Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure Cosmos DB vs Couchbase: What are the differences?
Introduction
Azure Cosmos DB and Couchbase are both powerful NoSQL databases that provide scalable and flexible solutions for storing and retrieving large amounts of data. However, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of features and capabilities. This article will explore and highlight these differences.
Data Model: Azure Cosmos DB supports multiple data models including SQL, MongoDB, Cassandra, Gremlin, and Table API, allowing users to choose the most suitable model for their application needs. In contrast, Couchbase mainly focuses on the key-value data model, with limited support for JSON documents.
Global Distribution: Azure Cosmos DB offers global distribution with its "multi-master" architecture, allowing data to be replicated across multiple regions and providing low-latency access to data for users worldwide. On the other hand, Couchbase provides limited options for global distribution and replication, which can impact the performance and availability of data in geographically dispersed scenarios.
Scalability: Azure Cosmos DB is designed for massive scalability and can handle high throughput and storage requirements. It seamlessly scales both throughput and storage based on demand. Couchbase also supports scalability, but it has certain limitations compared to Azure Cosmos DB. For example, Couchbase requires manual sharding and rebalancing when scaling the database cluster.
Consistency Models: Azure Cosmos DB offers a range of consistency options, including strong, bounded staleness, session, consistent prefix, and eventual consistency. This allows developers to choose the appropriate consistency level based on their application's requirements. In contrast, Couchbase primarily provides strong consistency guarantees, with limited support for eventual consistency.
Querying: Azure Cosmos DB provides a flexible and powerful querying mechanism with its SQL-like syntax that supports rich queries, joins, and aggregations across different data models. Couchbase offers a limited querying capability with its N1QL language, which is based on SQL and supports some SQL-like operations but may not have the same level of functionality as Azure Cosmos DB.
Serverless Computing: Azure Cosmos DB offers serverless computing capabilities through its integrated Azure Functions, allowing developers to run serverless code against their data. This enables them to build event-driven serverless applications without the need to manage infrastructure or worry about scalability. Couchbase does not provide built-in serverless computing capabilities.
In summary, Azure Cosmos DB stands out with its multi-model support, global distribution, scalability, flexible consistency models, powerful querying capability, and integrated serverless computing capabilities. Couchbase, on the other hand, focuses primarily on key-value data model and offers limited global distribution and scalability options.
We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.
I prefer MongoDB due to own experience with migration of old archive of pdf and meta-data to a new “archive”. The biggest advantage is speed of filters output - a new archive is way faster and reliable then the old one - but also the the easy programming of MongoDB with many code snippets and examples available. I have no personal experience so far with Couchbase. From the architecture point of view both options are OK - go for the one you like.
I would like to suggest MongoDB or ArangoDB (can't choose both, so ArangoDB). MongoDB is more mature, but ArangoDB is more interesting if you will need to bring graph database ideas to solution. For example if some data or some documents are interlinked, then probably ArangoDB is a best solution.
To process tables we used Abbyy software stack. It's great on table extraction.
If you can select text with mouse drag in PDF. Use pdftotext it is fast! You can install it on server with command "apt-get install poppler-utils". Use it like "pdftotext -layout /path-to-your-file". In same folder it will make text file with line by line content. There is few classes on git stacks that you can use, also.
We implemented our first large scale EPR application from naologic.com using CouchDB .
Very fast, replication works great, doesn't consume much RAM, queries are blazing fast but we found a problem: the queries were very hard to write, it took a long time to figure out the API, we had to go and write our own @nodejs library to make it work properly.
It lost most of its support. Since then, we migrated to Couchbase and the learning curve was steep but all worth it. Memcached indexing out of the box, full text search works great.
Pros of Azure Cosmos DB
- Best-of-breed NoSQL features28
- High scalability22
- Globally distributed15
- Automatic indexing over flexible json data model14
- Tunable consistency10
- Always on with 99.99% availability sla10
- Javascript language integrated transactions and queries7
- Predictable performance6
- High performance5
- Analytics Store5
- Rapid Development2
- No Sql2
- Auto Indexing2
- Ease of use2
Pros of Couchbase
- High performance18
- Flexible data model, easy scalability, extremely fast18
- Mobile app support9
- You can query it with Ansi-92 SQL7
- All nodes can be read/write6
- Equal nodes in cluster, allowing fast, flexible changes5
- Both a key-value store and document (JSON) db5
- Open source, community and enterprise editions5
- Automatic configuration of sharding4
- Local cache capability4
- Easy setup3
- Linearly scalable, useful to large number of tps3
- Easy cluster administration3
- Cross data center replication3
- SDKs in popular programming languages3
- Elasticsearch connector3
- Web based management, query and monitoring panel3
- Map reduce views2
- DBaaS available2
- NoSQL2
- Buckets, Scopes, Collections & Documents1
- FTS + SQL together1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure Cosmos DB
- Pricing18
- Poor No SQL query support4
Cons of Couchbase
- Terrible query language3