Overview

Google App Engine

Stacks10.4K

Followers8.1K

Votes611

Azure App Service

Stacks315

Followers380

Votes11

Azure App Service vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Azure App Service and Google App Engine are two popular platforms for developing and deploying web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Programming Languages Support: Azure App Service supports a wide range of programming languages including .NET, Java, Node.js, php, and Python, among others. On the other hand, Google App Engine primarily supports Java, Python, PHP, and Go.
Scaling Options: Azure App Service provides manual scaling as well as automatic scaling options. It allows you to scale up or down based on your application's needs. Google App Engine, on the other hand, automatically scales your application based on the incoming traffic. It provides automatic scaling only.
Database Integration: Azure App Service has native integration with Azure SQL Database, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and other databases. It provides various database deployment options like Azure SQL Database, MySQL in-app, and more. Google App Engine offers integration with Google Cloud SQL, which is a managed MySQL and PostgreSQL service.
Deployment Flexibility: Azure App Service allows you to deploy applications as containers, Docker containers, or as a managed platform. It provides more flexibility in terms of deployment options. Google App Engine, on the other hand, is primarily a managed platform and supports deployment of applications as containers through their flexible environment.
Pricing Model: Azure App Service offers a more granular pricing model where you pay for the specific resources you use, such as CPU, memory, and storage. Google App Engine, on the other hand, has a simpler pricing model based on the number of instances and instance hours used.
Vendor Lock-in: Azure App Service provides more flexibility in terms of vendor lock-in. You can easily migrate your application to other Azure services or even to other cloud providers if needed. Google App Engine, on the other hand, may have more vendor lock-in due to its tight integration with other Google Cloud Platform services.

In summary, Azure App Service supports a wide range of programming languages, provides more deployment flexibility, and has a granular pricing model. Google App Engine primarily supports Java, Python, PHP, and Go, offers automatic scaling, and has tighter integration with other Google Cloud Platform services.

🔥 Trending in Platform as a Service on StackShare

Daytona Platform As A Service

The open source development environment manager

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

6

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine	Azure App Service
Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.	Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.
Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.	-
Statistics
Stacks 10.4K	Stacks 315
Followers 8.1K	Followers 380
Votes 611	Votes 11
Pros & Cons
Pros 145 Easy to deploy 106 Auto scaling 80 Good free plan 62 Easy management 56 Scalability	Pros 6 .Net Framework 5 Visual studio
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces Twilio Twilio SendGrid	Python .NET Ruby PHP Node.js .NET Core

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, Azure App Service?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.