Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodePipeline vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?
AWS CodePipeline: Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates. CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define; Bitbucket: One place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private repositories. Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
AWS CodePipeline and Bitbucket are primarily classified as "Continuous Deployment" and "Code Collaboration & Version Control" tools respectively.
Some of the features offered by AWS CodePipeline are:
- Workflow Modeling
- AWS Integrations
- Pre-Built Plugins
On the other hand, Bitbucket provides the following key features:
- Unlimited private repositories, charged per user
- Best-in-class Jira integration
- Built-in CI/CD
"Simple to set up" is the top reason why over 3 developers like AWS CodePipeline, while over 896 developers mention "Free private repos" as the leading cause for choosing Bitbucket.
According to the StackShare community, Bitbucket has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1735 company stacks & 1449 developers stacks; compared to AWS CodePipeline, which is listed in 30 company stacks and 15 developer stacks.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of AWS CodePipeline
- Simple to set up13
- Managed service8
- GitHub integration4
- Parallel Execution3
- Automatic deployment2
- Manual Steps Available0
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos905
- Simple setup398
- Nice ui and tools347
- Unlimited private repositories341
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui86
- Pull requests and code reviews84
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration11
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Source Code Insight6
- Price5
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Teamcity2
- Mercurial Support2
- IAM2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM integration2
- Academic license program2
- Multilingual interface2
- Open source friendly2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS CodePipeline
- No project boards2
- No integration with "Power" 365 tools1
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is AWS CodePipeline?
What is Bitbucket?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use AWS CodePipeline?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with AWS CodePipeline?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+4
+32+34