AWS CodeCommit vs Buddybuild

Overview

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks326

Followers826

Votes193

Buddybuild

Stacks46

Followers61

Votes41

AWS CodeCommit vs Buddybuild: What are the differences?

AWS CodeCommit: Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools; Buddybuild: A continuous integration, continuous deployment and user feedback platform for iOS and Android development teams. Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

AWS CodeCommit belongs to "Code Collaboration & Version Control" category of the tech stack, while Buddybuild can be primarily classified under "Mobile Continuous Integration".

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

Collaboration
Encryption
Access Control

On the other hand, Buddybuild provides the following key features:

Frictionless Setup: set up a comprehensive CI system for your iOS and Android apps in just minutes.
Customizable Workflow: use and extend buddybuild to meet the needs of your mobile development workflow.
Test with Confidence: maintain and improve the quality of your code base with automated Unit and UI testing

"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider AWS CodeCommit over the competitors, whereas "Easy setup" was stated as the key factor in picking Buddybuild.

iMedicare, Complete Business Online, and Sidecar Interactive are some of the popular companies that use AWS CodeCommit, whereas Buddybuild is used by Hilenium, Perch, and Getaway GmbH. AWS CodeCommit has a broader approval, being mentioned in 25 company stacks & 17 developers stacks; compared to Buddybuild, which is listed in 18 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on AWS CodeCommit, Buddybuild

Kavita

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Bitbucket

Jenkins

Jira

Hi, I need advice. In my project, we are using Bitbucket hosted on-prem, Jenkins, and Jira. Also, we have restrictions not to use any plugins for code review, code quality, code security, etc., with bitbucket. Now we want to migrate to AWS CodeCommit, which would mean that we can use, let's say, Amazon CodeGuru for code reviews and move to AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodePipeline for build automation in the future rather than using Jenkins.

Now I want advice on below.

Is it a good idea to migrate from Bitbucket to AWS Codecommit?
If we want to integrate Jira with AWS Codecommit, then how can we do this? If a developer makes any changes in Jira, then a build should be triggered automatically in AWS and create a Jira ticket if the build fails. So, how can we achieve this?

581k views581k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS CodeCommit	Buddybuild
CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.	Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.
Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration	Frictionless Setup: set up a comprehensive CI system for your iOS and Android apps in just minutes.;Customizable Workflow: use and extend buddybuild to meet the needs of your mobile development workflow.;Test with Confidence: maintain and improve the quality of your code base with automated Unit and UI testing; Effortless Deployment: CD as it should be: one click to send, one click to install.;User Insight: get perfect insight into a tester's experience with buddybuild's mobile SDK.;Connected Services: connect buddybuild with the tools you already use to build your apps.
Statistics
Stacks 326	Stacks 46
Followers 826	Followers 61
Votes 193	Votes 41
Pros & Cons
Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 No fork 2 NO LFS support	Pros 12 Easy setup 8 Beta testing 8 Crazy easy 7 GitHub Integration 3 Crash reporting
Integrations
Git Jenkins	Trello Slack fastlane Jira GitLab GitHub Bitbucket Pivotal Tracker TestFlight

What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit, Buddybuild?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

fastlane

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by AWS CodeCommit are:

Collaboration
Encryption
Access Control

On the other hand, Buddybuild provides the following key features:

Frictionless Setup: set up a comprehensive CI system for your iOS and Android apps in just minutes.
Customizable Workflow: use and extend buddybuild to meet the needs of your mobile development workflow.
Test with Confidence: maintain and improve the quality of your code base with automated Unit and UI testing

"Free private repos" is the primary reason why developers consider AWS CodeCommit over the competitors, whereas "Easy setup" was stated as the key factor in picking Buddybuild.

AWS CodeCommit vs Buddybuild