely on community support and may not offer the same level of official support and maintenance as AWS CodeBuild.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and LambCI differ in pricing model, integration with AWS services, customization options, managed service nature, scalability, and support & maintenance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LambCI	AWS CodeBuild
LambCI is a package you can upload to AWS Lambda that gets triggered when you push new code or open pull requests on GitHub and runs your tests (in the Lambda environment itself) – in the same vein as Jenkins, Travis or CircleCI.	AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.
-	Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 191	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 4	Stacks 443
Followers 13	Followers 485
Votes 0	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 7 Pay per minute 5 Parameter Store integration for passing secrets 4 Integrated with AWS 3 Bit bucket integration 3 Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch Cons 2 Poor branch support
Integrations
AWS Lambda GitHub	AWS Elastic Beanstalk AWS CodeCommit Amazon S3 GitHub Bitbucket AWS CloudFormation Jenkins GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to LambCI, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeBuild vs LambCI: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go model where you are charged based on usage of the build resources, while LambCI is open-source and available for free for use within your own AWS account.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with various AWS services such as CodeCommit, CodePipeline, and S3, allowing for a complete CI/CD workflow within the AWS ecosystem. LambCI, on the other hand, is designed to be a lightweight, standalone solution primarily for Lambda functions, with limited integration capabilities with other AWS services.
Customization Options: AWS CodeBuild provides extensive customization options through buildspec.yml files, allowing users to define build environments, phases, commands, caching, and more. LambCI offers fewer customization options and focuses on simplicity and ease of use for Lambda deployments.
Managed Service: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service provided by AWS, which takes care of infrastructure provisioning, scalability, and maintenance. LambCI, being an open-source project, requires self-hosting and management by the user, which may require additional effort and resources.
Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is designed to handle large-scale builds and parallel executions efficiently, making it suitable for enterprise-level CI/CD pipelines. LambCI, being more lightweight, may have limitations in handling large workloads and may not scale as effectively as AWS CodeBuild.
Support and Maintenance: AWS CodeBuild comes with official support from AWS, including documentation, forums, and customer service, ensuring timely assistance and resolution of issues. LambCI, being a community-driven open-source project, may rely on community support and may not offer the same level of official support and maintenance as AWS CodeBuild.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and LambCI differ in pricing model, integration with AWS services, customization options, managed service nature, scalability, and support & maintenance.

AWS CodeBuild vs LambCI

Overview