Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CodeStar

25
171
+ 1
8
Glitch

83
175
+ 1
42
Add tool

AWS CodeStar vs Glitch: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS CodeStar and Glitch are both platforms designed to streamline the development process, each with its own unique set of features and capabilities. Below are the key differences between AWS CodeStar and Glitch:

  1. Collaboration: In AWS CodeStar, collaboration is mainly geared towards professional teams working on projects, allowing for integration with other AWS services and enhanced security measures. On the other hand, Glitch is more focused on fostering a community-driven development environment where users can easily share and remix projects with others in a more casual setting.

  2. Scalability: AWS CodeStar is better suited for larger-scale projects that require robust cloud infrastructure and extensive customization options. Glitch, on the other hand, is ideal for smaller projects or prototyping thanks to its simplified interface and easy deployment process, which may lack the scalability needed for enterprise-level applications.

  3. Integration: AWS CodeStar offers seamless integration with a wide range of AWS services, enabling developers to leverage additional functionalities such as automated testing, deployment pipelines, and monitoring tools. In contrast, Glitch provides built-in tools and APIs that are specifically tailored to its platform, restricting the level of integration with external services compared to AWS CodeStar.

  4. Languages and Frameworks: AWS CodeStar supports a variety of programming languages and frameworks, making it suitable for a diverse range of development projects. Glitch, on the other hand, is more limited in terms of supported languages and frameworks, catering more towards web development using JavaScript and Node.js.

  5. Control and Customization: AWS CodeStar offers greater control and customization options for developers, allowing them to fine-tune their development environment and project settings according to their specific requirements. In contrast, Glitch provides a more standardized and user-friendly interface, limiting the extent to which users can customize their development environment.

  6. Pricing: AWS CodeStar follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on their usage of AWS services integrated within the platform. Glitch, on the other hand, is completely free to use, making it a more budget-friendly option for developers looking to experiment or collaborate on projects without incurring costs.

In Summary, AWS CodeStar is better suited for professional teams working on larger-scale projects with a need for robust cloud infrastructure and extensive integration options, while Glitch is ideal for community-driven development, smaller projects, and casual collaboration with its simplified interface and free pricing model.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS CodeStar
Pros of Glitch
  • 3
    Simple to set up
  • 2
    Manual Steps Available
  • 1
    Flexible
  • 1
    Integrations
  • 1
    GitHub integration
  • 12
    Bang! App built
  • 9
    Instant APPification ;)
  • 7
    Auto commits
  • 4
    No no. limitation on free projects
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Tons of usable code
  • 2
    Awesome support
  • 2
    Very fast API creation. Especially for small apps
  • 1
    Github Integration

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS CodeStar
Cons of Glitch
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 5
      UI could be better / cleaner
    • 2
      Limited Support/Diffficult to use Non-JS Languages
    • 1
      Automatically suspends proxies
    • 1
      Not good for big projects
    • 1
      Cannot delete project, only the source code is

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is AWS CodeStar?

    Start new software projects on AWS in minutes using templates for web applications, web services and more.

    What is Glitch?

    Combining automated deployment, instant hosting and collaborative editing, Gomix gets you straight to coding. The apps you create are instantly live, hosted by us, and always up to date with your latest changes. Build products, prototype ideas, and hack solutions to problems.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use AWS CodeStar?
    What companies use Glitch?
    See which teams inside your own company are using AWS CodeStar or Glitch.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS CodeStar?
    What tools integrate with Glitch?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    JavaScriptGitHubGit+33
    20
    2084
    What are some alternatives to AWS CodeStar and Glitch?
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    AWS CodeCommit
    CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
    AWS CodePipeline
    CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.
    Azure DevOps
    Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
    See all alternatives