StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. Identity Verification As A Service
  5. Azure Active Directory vs Okta

Azure Active Directory vs Okta

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Okta
Okta
Stacks436
Followers828
Votes66
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Stacks697
Followers283
Votes6

Azure Active Directory vs Okta: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this document, we will discuss the key differences between Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) and Okta. Both Azure AD and Okta are identity management solutions used for authentication and authorization purposes in the cloud. However, there are some important differences that distinguish these two platforms.

  1. Integration with Microsoft Ecosystem: Azure AD is deeply integrated with other Microsoft services and products, such as Microsoft 365, Azure services, and Windows Server Active Directory. It provides seamless integration with these services, allowing for a unified user experience. On the other hand, Okta is a more platform-agnostic solution and offers integrations with a wide range of applications, including Microsoft services but also non-Microsoft applications.

  2. Scalability and Global Presence: Azure AD is inherently designed to scale and support a large number of users and applications. It is available globally across multiple Azure data centers, providing high availability and low-latency access. Okta, while also scalable, may have slower performance in regions where it has fewer data centers or a smaller presence.

  3. Identity Governance and Compliance: Azure AD provides a comprehensive set of identity governance and compliance features, including Identity Governance and Security Center. These features help organizations enforce access policies, detect potential vulnerabilities, and comply with security and privacy regulations. Okta also offers essential identity governance capabilities but may not have the same level of depth and integration with other compliance tools.

  4. User Experience and Branding: Azure AD provides a customizable sign-in experience, allowing organizations to apply their branding and customize the user interface. It seamlessly integrates with organizational branding elements, providing a consistent experience to end-users. Okta also offers similar branding capabilities, allowing organizations to create a custom login page and branded user interface.

  5. Pricing and Licensing: Azure AD comes bundled with Microsoft 365 plans and Azure subscriptions, making it cost-effective for organizations already using these services. However, for organizations solely looking for an identity management solution, Azure AD has separate pricing plans based on the features required. Okta follows a subscription-based pricing model, which varies based on the number of users and applications.

  6. Third-Party Integration Ecosystem: Okta excels in its wide range of integrations with third-party applications and services. It has an extensive integration network, including thousands of applications, platforms, and identity providers. Azure AD also offers integrations with popular applications and platforms, but its ecosystem may not be as extensive as Okta's.

In summary, while both Azure AD and Okta are reputable identity management solutions, Azure AD offers deeper integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, scalability, and comprehensive identity governance features, while Okta excels in its integration ecosystem, third-party application support, and pricing flexibility. The choice between the two depends on specific organizational requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Okta
Okta
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory

Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning.

It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.

Community Supported Network;Comprehensive App Integrations;Proactive Network Support;Easy App Integration;Find Your Applications;Okta for One Application is Free
-
Statistics
Stacks
436
Stacks
697
Followers
828
Followers
283
Votes
66
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    REST API
  • 9
    SAML
  • 5
    Easy LDAP integration
  • 5
    Protect B2E, B2B, B2C apps
  • 5
    OIDC OpenID Connect
Cons
  • 5
    Pricing is too high
  • 1
    Okta verify (Multi-factor Authentication)
Pros
  • 6
    Backed by Microsoft Azure
Cons
  • 3
    Closed source

What are some alternatives to Okta, Azure Active Directory?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

bitwarden

bitwarden

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

LastPass

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Passbolt

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

KeePass

KeePass

It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope