StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Azure Cosmos DB vs Couchbase

Azure Cosmos DB vs Couchbase

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Couchbase
Couchbase
Stacks505
Followers606
Votes110
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB
Stacks594
Followers1.1K
Votes130

Azure Cosmos DB vs Couchbase: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Cosmos DB and Couchbase are both powerful NoSQL databases that provide scalable and flexible solutions for storing and retrieving large amounts of data. However, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of features and capabilities. This article will explore and highlight these differences.

  1. Data Model: Azure Cosmos DB supports multiple data models including SQL, MongoDB, Cassandra, Gremlin, and Table API, allowing users to choose the most suitable model for their application needs. In contrast, Couchbase mainly focuses on the key-value data model, with limited support for JSON documents.

  2. Global Distribution: Azure Cosmos DB offers global distribution with its "multi-master" architecture, allowing data to be replicated across multiple regions and providing low-latency access to data for users worldwide. On the other hand, Couchbase provides limited options for global distribution and replication, which can impact the performance and availability of data in geographically dispersed scenarios.

  3. Scalability: Azure Cosmos DB is designed for massive scalability and can handle high throughput and storage requirements. It seamlessly scales both throughput and storage based on demand. Couchbase also supports scalability, but it has certain limitations compared to Azure Cosmos DB. For example, Couchbase requires manual sharding and rebalancing when scaling the database cluster.

  4. Consistency Models: Azure Cosmos DB offers a range of consistency options, including strong, bounded staleness, session, consistent prefix, and eventual consistency. This allows developers to choose the appropriate consistency level based on their application's requirements. In contrast, Couchbase primarily provides strong consistency guarantees, with limited support for eventual consistency.

  5. Querying: Azure Cosmos DB provides a flexible and powerful querying mechanism with its SQL-like syntax that supports rich queries, joins, and aggregations across different data models. Couchbase offers a limited querying capability with its N1QL language, which is based on SQL and supports some SQL-like operations but may not have the same level of functionality as Azure Cosmos DB.

  6. Serverless Computing: Azure Cosmos DB offers serverless computing capabilities through its integrated Azure Functions, allowing developers to run serverless code against their data. This enables them to build event-driven serverless applications without the need to manage infrastructure or worry about scalability. Couchbase does not provide built-in serverless computing capabilities.

In summary, Azure Cosmos DB stands out with its multi-model support, global distribution, scalability, flexible consistency models, powerful querying capability, and integrated serverless computing capabilities. Couchbase, on the other hand, focuses primarily on key-value data model and offers limited global distribution and scalability options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Couchbase, Azure Cosmos DB

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at Naologic

Jan 2, 2020

DecidedonCouchDBCouchDBCouchbaseCouchbaseMemcachedMemcached

We implemented our first large scale EPR application from naologic.com using CouchDB .

Very fast, replication works great, doesn't consume much RAM, queries are blazing fast but we found a problem: the queries were very hard to write, it took a long time to figure out the API, we had to go and write our own @nodejs library to make it work properly.

It lost most of its support. Since then, we migrated to Couchbase and the learning curve was steep but all worth it. Memcached indexing out of the box, full text search works great.

592k views592k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Couchbase
Couchbase
Azure Cosmos DB
Azure Cosmos DB

Developed as an alternative to traditionally inflexible SQL databases, the Couchbase NoSQL database is built on an open source foundation and architected to help developers solve real-world problems and meet high scalability demands.

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

JSON document database; N1QL (SQL-like query language); Secondary Indexing; Full-Text Indexing; Eventing/Triggers; Real-Time Analytics; Mobile Synchronization for offline support; Autonomous Operator for Kubernetes and OpenShift
Fully managed with 99.99% Availability SLA;Elastically and highly scalable (both throughput and storage);Predictable low latency: <10ms @ P99 reads and <15ms @ P99 fully-indexed writes;Globally distributed with multi-region replication;Rich SQL queries over schema-agnostic automatic indexing;JavaScript language integrated multi-record ACID transactions with snapshot isolation;Well-defined tunable consistency models: Strong, Bounded Staleness, Session, and Eventual
Statistics
Stacks
505
Stacks
594
Followers
606
Followers
1.1K
Votes
110
Votes
130
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    High performance
  • 18
    Flexible data model, easy scalability, extremely fast
  • 9
    Mobile app support
  • 7
    You can query it with Ansi-92 SQL
  • 6
    All nodes can be read/write
Cons
  • 3
    Terrible query language
Pros
  • 28
    Best-of-breed NoSQL features
  • 22
    High scalability
  • 15
    Globally distributed
  • 14
    Automatic indexing over flexible json data model
  • 10
    Tunable consistency
Cons
  • 18
    Pricing
  • 4
    Poor No SQL query support
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Kafka
Kafka
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Azure Machine Learning
Azure Machine Learning
MongoDB
MongoDB
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Azure Functions
Azure Functions
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Azure Websites
Azure Websites
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Couchbase, Azure Cosmos DB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase